Mini 1684: Shucking Bullfit Mafia - Game Called
-
-
Hyperion
-
-
Hyperion Goon
-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 34, Dinare wrote:In post 31, Marquis wrote:
also my role necessitates we massclaim asap day 1
tammy starts (no need to waste words protesting!)
Why do we need to massclaim, and why does tammy start?
Are these questions even really necessary?-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 32, Tammy wrote: I won't answer anymore than I have and this will get you nowhere but irritate me, so move on.
BUT THATS MY FAVORITE THING TO DO!
Spoiler:-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
-
-
Hyperion
-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 45, Cephrir wrote:In post 41, Pegasus30 wrote:This game is setup as 9-3-1 so right off the bat, we have more scum than normal. Assuming one townie can't vote (that's what treestump means, right?), the game can end even faster. Hypothetical: Let's say that third party has a kill and we mislynch on day 1. The third party and mafia kill a townie each. We'll be left with 10 players among which scum control four votes, town control five and one is a treestump. Even if we lynch mafia, we could end up with 7 players the next day 2 of which are mafia, 1 third party, and 3 townie votes. That's not enough to have a town-controlled lynch because we need 4 to lynch. Bottomline - the game may be unwinnable after a single mislynch which is bad game design.
If there is a treestump, it is mathematically more likely to be scum of some sort or have additional powers which activate later on in the game.
Tammy, vote someone please. If you are a tree-stump, then your vote shouldn't count.
What was the point of this post?
VOTE: Pegasus30
Its CLEARLY a chance to look busy by doing setup speculation while simultaneously throwing fake shade at Tammy based on her role and not her actual content.
GOSH CEPHRIR LET THE MAN DO HIS THING.-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 50, Cephrir wrote:I'm sorry, Hyperion, you're right. That was so rude of me.
Well as long as you apologize. And remember you have to MEAN it.
In post 51, A Muffin wrote:We gotta also remember that the roles in this game were created without any balance in mind, so there could be some meta thing that fucks us all over D2 lmao
Setup speculation still is useless, do you have anyhting to say about the current content being posted?
Layla, don't you try and piggyback off my line of questioning (grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr )-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
-
-
Hyperion
-
-
Hyperion Goon
-
-
Hyperion
-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 66, Dinare wrote:In post 38, Hyperion wrote:In post 34, Dinare wrote:In post 31, Marquis wrote:
also my role necessitates we massclaim asap day 1
tammy starts (no need to waste words protesting!)
Why do we need to massclaim, and why does tammy start?
Are these questions even really necessary?
In post 53, Layla wrote:I've decided where to vote!
I'm gonna vote Dinare because his post 34 sounds like throwing a random question to look like town doing something productive when it's not. What he asked would've been easy to figure out with a simple bit of reading.
VOTE: Dinare
So, you guys are content with the possibility of massclaim for no other reason than "my role necessitates." I don't know about you, but I'm going to need more reason than that before I accept anyone claiming anything.
If he didn't give what you consider a definitive reason the first time, do you really think he would have given a more solid one because you asked?-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 110, A Muffin wrote:In post 104, Marquis wrote:hi assmuffin how do you feel about policy lynches how do you feel about starting the massclaim and getting tammy's balls rolling
still dont understand why you need a massclaim so no
policy lynches have their uses but not really on D1 when we can get someone actually scummy
In post 105, Tammy wrote:Muffin - Why does it seem scummy that I'm not sharing the details of my pr?
i just sort of fail to see why you wouldn't share them
Muffin- Why are you make a point against claiming in the same post that you pressure Tammy to claim?
And just for the irony (or something like that, I'm terrible at irony):
In post 113, A Muffin wrote:In post 112, Marquis wrote:oh but that would require that i also participate in the massclaim!
of course, you cant be expected to be held to the same standard as you hold everyone else can you-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 218, Soul2277 wrote:I'd like everyone to claim what mod their role came from. I'll explain the reasoning later (as in immediately after the mass mod role claiming is done), but for now I'd rather not elaborate. Oversoul already said our role is from AP. Cephir said his role is from BBMolla. Marquis can you confirm if your role is actually drag queen in which case that'd be Bro.
Soul2277: AP
Cephir: BBMolla
Marquis: Bro(?)
~Mehdi
Before I finish my reread, I will say I don't know which mod made my role, but they are into anime I think.-
-
Hyperion
-
-
Hyperion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 887
- Joined: May 31, 2012
In post 605, BROseidon wrote:Fate was me. I'd like to apologize to the scum team for the role - I wanted to test something with how to make survivor less terrible, and the role ended up being really dumb. I should have taken a more conservative approach to the role.
Actually, all of the really dumb/broken roles were me.
I actually really like the Scarlet Witch and Shaka Zulu roles though
I actually had a ton of fun, so I hope you guys do something like this again!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-
-
-
-