Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

pieguyn · Post Post #1500 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:34 am

votecount 2.9

Shadowcat (1) - White Narcissus
Skold (1) - Thor and Loki

Not voting (10) - Ankamius, notscience, Zymf, Skold, ZZZX, SXTLHGaiden, Mikazuki, Shadowcat, Witness Protection, ZeL1nK2

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is April 14, 00:30 GMT-7 or in (expired on 2015-04-14 00:00:30).

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1501 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:35 am

I can't say "votecount, please" because people are actually voting now and it won't be as funny. (It was funny before, though. I don't care what anyone thinks.)

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1502 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:42 am

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum: Skold

Just so it's clear where my current thoughts on the lynch are.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1503 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:48 am

Idk, it seems unlikely for pie to have given scum a VT fake claim, and his frustration and anger reads genuine to me, I don't like how he decided to stop what he was doing because of the anger tho, but i've felt like that before, just that in my case i usually end up with a self-vote or a replace out, if your meta assesment of him is true about him self-hammering then i could see him reacting like this as town.
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1504 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:49 am

The fact that Nacho doesn't see this is bothering me a hell lot tho
~Sakura

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1505 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:51 am

It's not the reactions that bother me, it's the content he's producing.

(Also I imagine if there's anything close to a goon in this game, they have a VT fake-claim. At the very least, scum have the option of claiming VT if they so choose.)

Mikazuki · Post Post #1506 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:53 am

In post 1503, White Narcissus wrote:Idk, it seems unlikely for pie to have given scum a VT fake claim, and his frustration and anger reads genuine to me, I don't like how he decided to stop what he was doing because of the anger tho, but i've felt like that before, just that in my case i usually end up with a self-vote or a replace out, if your meta assesment of him is true about him self-hammering then i could see him reacting like this as town.
~Sakura

In the other game modded by Pieguyn there was one VT fakeclaim out of the three scum, so I wouldn't rule out that possibility completely.

I'm not completely sold on Skold scum and I'd really like to see the rest of his analysis ASAP, but we do really need a lynch within like the next 18 hours.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1507 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:57 am

I was scumreading Skold last night because he was doing nothing and lufan put him as town while scumreading ZZZX, but this frustration seems a lot like how i get when people misread me, Nacho should know better than me how an angry/frustrated townie looks since he's played a ton of games with me, which is why it's bothering me that he's not seeing this at the very least.
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1508 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:58 am

On the other hand i think if Zymf gets replaced we could get a deadline extension, maybe? @_@
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1509 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:02 am

On another note Shadowcat also promised content and never delivered even after i told them to produce some within 24 hours (which is plenty of time), Skold at least tried to give his thoughts as he went on with his catch up, why are you guys not seeing this.
~Sakura

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1510 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:05 am

I see it.

I don't like Shadowcat for not providing content.

But I also don't like Skold for the content he's provided.

Skold · Post Post #1511 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:13 am

In post 1506, Mikazuki wrote:I'm not completely sold on Skold scum and I'd really like to see the rest of his analysis ASAP, but we do really need a lynch within like the next 18 hours.

Think I've said it before but I'm not doing it. I'll do some ISOs but not much else. I've read all of D1 and 2 and don't see much purpose listing things you've already read before. That and I honestly can't be arsed. I'll state this again as my current list of reads:
Town: Mika, Wis, Ze
Null: Anyone not mentioned
Scum: Working on it. Maybe Gaiden, maybe ZZZX. Pending ISOs.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1512 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:15 am

ZZZX can we get a flavour claim please?

pieguyn · Post Post #1513 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:18 am

4nxi3ty replaces Zymf!

EDIT: Deadline extended by 24 hours.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1514 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:22 am

So I guess 1d15hours until the next tick.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1515 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:25 am

In post 1393, pieguyn wrote:
In post 1314, ZeL1nK2 wrote:
@pieguy

Could you please clarify whether the 24-hour extension affected the 48-hour ticks?

The extra 24 hours did not count; if I need to extend the deadline, the darkness timer is paused until the "extra" time runs out.

Maybe my English is just that bad, I took this to mean that it's still darkness increasing every 48 hours regardless of extensions, until we pass the original 10 day deadline, and then the darkness is delayed.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #1516 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:27 am

eyo

so from what I've skimmed so far there should be no dilly-dallying during the day cause of darkness increase, so why did this day make it so close to deadline?
(also I love that my vote has the added weight of "I'll increase your darkness by 1%")

Can someone pwetty plz give quick summary of what's going on so don't have to devote too much time to reading?

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1517 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:31 am

I think this is an accurate representation of the current pseudo-votes.

Mikazuki hasn't officially unvoted (that I remember seeing) but has indicated she is unwilling to lynch Shadowcat so I removed her vote from the Shadowcat wagon.

I see ghosts so mean, red corpses too, nothing but gloom, for me and you, and I think to myself... What a terrible school.

Pseudo-Votecount 2.7

Shadowcat (5)

: White Narcissus, SXTLHGaiden, Zymf, Ankamius, Witness Protection

Skold (3)

: Thor and Loki, notscience, ZeL1nK2

ZeL1nK2 (1)

: Shadowcat

Not Pseudo-Voting (3)

: Mikazuki, Skold, ZZZX

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Pseudo-lynch. We're aiming for a lynch within (expired on 2015-04-11 00:00:30).

Spoiler: DAY ONE PSEUDO-VOTECOUNTS

Spoiler: DAY TWO PSEUDO-VOTECOUNTS

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1518 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:33 am

In post 1516, 4nxi3ty wrote:so from what I've skimmed so far there should be no dilly-dallying during the day cause of darkness increase, so why did this day make it so close to deadline?

Easter, lurking, active-lurking, take your pick.

As for a summary... Stuff happened. Scum flip D1. People lurking today. The end.

Skold · Post Post #1519 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:35 am

Zelink can you explain psuedo votes to our newcomer? I'm lazy.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1520 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:37 am

It seems fairly obvious, though.

Pseudo-voting until a pseudo-lynch is achieved. Then actually vote said player. Avoid unnecessary darkness increase on other players.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1521 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:39 am

Pvote: ZZZX

I keep going into WIFOM over his interaction with lufan so I decided to just disregard it.

Other than questioning me and then attacking Skold for no reason, he's done very little despite saying that he'll contribute using discussions. Also I thought his line of questioning on me was seemed like bad reaching but that could just be bias speaking. Basically, to me, it looks a little like he's trying to look like he's doing something while contributing nothing, and I don't like that at all.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1522 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:45 am

In post 1515, Mikazuki wrote:
In post 1393, pieguyn wrote:
if I need to extend the deadline, the darkness timer is paused until the "extra" time runs out.

Maybe my English is just that bad, I took this to mean that it's still darkness increasing every 48 hours regardless of extensions, until we pass the original 10 day deadline, and then the darkness is delayed.

I cut out the unnecessary stuff. It says when a deadline extension happens, the darkness timer is paused until the extended time is run through.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1523 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:45 am

I thought that meant the extra time at the end of the day, oops.

pieguyn · Post Post #1524 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:49 am