In post 3474, Titus wrote:@Pere, Are you claiming you targeted me every single night? or that you were inactive?
I didn't say any of this.
Read 3469.
In post 3474, Titus wrote:@Pere, Are you claiming you targeted me every single night? or that you were inactive?
In post 3476, Titus wrote:I'm telling you that isn't clear.
By saying you targeted no one else. That could mean you a) targeted me every night and failed or b) never targeted at all. I want that cleared up.
In post 3461, PeregrineV wrote:No, I took a shot in the dark day1, figuring it would help me either get a scumread on you, or we could scumhunt hard in the neighborhood together if I thought you were town.
Pretty clear.
When it didn't happen, I figured you would be "unavailable" on future nights.
If I figured that, why would I keep trying to target you?
Other players I thought might be worthwhile town targets I did not feel would live long, so I didn't bother.
Pretty clear that I did no other neighboring attempts.
In post 3477, davesaz wrote:Looks like major league role fishing to me.
Shall we lynch it?
VOTE: PeregrineV
In post 3478, PeregrineV wrote:In post 3476, Titus wrote:I'm telling you that isn't clear.
By saying you targeted no one else. That could mean you a) targeted me every night and failed or b) never targeted at all. I want that cleared up.
In post 3461, PeregrineV wrote:No, I took a shot in the dark day1, figuring it would help me either get a scumread on you, or we could scumhunt hard in the neighborhood together if I thought you were town.
Pretty clear.
When it didn't happen, I figured you would be "unavailable" on future nights.
If I figured that, why would I keep trying to target you?
Other players I thought might be worthwhile town targets I did not feel would live long, so I didn't bother.
Pretty clear that I did no other neighboring attempts.
In post 3479, PeregrineV wrote:In post 3477, davesaz wrote:Looks like major league role fishing to me.
Shall we lynch it?
VOTE: PeregrineV
Peregrine: I think we should massclaim.
Dave: Looks like major role fishing to me.
Using your analogy, I want to grenade the whole lake.
Are you for or against massclaim?
In post 3482, davesaz wrote:In post 3479, PeregrineV wrote:In post 3477, davesaz wrote:Looks like major league role fishing to me.
Shall we lynch it?
VOTE: PeregrineV
Peregrine: I think we should massclaim.
Dave: Looks like major role fishing to me.
Using your analogy, I want to grenade the whole lake.
Are you for or against massclaim?
You claimed a mostly useless role, and on top of that claimed to have no results from it N1 and to have not used it since.
In claiming the no result, you assigned Titus a speculative role to see how she would react to it.
The mass claim suggestion has no bearing on this read. FWIW, I'm not sure it is time yet. By having made your (questionable) claim already, you place others in a bind -- do they go along since so many roles are already out there, or hold back? Either way scum find out who the PRs are, right? Plus they gain the chance to hide among the PRs, which town are notoriously unwilling to lynch in closed setups.
I'm leaning toward massclaim hurts town, but remain open minded about it.
In post 3472, Thor665 wrote:I don't even like the Titus slot, but the Pere slot is worse.
In post 3485, Thor665 wrote:My attitude towards massclaim is, as it generally always is; 'sometimes it's great, sometimes it's not - and you never know till after the massclaim'. If we massclaim, fine. If we don't, that is also fine. I will work with the gamestate at that point. You can call me a 'Yes' if it makes you happy.
I do know one thing - the way to make it happen is not the way you're going about it.
Why have you not been addressing my issue with your slot? We had like one back and forth and then I felt like you tucked tail and ran - why was that?
In post 3486, PeregrineV wrote:The gamestate is such that I feel a massclaim will help us win the game in the shortest amount of time.
In post 3486, PeregrineV wrote:I was uncertain enough if you were town, so I wanted to keep pressure on you. If you were town, then scum would leave me alone since I was wrong, hoping to manipulate me in the future.
If you were scum, maybe you'd slip up.
(Slim hope, but you're tough to read.)
Not sure of your issues with my slot, since I'm the only one in it the whole game. I don't need a back and forth to know your town at this point.
Trying to scumhunt me will be a waste of time because I should pretty much be the NK tonight.
Because of that, I want all of the "confirmed town" to focus on the last 4 scum.
In post 3486, PeregrineV wrote:If you were town, then scum would leave me alone since I was wrong, hoping to manipulate me in the future.
In post 3488, Titus wrote:PV, I have a huge problem with your four "confirmed town" theory and your wanting a massclaim. If you have four confirmed town and four scum in a pool, town should be at or near autowin, thus mass claim is not necessary. Yet, you're pushing mass claim hard.
In post 3489, Thor665 wrote:In post 3486, PeregrineV wrote:If you were town, then scum would leave me alone since I was wrong, hoping to manipulate me in the future.
Why didn't this idea crop up with CDB?
In post 3492, Thor665 wrote:Yes, and scum Left you alone" right?
So - why didn't that twig him to town for you?
In post 3490, PeregrineV wrote:In post 3488, Titus wrote:PV, I have a huge problem with your four "confirmed town" theory and your wanting a massclaim. If you have four confirmed town and four scum in a pool, town should be at or near autowin, thus mass claim is not necessary. Yet, you're pushing mass claim hard.
I'd like to see your math how 8 town and 4 scum is a "near autowin".
We need 4 days of straight scumlynches. One slipup extends the game that much longer, 2 and we lose?
In post 3459, Titus wrote:I like LG's frustration on feeling ignored. Is it possible that Barn checked Riabli?
In post 3496, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:My gut tells me Titus is more likely to be scum than Peregrine. He needs to stop jumping to the conclusion that certain players are confirmed town though.