Frozen Angel wrote:In post 19, Aristophanes wrote:Gambler's fallacy.In post 14, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 12, Jeanne11 wrote:VOTE: Ika for being a Godfather in the previous game, so chances are he' has the same role in this one.
and even said something mathematically considered Impossible :/ his chance for being a godfather in a game is 1/13. in this game is 1/169 thats really likely?!
The chances of getting Godfather this game are the exact same as the chances were last game. The prior game's outcome has absolutely no effect on the chances in this game.
You can thank Davsto for yelling this a lot in prior games. Beat the concept into my head.
well your right. he has a 1/13 chance to be a godfather in this game as well. but there is a 1/169 chance to be a godfather in both game. thats why I said its opposite of likely to be one and his logic sucks
This isn't correct. There is a 1/169 chance of being gf in two games in a row before the first game.
VOTE: jeanne
Anen stop with the cintent. Round here we play by mindless lynching based off of circumstancial evidence and unreliable testimony. Kind of like Phoenix Wright.