Mini 1771 - Legend of Zelda Mafia: Storm the Castle Endgame

Toogeloo · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:51 am

In post 645, Cookie Bakers wrote:Even when I am telling you that I will murder Toog unless people object, you can't even muster a comment beyond Toog isn't the lynch for today.

I wish you'd stop with the foreplay and shoot me already... oh wait, dayvig claims are probably the most common lies told on day 1. I got nothing to worry about, not like you had the balls to do it anyways.

clearance only · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:52 am

Toog, why is dav a scumlean?

What is your flavor?

Why did you believe the dayvig if you know that they're normally bullshit?

ISO · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:53 am

Who the hell is WKing me? The only one I see town reading me is Titus.

Toogeloo · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:56 am

In post 651, clearance only wrote:Toog, why is dav a scumlean?

What is your flavor?

Why did you believe the dayvig if you know that they're normally bullshit?

Dav's jestering for the most part is a turn off.
I'm the happy mask salesman.
I never believe dayvig claims. It's fun to entertain them though.

Tits is about as likely to be a Dayvig as I am a Ninja Godfather.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:56 am

@Clevage, I have responded to your shitty case. I apologize for not replying to every comment where you whine about the wrong lynch being so hard.

You meanwhile aren't even taking a stance on Toog Mirhawk or Nahdia or Dwlee or anyone who actually reacted to my push on Toog.

I also think you don't understand how a white knight works. Scum set people up to take falls. They aren't blantant and direct. It's more...gee the wagon looks nice but I cannot.

~Titus

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:58 am

Sensei, you oughta know by now that I don't bluff.

~Titus

ISO · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:03 am

I think I may be horribly misinterpreting what a white knight is <.<

clearance only · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:05 am

Cookie Bakers wrote:I have responded to your shitty case. I apologize for not replying to every comment where you whine about the wrong lynch being so hard.

My case is not shitty.

Cookie Bakers wrote:You meanwhile aren't even taking a stance on Toog Mirhawk or Nahdia or Dwlee or anyone who actually reacted to my push on Toog.

I've taken stances on literally ALL of these people. And I fail to understand what relevance the fact that they responded to your "push" on toog has at all on their alignment or mine.

Cookie Bakers wrote:I also think you don't understand how a white knight works. Scum set people up to take falls. They aren't blantant and direct. It's more...gee the wagon looks nice but I cannot.

Please, I pretty much invented the term.

clearance only · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:06 am

In post 656, SirCakez wrote:I think I may be horribly misinterpreting what a white knight is <.<

There isn't really a single set-in-stone definition and what makes it scummy is a case by case thing.

Phoenix Wright · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:15 am

In post 656, SirCakez wrote:I think I may be horribly misinterpreting what a white knight is <.<

It's when you keep agreeing with someone and acting like they're the greatest

ISO · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:20 am

I thought that was buddying. I always thought white knighting was when some townie is getting wagoned and scum goes in and defends them to gain their favor in reads in the future.

clearance only · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:21 am

VOTE: Davsto

clearance only · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:22 am

In post 660, SirCakez wrote:I thought that was buddying. I always thought white knighting was when some townie is getting wagoned and scum goes in and defends them to gain their favor in reads in the future.

More or less.
Context, though.

Davsto · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:24 am

In post 643, clearance only wrote:
In post 640, Davsto wrote:If you are implying what I think you're implying here

What do you think I'm implying here?

That me and SirCakez are scum partners?

In post 645, Cookie Bakers wrote:Scum are white knighting the fuck out of SirCakez. It's not just "effort" that indicates whether a player has no partners.

So, uh, he was really easy to get a wagon on but scum were white knighting him?

...

..?

In post 653, Toogeloo wrote:jestering

The fuck?

In post 660, SirCakez wrote:I thought that was buddying. I always thought white knighting was when some townie is getting wagoned and scum goes in and defends them to gain their favor in reads in the future.

I'm like 90% sure that is what white knighting is. That's why I'm confused as to Titus yelling at me when I was saying basically the same thing she was; that SirCakez was hard to get a wagon on.

cleavage only wrote:VOTE: Davsto

you vote me, i'll vote trump

Phoenix Wright · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:24 am

In post 660, SirCakez wrote:I thought that was buddying. I always thought white knighting was when some townie is getting wagoned and scum goes in and defends them to gain their favor in reads in the future.

I guess?

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:31 am

@Clevage, Your thoughts on them didn't change based on their posts in thread. Some you didn't comment on. Nahdia's post for instance is terrible. It's like you want to ignore what happened.

Oh and yes your push on Cakes is bad. There's a difference between white knighting and scum just not wanting to be part of a mislynch. A white knight is more about posturing and making themselves look good. That's why I am annoyed with you for not seeing that.

Then again, you just unvoted Cakey. So yippie.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:32 am

@Dave, you're British though. :/

Davsto · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:33 am

In post 666, Cookie Bakers wrote:@Dave, you're British though. :/

All the worse.

clearance only · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:34 am

In post 665, Cookie Bakers wrote:@Clevage, Your thoughts on them didn't change based on their posts in thread. Some you didn't comment on. Nahdia's post for instance is terrible. It's like you want to ignore what happened.

Which of nahdia's posts didn't you like?

ISO · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:35 am

Sensei why did you just move your vote so easily after tunneling me for 10+ pages?

clearance only · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:36 am

Trust me it wasn't easy.

ISO · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:38 am

It sure looked really easy.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:38 am

In post 598, Nahdia wrote:Jesus Toog time to backtrack yo.

This one. It reeks of scum meaning to post in a PT or scum coaching but when would nahdia ever coach Toog? Noobs generally don't coach seasoned vets.

clearance only · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:39 am

...I can move it back if you want?

clearance only · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:43 am

In post 672, Cookie Bakers wrote:This one. It reeks of scum meaning to post in a PT or scum coaching but when would nahdia ever coach Toog? Noobs generally don't coach seasoned vets.

Mmmkay.
Trust, it's not a great post.
But that seems like a pretty large reach.