[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6937840 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open Game Queue (Old) - Mafiascum.net
For archiving signup threads after their corresponding games are complete.
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Post
Post #6 (isolation #0) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:07 am
Postby Green Crayons »
/in 602
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #11 (isolation #1) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:15 am
Postby Green Crayons »
In post 8, vettrock wrote:Question: The setup list has 2 mason, but the Roles then lists a recruited Mason. Is the second mason recruited? What is the recruiting mechanism? Its not clear in the wiki.
Two masons to begin with.
They get a chance to recruit a third.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #2351 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:11 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
/in 681
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #2515 (isolation #3) » Wed Apr 05, 2017 4:16 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
/in 684
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #2524 (isolation #4) » Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:03 am
Postby Green Crayons »
/out 684
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #3809 (isolation #5) » Wed May 16, 2018 5:25 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
In 727.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).