In post 34, Magua wrote:I wouldn't put this rule into my ruleset, and I really enjoy having long and detailed rulesets, because it's just so cornercase as to not be worth it.
If it came down to half of the players voting no lynch and the other half voting someone, I see no reason not to give both sides a chance to try to persuade the other side of their case.
Yup, this is me. I understand that strictly speaking it's a degenerate case. In practice, the fact that no lynch people win a tied deadlock of no lynch vs lynch foo on evens is a rare enough impact that whatever. If you don't have compulsory kills, how often are people even no lynching anyway? I don't think it's worth the overhead of having another rule, I guess.