Open 623 (White Flag) - A Moment in Time (Over)

RhazhBash · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:58 am

Hi

VOTE: SirCakez because he's a furry weeb.

RhazhBash · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:28 am

In post 7, NotAnAlt wrote:I love your avatar, Titus

Question for everyone:
Given that this setup is white flag, what do you think of bussing in this game? Will scum do it? More importantly, would you do it if you were scum?

M8 if I were Mafia and it was down to 2 of us left I would definitely bus my partner. Bussing is a pro strategy.

RhazhBash · Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:01 am

Best to just play the game naturally instead of planning out our strategies D1. If I don't know what I'm doing the Mafia surely can't counter my play.

RhazhBash · Post Post #20 (isolation #3) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:15 am

In post 18, Titus wrote:
In post 17, RhazhBash wrote:Best to just play the game naturally instead of planning out our strategies D1. If I don't know what I'm doing the Mafia surely can't counter my play.

I think you're scum with SS. Discuss.

I think you're wrong. Discuss.

Seriously I'm still in D1 shenanigans mode why are you looking into this?

RhazhBash · Post Post #24 (isolation #4) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:19 am

SS how exactly are you coming to that conclusion?

RhazhBash · Post Post #27 (isolation #5) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:22 am

In post 25, Something_Smart wrote:Lol you guys realize 21 was a joke right.

In post 22, SirCakez wrote:Vote on SS is now serious.

Interesting. Explain?

It definitely didn't sound like a joke. Now I feel like you're trying to cover your ass.

RhazhBash · Post Post #36 (isolation #6) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:04 am

I don't like how Phantom tries to force his playstyle and not let it come naturally, but that isn't necessarily alignment indicative either. Besides it's best to not tell the Mafia what they can and can't get away with.

RhazhBash · Post Post #41 (isolation #7) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:46 am

In post 40, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 33, TheCow wrote:VOTE: AI
first player on the player list is scum 60% of the time, every time.
I am confirmed town right now. Scum.

Seems legit

RhazhBash · Post Post #114 (isolation #8) » Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:13 am

In post 70, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Rhazh
Attacking people without voting to support it, making unprompted references to what the scum want or do, inconsistencies in play. Overall feels like he is trying to fit in and play like everyone else is.

I'm sorry I'm more used to a different site where the meta isn't to vote whoever you push. Speaking of I'd like to see if there actually are any associative tells against me in 3 pages, because I sure as hell don't see them.

RhazhBash · Post Post #193 (isolation #9) » Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:53 am

I'm about to reread the thread and look more into a few people's ISOs, but just a quick note. I've played enough games with SirCakez to say this. If Cakez is playing like Town, he's scum. If he's playing like garbage, he's Town. Believe me on this I've seen him play amazing as scum and terribad at Town.

RhazhBash · Post Post #202 (isolation #10) » Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:23 am

I'd have to agree with Cakez here. Sounds like your regular Town Cakez to me. @SS Cakez is someone that posts legitimate reads without always posting his reasons. Even as Town. I've played enough with him to know that this is Town SirCakez.

RhazhBash · Post Post #203 (isolation #11) » Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:26 am

VOTE: AI

Yeah no saying Town are confident isn't a scum tell unless you want to use it to back up a case of IIoA or something. Also your read on me is 100% bullshit fishing for Town cred.

RhazhBash · Post Post #207 (isolation #12) » Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:48 am

SS how many times are you gonna say you weren't serious after you get called out on something?

RhazhBash · Post Post #211 (isolation #13) » Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:03 am

In post 28, Something_Smart wrote:So you think I'm dumb enough to pull out a serious associative tell on page 1.
Noted.

In post 57, Something_Smart wrote:Cause it was a joke
Relax, titus

In post 205, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 197, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 196, Something_Smart wrote:I'm almost never confident day 1.
But that doesn't mean I don't have reasons.
And I haven't changed any of those reads. I voted Rhazh because he was mildly scummy. Then you were scummier so I voted you. Then AI was scummier so I voted him.
You're basically saying that once you have one scumread you should ignore everyone else and death tunnel that person. That's antitown.
I agree with you man.

This is disgusting buddying.

In post 198, SirCakez wrote:
In post 70, Something_Smart wrote:VOTE: Rhazh
Attacking people without voting to support it, making unprompted references to what the scum want or do, inconsistencies in play. Overall feels like he is trying to fit in and play like everyone else is.

This doesn't sound like "mildly scummy".

I'm sorry I don't have your magical ability to discern town from scum on page 3, but for me anyway scumreads that early can only be so serious.

RhazhBash · Post Post #274 (isolation #14) » Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:06 am

In post 269, pistachi0n wrote:Rhazh: You were saying earlier that you're townreading Cakez based on meta. Can you link me to some games that will illustrate your point?

http://www.blankmediagames.com/phpbb/vi ... 17&t=34298

Catching up rn.

RhazhBash · Post Post #276 (isolation #15) » Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:19 am

SirCakez is clearly Town. Ignoring my "he plays bad as Town joke", he normally tries to hide in the background and give much weaker opinions. I can tell here that he's actually scumhunting and not faking it for Town cred. Also AI your reads list is bad.