[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6814307 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null It's the Team Mafia Tea Party (Dead Thread) - Mafiascum.net
yeah. i was telling ank all the time bbt was scum, as well that it was best to lynch reg, but he lynched ces for whatever reason. too bad, we would have 3 wins :/
In post 244, Metal Sonic wrote:You had the scum fucking up their fake claims to work with.
This. The game was only won because scum fucked up their claims: Tier claimed a thought process to go with his role that was just not possible, and shos fucked up completely and doomed both grey and himself.
Without those fuck-ups I don't know if we would have won.
I know, which is why I kept telling him to replace out as well as being against his lynch when it happened. But I don't hold it against the town because it's understandable that you can't keep such slots alive in the game.
Also I really appreciate the input mastin brought to my game via ns. She was accurate on both grey and Tier, and if it weren't for that push on Tier I am not sure if I would have ultimately agreed with the wagon on him that resulted in his crappy fakeclaim.
That would force teams to potentially recruit people who they don't like/don't work well with. I much prefer it the way it was - "we need a replacement for x game, who do we know that could handle this? Let's ask him."
In post 328, Metal Sonic wrote:1) current replacement system is skewed greatly towards townsided, because town will benefit more for choosing an appropriate replacement while scum usually don't because "too unethical" or "lurking is a scum tactic" or whatever reason
I think scum could just as easily use that to their benefit to recruit strong scum players or do appropriate WIFOM switches. The fact it didn't happen enough doesn't make the system bad.
2) Reck mentioned how players with conflicts were able to hop into a game while others lacked the privilege, effectively trapping the other into a simply toxic game state (do I have your plea correct?)
What would be different in your proposed system? Say Grey was first in a replacement list and a team in Reck's game needed a replacement. Wouldn't that force Grey and Reck in the same game? Even worse, say Reck's team needed a replacement - your system would force them in the same team!
In post 235, Wisdom wrote:i personally blame ank because he didnt listen to me, not ika, but it doesnt change the fact that ika quickhammered without much thinking.
You're really fucking unbelievable, you know that?
Sorry, that came out harsher than I intended. I understand the lylo pressure and CES was pretty scummy, so I don't think that you played bad or anything, you went for a lynch of a player that was very likely scum. It's just that a little more thinking on both your part and ika's would make you realize that Reg was a better lynch than CES no matter what. I think you said it yourself that CES-BBT was impossible; that made a regfan lynch a nobrainer.
I feel bitter about it because I was accurate on both BBT and Regfan and I really wanted us to go 4-0, so seeing you making the suboptimal choice and that costing us the fourth win leaves me sad. Obviously it is just a game and I won't hold it against you; this was just this bitterness of me showing in that post.
In post 427, Kagami wrote:4. Point system determines victor. +10 points for winning a game, -3 points for swapping teammates between games, -2 points for replacing a teammate. Special penalties for things like the nacho slip (-5 points or w/e). Any tiebreaking system we apply here if town wins the normal is going to be flawed; I wouldn't mind seeing the cockettes win purely for being a solid team that didn't need replacements.
Like, based on her system both teams would have 40 points after a townwin in the normal so it would still need a tiebreaker
I don't think either of the other two teams were better than you but that's not the point here. Kagami was suggesting that her system counters the need for a tiebreaker when it doesn't is the point
yeah delta's dead, it's 3p lylo and egg/sthar are crossvoting. Trojan posted and didn't hammer. I don't really think the last game of team mafia is the place to troll?
its more like I wish you had lynched one of them like I told you to rather than i blame you for it, it's just we were having a blame discussion so it came out like that
it was your game, it's not like i can fault you for doing your thing
In post 11, Llamarble wrote:13P mini could have gone so much better for scum... Egg did not want to vote for Thor but scum forced him to by making the alternative a no-lynch. If Thor had been around / voted TH, or if Sthar had switched, they could've lynched town, killed pieguy, and been ahead.
Blue, Meth, Blade and Associates: 3-1
Confectionery Animals: 3-1
Gestalt: 3-1
Indecisive: 3-1
The Cockettes: 3-1
The Leftovers: 3-1
The Unviggable Vegetables: 3-1
The Westeros Circlejerk: 3-1
God Save the Black Goo: 2-2
Marshmallow: 2-2
Sickeningly Sweet: 2-2
TBD: 2-2
team nocaps: 2-2
TEAM WITH NO NAME: 2-2
The Athenians: 2-2
The Captains: 2-2
The Hitmen: 2-2
Blue, Meth, Blade and Associates - 2 scum
The Westeros Circlejerk - 2 scum
The Unviggable Vegetables - 2 scum
Gestalt - 1 scum
Confectionary Animals - all town
The Leftovers - all town
Indecisive - all town
The Cockettes - all town
