In post 13, Heartless wrote:this time we got the PGO so i guess no one target us tonight.
why not keep quiet about it today and try to get scum to target you tonight?
y'know, turn a negative into a positive.
In post 13, Heartless wrote:this time we got the PGO so i guess no one target us tonight.
In post 83, PeregrineV wrote:Nope. Shortcutting it before it induces day1 apathy. Interact all you want, but cut out all of the "lynch Mollie!" posting. Then, tomorrow, if you want to do it, go for it.
In post 235, Jackel98 wrote:Not necessarily, but it wasn't scum, either.They random-voted mastin, like I did.Sera said nothing about not caring who is lynched until people die, I don't think.
Beats me. I'm just didn't get what you were trying saying - where you going with it - so I was slightly curious.In post 287, Jackel98 wrote:I said I voted Mastin randomly. It appears that Sera voted Mastin randomly. What else is there to say?
In post 307, BipolarChemist wrote:
I didn't really understand most any of the heartless/anti/mollie interaction. Why your vote on mollie here?
In post 149, Shaft wrote:How bout Cheet explains that before we pull out the pitchforks?
Psyche are you sure that's not some kind of courier message used to screw with you? UT loves couriers/fruit vendors/stuff like that.
In post 462, Shaft wrote:
Apparently this is the Cheet game with the life insurance bullshit? Because I saw it mentioned again but did not see an answer to it and I'm on page 13. Chucking Cheet on the scumlist for now.
In post 522, Hostile Intent wrote:All of these are dumb and/or not happening. Get real.
In post 604, Seraphim wrote: Also, what changed between 536 and his post where he actually lays down his vote?
In post 836, Marquis wrote:not only is doing that town
In post 1059, Seraphim wrote:I am the Lumpy Space Princess. I have two abilities: one is my one-shot BP. The other is a two-shot self-redirector which takes a person's ability and redirects it to me that night. I took no action last night because it was not obvious who the scum were so I did not attempt to eat the kill...also I would not have been informed (WHICH IS WHY I ASKED IN THE FIRST PLACE) if I had been shot rendered my role useless as a quasi-Watcher type.
In post 473, ika wrote:
beast - prob town, i have 2 hydra games with him where we were both town so im going from that to say hes town atm
lot's a talk going on at the tableIn post 1119, Jackel98 wrote:No one talked about my innocent of random bystander. Or about me. Or about my obvious towniness.
In post 1059, Seraphim wrote:I took no action last night because it was not obvious who the scum were so I did not attempt to eat the kill...
In post 1331, estival wrote:Why lynch a lurker? Why not request the mod to prod and then if nothing comes of it then wait for a replace? Lynching someone who could be town, in a game with possible two scum factions or who knows what else, is bad and scummy.
Why those two in particular?
In post 1462, Seraphim wrote:If I could shoot someone, I would probably shoot Honey Bee. I might also shoot Jackel but I think Honey Bee would be more likely.
Unvote
Vote: theamateur
In post 1536, mastin2 wrote:Also, justsayin', 4nxi3ty looks like scum to me.
In post 1582, estival wrote:Anxiety, hi there question asked re Shaft. Answer much?
In post 1550, estival wrote:Why did you ask me about shaft? Lack of follow through.
In post 1769, estival wrote:I was feeling this vote when 4Anxiety accidentally asked me to ISO shaft instead of the person I mentioned in my post and then tried to pretend it was planned like that:
In post 1620, 4nxi3ty wrote:tho looking back can you explain this more:"As for Shaft, it makes me suspicious of theamateur more."I'm having trouble seeing the connnection.
In post 1884, Cheetory6 wrote:Also also@4nx, can you walk me through why you feel that estival's wild theories are more likely to come from town?
In post 1881, Cheetory6 wrote:Who do you think is scum 4nx?
In post 1239, Gilgamesh King Of Heroes wrote:BROseidon, is Seraphim scum with ika, or on a separate scumteam?
In post 2112, Heartless wrote:I figured that, even though scum obviously survived the PGO shot, it didn'tnecessitateone of Seraphim or BROseiden being scum because there are so many variables at work that I couldn't even presume to know.
In post 2352, Hostile Intent wrote:I'm not an answering machine, but you're ability to be a broken record is staggeringly humorous.
Go back to "quitting" its a good look for you.
In post 2353, estival wrote:When people threaten to quit, I like to post after them with a "replace the fuck out then" post until they either do so or stop, "whiny whiny whine whine". I find it funny.
doubt they want you gone. Drama is circling around you in this game. No awareness of thread real-estate either.In post 2354, estival wrote:Since I'm Unlynchable and town I doubt scum will let me live beyond a certain point. It effs with them so I expect to die.
I think this points to sera town but I'm not super confident about it.In post 1383, Flubbernugget wrote:I don't remember Seraph's D1 play and good luck getting me to re-read.
Seraph has obvious scumpoints for his case on Heartless, but his revision of it seems to come from a town mindset. It's a reevaluation that doesn't continue to make a case on Heartless, something I think scum would have difficulty doing.
In post 2700, Bookitty wrote:What is your read on VonFlare, please?
In post 2681, Gilgamesh King Of Heroes wrote:Eventually, Heartless' neg-utility can bite us in the ass, so he needs to die in a few days. Preferably with an extra day to revisit Seraphim if necessary.
In post 2953, Gilgamesh King Of Heroes wrote:Anxiety, what do you mean by 'absolute bulletproof'?
In post 2884, The Critic wrote:
In post 2961, BROseidon wrote:The thing with p5 is that I think he's scum, but the reasons I think he's scum are all things he did in Capcom crossover when he was town, so I'm not sure if that game was an anomaly and I'm right here or if my model is just broken for him
In post 2983, Bookitty wrote:But either we're going to lynch 4nxi3ty and have a guaranteed not-town lynch
In post 2041, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 2038, Cheetory6 wrote:Do you think estival lynch is going to happen with the support it has right now? People are stuck on Shaft, so he should fucking get in here and do literally anything so the game can move forward. I have no qualms with lynching someone linked to a scumflip who's holding the game's momentum hostage.
I think wagoning a less active player is going to stall harder than wagoning estival
In post 3049, mastin2 wrote:-I have a set expiration date. (People seem to have forgotten this fact, but it's true.)