In post 695, Persivul wrote:
It sows confusion instead of cohesion in the collective scum hunt.
No, it doesn't. It's only our vote. Unless your implying that, for some reason, our vote effects the overall game-state more than anybody elses vote what you're saying it flat out false.
No, it doesn't. It allows us to work out the alignment of the person attacking us. Again, you seem to be insistent that our actions effect the game-state as a whole more than anybody elses. Just because we're defensive, that doesn't stop other people from scum hunting.
You also didn't answer the question of why we wouldn't want to survive as town.
In post 695, Persivul wrote:A townie who doesn't feel an imminent threat doesn't worry about a few pokes at them. They figure that if they keep scum hunting people will see it and the pokes will pass.
Again, you didn't answer the question. Why is it scummy to try and understand the motivation and the alignment behind the person attacking you?
I would argue that completely side-stepping an issue to look like you're scum hunting is scummier than addressing the issue itself.
696 - I was scum in WF. I tunneled on ika all game trying to convince Anti he was scum (they were both town); Anti didn't buy it and stayed firm with his read all game. Ika feels like scum to me in this game (I'm not great at reading ika though) but Anti seems insistent he is town. I don't see Anti being wrong on ika unless they're both scum (and I'm pretty sure Anti isn't scum) so I'm inclined to trust his read on ika more than my own. Having said that, I still think ika is scum, this is nothing like his WF play and I'm interested to see why Anti thinks it is.
699 - This is bad though. Why is it between Persivul and us?
701 - Pre-flip associatives are bad and you should feel bad for mentioning it.
This is a convenient position for you to take up Sthar. Explain your scum read on us?
