In post 360, Lucky2u wrote:Her reaction to my hammer is such a show. She's looking for low hanging fruit. Her day vig was a fumble, iirc she shot against the consensus, so why did she even ask us to "vote"?
This sounds like you're just finding whatever reasons you can to say that ETL is scum after calling him scum instead of having those reasons first and then scum reading ETL for it.
In post 361, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I didn't shoot against census. I was deciding between suzune and gummy. I stated as such and both were considerable suspects among others. Second, I claimed all my cards and you can check them. I proved my vig, and you know my discard. So my third card proves my alignment. There's only one in the entire list and it's mine.
You haven't proven your alignment card I would say. However considering that you claimed rather early on, I would think that it's likely that you're telling the truth.
In post 365, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: In post 364, Lucky2u wrote:Claiming a one of a kind card as your alignment doesn't prove your alignment. I'm claiming compulsive child killer as my alignment card and there is only one of that card.
By your logic I am town cleared too.
The card you are claiming for alignment is something easily thrown away by scum or town players who know this setup (see my previous post on useless investigators) so you risked little by claiming it as your alignment card since if someone had it they probably would have tossed it.
No. You aren't. Because you haven't proven your role card. I have.
Ehh, doesn't the logic that you're using to say that you've proven your alignment card apply to Lucky as well?
In post 380, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:It's easy to claim two cards and switch them for role/alignment. I've proven my role already, so the possibility of my switching them for cred is non-existent. Not so in your case - by the way - you still haven't claimed all of your cards as requested.
Second, you only get aggressive and stupid with me when you're scum and I'm confident in my town reads elsewhere. You're hanging today. End of story.
Lucky has already claimed all his cards. Werewolf mason, town compulsive child and discarded mafia cupid.
You make a good point there about proving your role, which will then just leave your alignment. I would substantiate it to say that your alignment is proven, but I would say it's a good argument. One in which doesn't apply to Lucky in this case.
In post 419, Vedith wrote:Well, I think that there is either only 1 team/solo killer left after the no kill last night.
Lucky is only going at you because of what you said about him. I agree that it's wasting the day.
You are still in my town list. This is also down to the fact of your card claim (I believe you said town dayvig) and then Soren stated scum dayvig.
In your situation, I think it would have been a worth while gambit to have claimed scum dayvig with expecting no one else to get it, showing that you received a scum card increasing the chances of 2.
Ash's comment today has really struck me as odd and I'm surprised that no one else has picked up on it. It was rushed and forced as a comment. He's also voting onto CN just to draw easy focus.
I got town dayvig card.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Lucky vs ETL reads town vs town with Lucky on the short end of the argument and making his play look bad for pushing against a pretty strong town read for everyone.
Lucky nor ETL responded to my questions :c
I'm only really interested in lynching Vedith today. Reasons stated in my
317. I might compromise for a Chaotic lynch.
VOTE: Vedith
