" Look, they were doing something awful to the planet and your mother couldn't stand it anymore. She told me that's why she had to turn on her own kind."
-Greg,The Return
Deadline
" Look, they were doing something awful to the planet and your mother couldn't stand it anymore. She told me that's why she had to turn on her own kind."
-Greg,The Return
In post 297, Reasonably Rational wrote:Has somebody who is actually voting her suggested that her playstyle is the reason why they're voting for her.
-Cerb
In post 299, Jeanne11 wrote:If she's town, how do you plan on being wrong?
In post 230, Reasonably Rational wrote:Oh man, 2 votes on you FA, and you are ready to flip out on us? It's D1, people don't need reasons to vote, didn't you know that?
-Cerb
In post 237, Errantparabola wrote:You are 100% right frozen angel.
I've been sort of tied up with another game so I just wanted to make a quick entrance.
Case is incoming right now
In post 18, Frozen Angel wrote:How could I know your not faking your massage?!
I know this is RVS, but I still didn't like this post.
first of all, it's hard to fake a massage. If you feel the pressure from the other person's hands, then it's probably real.
second of all, in no way is "not being able to know the truth behind someone's statements" alignment indicative. what that seems like to me is trying to undermine an early potential gamesolver and something that brings us out of RVS. Of course, in no way is farside town for the message deal, but in no way is scum either.
58
60
inconsistency in the tone/intent of these posts.
I remember someone saying that 60 is potentially town motivated because reaction gathering but I personally don't thnk it's indicative.
your 3dice case is ultimately just you quoting a bunch of posts and saying they're scum.
I personally believe that the "townread throwing" is absolutely null
In post 298, farside22 wrote:I'm not scum reading FA due to any emotions.
She'd being glib on purpose.
I asked about her vote on RR.
She got snarky response to my question.
I can tell because when I pushed further she basically acts like she isn't either reading post or she's posting crap and not scum hunting at all.
She didn't care about the wagon on RR, this is fact based on her asking others about there vote and then never caring about solving why there was a wagon.
In post 299, Jeanne11 wrote:If she's town, how do you plan on being wrong?
In post 301, Jeanne11 wrote:Again, that is the way she plays. If you're scum-reading based on that alone, shut up.There's also the fact that you're trying to kill the only person I want to ally/fuse with, thereby stopping that, thereby stopping any benefits I might gain from that.
In post 316, Jeanne11 wrote:Oh, I see how it is. The second I mention I have means to learn whether FA is scum, you instantly change the topic. I see how it is.....
In post 313, Jeanne11 wrote:Yes, I do. I believe that if one is wrong, one should apologize. Haven't your parents taught you that?
In post 314, Masters of Bull wrote:Farside.
Do you have any experience with 3dice?
We haven't talked yet and it's both of our last game!
In post 313, Jeanne11 wrote:Yes, I do. I believe that if one is wrong, one should apologize. Haven't your parents taught you that?
In post 320, Jeanne11 wrote:Because those voting/suspecting FA are trying to stop our alliance and I can't help but think it's essentially a scum agenda.
In post 321, farside22 wrote:In post 313, Jeanne11 wrote:Yes, I do. I believe that if one is wrong, one should apologize. Haven't your parents taught you that?
Everyone will be wrong about who is scum.
No one will ever be 100% accurate reads playing this game.
Apologizing for being wrong is just dumb
In post 314, Masters of Bull wrote:Farside.
Do you have any experience with 3dice?
We haven't talked yet and it's both of our last game!
Very limited experience. I've seen his scum read as a moderator.
Right now he's pretty null.