Sorry mod.
Busy day...might be able to get some content posted tonight.
And more gob votes please.
In post 549, Wanderer-nl wrote:I don't really care about your hubby babbling about his trunk. I care about your reads and opinions of this game.
What changed your read on Vijay?
In post 535, gob wrote:woah okay guess a wagon is on me now
salamence wrote:So you think I'm distancing from someone who was voting my slot for most of this Day?
yes.
---
Really funny how this game is going, all i see is Fitz targeting me with no reason over and over again, yet nobody gets on him.
In post 545, stoz wrote:The Salamanca vs Vijay 1v1 is amusing.
Salamence, could you point out some important things from Vijay's ISO like you did with Gob? At least part of what you said about Vijay was that he was distancing from Accountant, which doesn't make any sense now.
I think there had to be 1 scum, possibly 2, in the people 7 people that lynched accountant. Removing myself and HC from that list leaves 5.
I would not want to lynch Hopkirk today. Seems reasonably town and is at least doing some ISOs and other things to try to move the game along.
That leaves Wanderer-nl, Salamence20, gob, havingfitz
Not really sure about havingfitz, has the least amount of posts of anyone still in the game. For now though I'm going to say someone going for the lurking scum would probably be off the wagon rather than on, so I'm taking him off the list for now.
That leaves Wanderer-nl, Salamence20, gob
At this stage the best I've got is that one of Wanderer / Salamanca is scum pushing an agenda (so whichever one of you is town should take a long look at the other).
Gob is just all kinds of unknown.
Sorry I don't have more, Fridays during the school terms are not good for me at all (only 1 week left in the term though).
In post 559, Hopkirk wrote:I find the dismissal of gobs as "Gob is just all kinds of unknown." confusing. Have you looked at how he got on the accountant wagon? He made a really sudden u-turn from good townread to sure she's scum with no reasoning other than (salamance i think) saying vijay and accountant could be scum together... despite gob not even believing that. The context of gob's vote was terrible.
In post 483, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 444, gob wrote:VOTE: Accountant
So i quickly skimmed some posts from both Vidjay and Accountant, i do not think there is a strong bond between them, compared to something like VeeGee and Accountant, which to me, looks like late-day distancing.
There is a connection between them, dont get me wrong.
So you think I'm distancing from someone who was voting my slot for most of this Day?
In post 535, gob wrote:woah okay guess a wagon is on me now
salamence wrote:So you think I'm distancing from someone who was voting my slot for most of this Day?
yes.
---
Really funny how this game is going, all i see is Fitz targeting me with no reason over and over again, yet nobody gets on him.
In post 235, Klingoncelt wrote:@havingfitz - See posts 84 and 94, Hopkirk notices an odd interaction between VeeGee and Vijay, and Gob's lame readlist.
UNVOTE:
I'm not looking at Vijay as Scum now.
Still scumreading VeeJay and Gob.
In post 100, Klingoncelt wrote:*cut*
And as Hopkirk pointed out, the exchange between VeeGee and Vijay looks like 2 Scums with no Daychat.
In post 565, Dessew wrote:
I got prodded (for shame.)
Anyway, I haven't read (for shame, again), but when first skimming through posts at that time, the part above caught my eyes. Acc's point was that there wasn't an actual wagon on me at the time, but the Hopkirk's other scumread did have one (this had been raised by KC before, too.) Hopkirk tried to sell it as a contradiction. I'll take another look to see wether his shifting to the Acc wagon looked constructed as a whole, too, but for now
VOTE: Hopkirk
In post 228, Hopkirk wrote:I really should have previewed that one. Some of my comments are in the big quote box.
@Hasschel, can you now explain the reasoning you wanted to keep secret from earlier?
@Klingon: We had 10 (now 9) days left in the day. I don't see any problem with putting pressure on other potential scum. Also applies to accountant saying about why split the vote. IF we're wrong D1 we have leads d2, if we're right d1, we have ideas for associations d2.
In post 203, Accountant wrote:Right now my strongest scumreads are on VeeGee and Dessew. I'm not sure what gob's doing, he started off fine with clear reads and then went on into a ramble about newbie games and how his reads are always correct. If I had to guess he's VI/scum.
My vote on VeeGee stands. I'm not particularly impressed with Hopkirk's vote splitting, especially as VG hasn't given a very sound defense and has (even more suspiciously IMO) not answered Haschel's question.
Biggest town reads are Haschel, Tex, hop.
In post 563, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 235, Klingoncelt wrote:@havingfitz - See posts 84 and 94, Hopkirk notices an odd interaction between VeeGee and Vijay, and Gob's lame readlist.
UNVOTE:
I'm not looking at Vijay as Scum now.
Still scumreading VeeJay and Gob.
Hopkirk seems to be noticing coaching between Vijay and Veegee and I don't understand how that leads to a townread on Vijay. Do you remember how you were reading Hopkirk at the time?
I checked back in your iso to see if I could find a read of Hopkirk from you, instead I found [post]100post] in which you wrote
In post 100, Klingoncelt wrote:*cut*
And as Hopkirk pointed out, the exchange between VeeGee and Vijay looks like 2 Scums with no Daychat.
You point back to this in your 235 so your townread on Vijay seems really odd to me. What did you think of gob's read on Vijay? You didn't really explain that.
In post 568, Klingoncelt wrote:*cut*
But Vijay doesn't matter now, I just read the Queue forum, he's being replaced. Back to Square One with that slot.