In post 1302, All Alone wrote:In post 1283, Netherspite wrote:He says that his wagon looks scum driven and thus it's on town.
He's trying to turn it upside down in that passage because initially he said that it was 3 wagons on townies (him included) that me andAlchemist21joined. Now he's attempting to cover his scumslip by saying the reverse: that the wagons were scum-driven and that's whydavesazis town.
We have a classic A=>B=>A logical fallacy here: "the God exists because that's what Bible says, and the Bible says the truth because it's the word of God".
Where is the A=>B=>A? Ankamius said "The wagons look like scum, therefore they're town. Not the other way around like you're trying to spin it." in that post, and I see nothing in his ISO that contradicts that.
Gosh, why is it so hard for people to see the obvious?
He is accusing us with Alchemist for participating in wagons that are scum-driven because they're on town.
Now he's trying to put it like he's considering these guys town because wagons are scum-driven.
You can't claim both things, because it becomes A => B => A.