[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7250832 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 533: Restricted Great Idea Mafia (Game over) - Mafiascum.net
In post 150, SilverWolf wrote:BTW folks-grayfoxxxx has refused to answer questions for days and has promised content here today. He is posting elsewhere while ignoring this game. He hard townread and buddied Kop and refused to explain why.
This is a wagon that needs to happen.
Refused? I also never promised anything. I'm more than willing to give reads. But don't put words in my mouth.
Hard townread, and buddying on kop.... I think you need to recheck my iso.
In post 76, GuiltyLion wrote:Oh, maybe I misinterpreted the setup. I read the requirement that "there is at least one scum faction with 2 or more members" and thought that a setup with a scum faction of 2 and a scum faction of 1 is allowable.
But I realize now that if both have to have at least two members then it's very unlikely in terms of probability.
@mod - do any and all scum factions have to have at least 2 members?
Sorry if this is a newbie question
There's nothing to stop scum teams only 1 apart from general standard setups. I agree with whoever it was. There won't be multi in a 9 man setup.
Are you even reading the game and the setup information?
In post 79, SilverWolf wrote:VOTE: Soren
Only one of her 4 posts says anything and it isn't really showing me much.
This is too UTR, safe type of play.
What's UTR? And no, I'm not playing it safe.
What made you pick me as oppose to not mafia and gray? Each of which hasn't really shown anyone much of what they think about the game.
And given that you've fallen onto voting for someone who hasn't posted much, are most of your reads on the others town/null or in other words, no scum reads?
UTR=under the radar and when you add in that your play is safe, that's the basis for a scumread. It's D1 without a lot to go on but that's where I'm at right now. I don't vote for completely null people as a rule unless I think that pressure will bring them into the game.
@Soren-why is it that you didn't like GL's read on me because you thought my questions were easy but were so willing to accept his read on ASP who has only posted 2 posts and is basically reading him as town for doing meta research. Why is meta research more townie to you than asking questions?
More effort is put into it which is town motivated.
In post 81, Kop wrote:So that basically says there could be a
possibility
of being multi ball, but to be honest, I'd rather not speculate on that right this minute, we can leave that for day two once we have actions in, night kills to prove that theory before we can start speculating on that.
Talking about it now, doesn't offer anything and we may end up implicating people for the sake of guess work on setup.
I question that though. Some things that people say in their scum game are their actual thought process which is non alignment indicative. But just because they said that in their scum game you end up reading them scum for it. Why is this particular thought process scummy?
In post 82, Soren wrote:Really? They appear to be easy questions that doesn't require much effort to me. I agree on your second read though.
I agree that they are easy questions that do not require much effort, but my thinking last night was that they are also questions that are easy to
forget
to ask. They're questions that don't immediately jump out to me as something that needs explanation, but then I read them and think, "yeah, you know, that is something worth pressing on". So my first gut read interpretation
is that lazy scum that's trying to blend in
(and not truly solve the game) would take those posts that she questioned at the surface level and not bother to press for details.
You said you got a town lean from those questions but now you say that you have a lazy scum read on it?
, you say not much is going on in Kop's ISO. What's going on in yours?
Not much
The is the thing about Not_mafia that makes it a displeasure to play with him. He doesn't even try in the game and he acknowledges his lack of effort but doesn't care to change it. However I feel like this play is pretty town. This is speaking from the top of my head, but unless he is onto something, I feel like there is a sense of carelessness in his town games. Like his read in his 88, I see him do that as town before.
= = = = = = = = = =
I feel like Kop's vote on not_mafia is going after an easy target. Not_mafia's play is so sketchy right now that it's so easy to pin him as scum simply based on a lack of town mentality. And I guess I'm slightly biased here too since I'm reading not_mafia as town. I would vote kop but that would put him at L-1 so I'm going to see what his response is first.
It may seem an easy target to you but you are clearly brushing it off as him playing as town. If he has done this in the past, do you believe that he may do the same thing as scum, and ride this all the way to the bank? Because it will be brushed off as his town town play. If he is going to play like that it's anti town and not helping.
Jesus bloody wept.
UNVOTE: Not mafia.
VOTE: Vedith
Reason: too much speculating about setups than actual scum hunting.
This is a good example of why Kop is a town read of mine. He explains his NM vote, then unvotes and continues to scumhunt Vedith. His Vedith vote is also packaged with clear logic.
Kop was less active in our last game when he was scum. He could be aware people would notice this, because there are a few other players from that game here.
The fact is I don't see any of his posts as scummy.
In post 207, Vedith wrote:Not at all, I'm just pointing out how often you are wrong.
In fact, the time you didn't think I was scum I was scum.
Don't try to meta me basically.
In post 199, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Frogger and NM are null right now.
I'm not liking frogger but the dispute with Vedith seems genuine. And Vedith is my biggest scum read right now.
In post 122, SilverWolf wrote:Kop looks like frustrated town to me. I'm really starting to dislike all the defense of NM this game.
In post 124, Not_Mafia wrote:Don't like kop buckling to the slightlest bit of pressure, looks like he just wants to go with the flow/least contraversial target at any given juncture
I'm not so sure.
I can see both perspectives but speaking from personal experience, I actually think it's more towny than scummy because that's how I react.
I'll often buckle under pressure, and my reads will be all over the place as town. As scum, I drive my mislynch through (see Ducky in BEES or goodmorning in refraction, although I did think GM was scum, I knew I wasn't lynching my faction in that which is all I cared about).
UNVOTE:
VOTE: vedith
Vote parking an RVS and not scumhunting, then being called out for it and being like "oh wait, I will scumhunt soon!" (paraphrasing).
ASP also pings me for one particular thing I don't want to divulge at this second to see how it plays out, but I don't think vedith and ASP are scum together for their interaction in 92, and ASP has at least pushed GL whereas vedith hasn't at all.
Last game you threw votes around, and what you are doing this game looks similar.
I bolded the part that disagrees with that.
You give an excuse for sporadic voting by saying you do it as town. I don't see that style of voting as town. And again, that was your exact style as scum in my last game with you.
In post 251, GrayFoxxxx wrote:He said was I scum for low activity. I argued that wasn't alignment indicative.
I guess. I didn't really pay attention D1 because you were pretty obvtown there.
Notice I didn't push you at all that game when you were town. The reason...I felt you were active. If I thought you were werewolf I probs would have pushed since I was mafia. I am not feeling town you now.
You felt I was active...
But I wasnt. It's why I was lynched what don't you get?
In post 251, GrayFoxxxx wrote:He said was I scum for low activity. I argued that wasn't alignment indicative.
I guess. I didn't really pay attention D1 because you were pretty obvtown there.
Notice I didn't push you at all that game when you were town. The reason...I felt you were active. If I thought you were werewolf I probs would have pushed since I was mafia. I am not feeling town you now.
You felt I was active...
But I wasnt. It's why I was lynched what don't you get?
What don't YOU get?
I said you were active and I could tell you were town so I didn't pay complete attention to you. I just knew you were active town.
I don't get how you say I was active, when I was lynched for being inactive.
In post 251, GrayFoxxxx wrote:He said was I scum for low activity. I argued that wasn't alignment indicative.
I guess. I didn't really pay attention D1 because you were pretty obvtown there.
Notice I didn't push you at all that game when you were town. The reason...I felt you were active. If I thought you were werewolf I probs would have pushed since I was mafia. I am not feeling town you now.
You felt I was active...
But I wasnt. It's why I was lynched what don't you get?
What don't YOU get?
I said you were active and I could tell you were town so I didn't pay complete attention to you. I just knew you were active town.
I don't get how you say I was active, when I was lynched for being inactive.
The point he is making, was that you were active, but actively scum hunting. This game, you aren't as active, and more ducking and diving, and a lot less scum hunting up until your wagon started.
I can see a difference in your game, and I'm sure others who played with you in that game, also can notice that.
Does that make the point clearer for you?
I was making a decision to be inactive that game. If you remember I expressed that thoroughly.
This game ive had rl things prevent me from really playing up until today.
All I did was bicker with scumtso D1 when I did post that game I didn't really get a chance to scumhunt anyone else.
In post 172, Fro99er wrote:
The fact that I haevn't noticed gray at all has me concerned. I've only played with town gray, and he was super involved both times.
I've played with town gray twice. The Delicious game you are talking about, we both played with him. He was being scumread for barely posting at all, then sheep voting and naked voted people, he claimed VT way too early and was bascially scummy for most of D1 until he got wagoned. When he did start giving content, he was very involved but by then he was being hard pushed by scum, everyone had been arguing way too much, and he was a compromise lynch. So he didn't really get involved until heavily pressured.
The last game I just got out of with him, he pulled the same thing as here, promising content and not delivering, getting snippy with me when I voted and pushed him over it, etc.
The only reason I backed off him was because I was the cop in that game and after one scum flipped and I outed the other with a guilty, I was able to figure out through voting patterns and associative tells that he wasn't scum.
IOW, he doesn't effort much as town and can be a bit of a VI but I will admit that he really put a ton of effort into Delicious when he was wagoned and close to a lynch.
I have no scum meta on him.
@grayfoxxxx-do you have any scum games on this site and can you link one if so?
I think I had 2 games going as scum when I site flaked. It's been about a year. I can look for them, ide like yours too
In post 219, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Last game you threw votes around, and what you are doing this game looks similar.
This is not true. Fro99er did not throw his vote around in that game as scum. He was kind of lurky in the beginning and voting people for weak reasons and I did not see too many vote switches like he's doing this game. Later, he was a lot more active and after his rough start, I was townreading him most of the game until I got killed by his scumteam.
So why the blatantly false meta read that I can easily refute?
I can show you where I called him on it. You don't have to agree but it's what I believed. Turns out I was right.
In post 219, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Last game you threw votes around, and what you are doing this game looks similar.
This is not true. Fro99er did not throw his vote around in that game as scum. He was kind of lurky in the beginning and voting people for weak reasons and I did not see too many vote switches like he's doing this game. Later, he was a lot more active and after his rough start, I was townreading him most of the game until I got killed by his scumteam.
So why the blatantly false meta read that I can easily refute?
I can show you where I called him on it. You don't have to agree but it's what I believed. Turns out I was right.
Sure, also have you played with Not_Mafia before? If so, can you link it?
I think I'm in a game with him now. Not sure if I've played with him before. I dont think som
In post 219, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Last game you threw votes around, and what you are doing this game looks similar.
This is not true. Fro99er did not throw his vote around in that game as scum. He was kind of lurky in the beginning and voting people for weak reasons and I did not see too many vote switches like he's doing this game. Later, he was a lot more active and after his rough start, I was townreading him most of the game until I got killed by his scumteam.
So why the blatantly false meta read that I can easily refute?
Ok this is blatantly false
Frogger changed votes 7 times D1... my point stands that she was throwing her vote around. It's not as much yet today, and this why it's not a solid scum read for me
In post 305, SilverWolf wrote:Yeah, I don't have much experience with him but I don't like the lurking, the fact that so many are giving him easy townreads and defending him and the L-1 on grayfoxxxx at first because he was sheeping your reasons without checking to see if they were accurate or not. Later, when he said he had the same experience with grayfoxxxx makes me feel better about that vote.
I could be wrong but I don't think I've played with NM before. Aside from one current game. So idk what he means...kinda wierd
In post 219, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Last game you threw votes around, and what you are doing this game looks similar.
This is not true. Fro99er did not throw his vote around in that game as scum. He was kind of lurky in the beginning and voting people for weak reasons and I did not see too many vote switches like he's doing this game. Later, he was a lot more active and after his rough start, I was townreading him most of the game until I got killed by his scumteam.
So why the blatantly false meta read that I can easily refute?
Ok this is blatantly false
Frogger changed votes 7 times D1... my point stands that she was throwing her vote around. It's not as much yet today, and this why it's not a solid scum read for me
Was he changing it on a whim like he's been doing here or was he explaining himself more? Is vote switching like that town or scum to you?
Also, checked the game you are in with NM and I feel better about his vote on you now. I can't elaborate on it though.
pedit: OK will look at those games as well.
In that case it was scummy. So I'm inclined to believe he would be scummy about it now. But then him saying his reads are all over the place as town bothers me. Meh idk yet.
I just don't know how he can townread me in a game I'm still involved in. That's all. Anyone could look on there own since it can't be discussed. I'm done talking about that
In post 328, SilverWolf wrote:
Holy crap, I am dense. The game is unfinished. There's no way he could say what he did about you unless he has another game where you were town and played that way.