[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6900548 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 483: The Phantom Menace ABANDONED - Mafiascum.net
Btw, I didn't vote for myself, because I don't think I will make a good VC (or SC). So I decided to vote for someone else, wihtout any specific reason.
In post 46, Axxle wrote:TTH, at this point (early as it is), who would you vote as VC if it couldn't be yourself and why?
No one, I'd let the clock run out and the RNG pick.
I don't understand you.
Since everyone is "equally bad" according to you (because a randomized pick is either worse than a normal pick, when you choose someone, or the same, when every possibility is equally bad (or good)), why don't you roll a dice for example? What's the point of not voting?
There's only one benefit: people won't "accuse" you for voting for a player. You don't have to take "responsibility" for your vote...
It probably won't make much sense to anyone else but here:
In post 13, The Bulge wrote:Trying to wrap my head around the mechanics. This should be interesting.
I'm half-expecting the elections to look like that scene in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie.
Vice Chancellor votes probably aren't too important for analysis but once we get into Supreme Chancellor that will be interesting.
Vice Chancellor: The Bulge
This mostly trips my gut instincts about people who talk about how "interesting" something will be. The lack of a follow through when the voting was actually going on makes me think he was just saying this stuff as filler.
I move to close debate and to bring a motion to the floor.
Let's terminate vett's position and see what happens.
Let's not. And if you do, remember what I said about the SC and VC positions.
Self voting is a town thing to do as you are the only confirmed town. Scum knows who their partners are.
It probably won't make much sense to anyone else but here:
In post 13, The Bulge wrote:Trying to wrap my head around the mechanics. This should be interesting.
I'm half-expecting the elections to look like that scene in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie.
Vice Chancellor votes probably aren't too important for analysis but once we get into Supreme Chancellor that will be interesting.
Vice Chancellor: The Bulge
This mostly trips my gut instincts about people who talk about how "interesting" something will be. The lack of a follow through when the voting was actually going on makes me think he was just saying this stuff as filler.
It probably won't make much sense to anyone else but here:
In post 13, The Bulge wrote:Trying to wrap my head around the mechanics. This should be interesting.
I'm half-expecting the elections to look like that scene in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie.
Vice Chancellor votes probably aren't too important for analysis but once we get into Supreme Chancellor that will be interesting.
Vice Chancellor: The Bulge
This mostly trips my gut instincts about people who talk about how "interesting" something will be. The lack of a follow through when the voting was actually going on makes me think he was just saying this stuff as filler.
In post 162, The Bulge wrote:I don't get why I'm getting shit for this when Flames has just as many posts as I do but with even less content. Just saying.
That won't help you...
In post 163, The Bulge wrote:I don't like this. He went straight from "that was obviously an RVS vote" to being all defensive about it.
Nope. In 38 I state that my vote was random. In 39 I tell you why I voted randomly instead of voting for myself. I cannot see the "being all defensive about it" part.
In post 163, The Bulge wrote:40 and 42 is a stupid pointless line of questioning.
Lol. Could you tell me why were those questions pointless? Vettrock was scummy, even he admitted that he wanted to be safe and then he contradicted himself.
In post 163, The Bulge wrote:134 riding on TTH's question to look useful. Like idek? What was the point of re-quoting it? It's like you wanted it to be your question.
I was curious. I wanted to hear a response from you before I propose your removal.
In post 212, Count Dooku wrote:@Mainez
Did you actually vote "nope" or you just forgot about it so you didn't vote.
yes i did vote 'nay'. why do you ask this?
Because I don't understand why you voted "no". But, since you were not very active D1, as somene else pointed it out in Oman's chamber (I don't remember who), I thought maybe you didn't vote at all.
But now I know that you voted no on purpose... So why?
In post 223, Axxle wrote:@Bulge, Mainez, Dooku: Who did you visit and why?
@Bulge, Dooku: was it productive?
I visited Oman because I thought that the point of it is that we can talk during the recess phase, too. Oman was the VC, so I knew that there is a good chance that others would visit him, too. The other optioms were you and TTH (imo), but I had a stronger townread on Oman than I had on you two.
I don't think it was that productive.
In post 235, Mainez wrote:actually post 1 says "If you have to PM a choice to the mod (i.e. the name of someone you want to kill/protect/investigate)..."
so there are kills? does that mean something happened last night that stopped the kill?
lol this game is so confusing
If there are night kills indeed and if you had known it, would you have voted "yes"?
