Open 579: Pick Your (Chocolate) Power -- Game Over

[Romitelli]

Love the stock photo.

VOTE: Aneninen

Hey Annie.

[Romitelli]

I went for the YOLO 1 draft but my plans were foiled.

2 was a pretty popular option lol.

[Romitelli]

Not particularly, but why do you ask?

[Romitelli]

Anem suggested amy was scummy
For being concerned with which picks are bests for scum

Scum have day talk
I don't see why scum would ask the public
When they could discuss in private

Fake speculation? Adding to an ongoing discussion just to appear active?

Dammit, I searched the phrase "scum found" in his post history, lemme try that again.
Okay turns out you can't link a search. Basically I saw him saying 'scum found' and I got a flashback of the last game.

This is the "scum found" post: #569.

It was midway through day 2, his day 1 play seems different from this one.

I'll also
UNVOTE:

[Romitelli]

@Droog,

I'd like your opinion on the scenarios I proposed to you in 159.

@Amy.

I feel that this statement:

On the other hand, I don't like him dragging the theory discussion on and on, and while we did still get game-related posts from him, it seems like an easy way to beef up one's ISO and natter on about something that looks like participation.

Contradicts heavily with this previous statement:

Regarding the second point, there was hardly anything else I had to talk about. And if you can't beat them then join them. I don't want to lurk about at the start of a game.

You're saying that Mathdino is scummy for dragging out the setup spec discussion just to "beef up" his ISO, yet you previously said you had joined such discussion in the first place because there was nothing else to talk about and you didn't want to lurk.

How are these two situations any different?

[Romitelli]

Sorry for the absence. Will read the game and post later tonight.