Mini 1771 - Legend of Zelda Mafia: Storm the Castle Endgame

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #750 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:02 am

In post 747, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 604, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog, Was I not clear? We threatened to dayvig you. We want your reads, and claim,not for you to act like a jelly fish and say it's ok if you're lynched.

~Titus

Reads is one thing, but would you explain to me why you would threaten to vig him if he didn't claim?

In post 672, Cookie Bakers wrote:In post 598, Nahdia wrote:
Jesus Toog time to backtrack yo.

This one. It reeks of scum meaning to post in a PT or scum coaching but when would nahdia ever coach Toog? Noobs generally don't coach seasoned vets.

Actually, it just reeks of flippancy. You yourself answered why the second possibility is a reach, and, unless nahdia can't tell the difference between purple and black, the first possibility is even more of a reach.

Claiming is a precursor to dayvigging. I don't want to Derp vig a mason or cop or something.

~Titus

clearance only · Post Post #751 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:03 am

Titus I quoted a post where you hinted at it before hand that you're conveniently ignoring.

clearance only · Post Post #752 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:03 am

beeboy · Post Post #753 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:04 am

In post 749, SirCakez wrote:
In post 740, Phoenix Wright wrote:It's pretty funny that as soon as we're really close to lynching sir cakez everyone suddenly tries to put the pressure on cleavage lol

Who's pressuring him? He's not even being voted.

beeboy wrote:{Dwlee99, Cookie Bakers,}

Explain these please.

Dwlee's tone this game suggest he is town to me. Imo it is a gut read honestly
CB's claim is way too pro\/able to come from scum and if I am wrong on this they made a pro\/able claim so who really cares?

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #754 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:04 am

In post 751, clearance only wrote:Titus I quoted a post where he hinted at it before hand that you're conveniently ignoring.

Where?

Phoenix Wright · Post Post #755 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:06 am

In post 749, SirCakez wrote:
In post 740, Phoenix Wright wrote:It's pretty funny that as soon as we're really close to lynching sir cakez everyone suddenly tries to put the pressure on cleavage lol

Who's pressuring him? He's not even being voted.

beeboy wrote:{Dwlee99, Cookie Bakers,}

Explain these please.

The last few pages were just everyone arguing with cleavage and trying to make it seem like their posts suck. Is that not pressure?

clearance only · Post Post #756 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:07 am

In post 717, clearance only wrote:
In post 621, clearance only wrote:
In post 476, Toogeloo wrote:
In post 474, clearance only wrote:It's a role madness mate.
Where'd you get this idea from?

Toog being town or not rides pretty much if he's
1) capable of faking this
2) was preemptively preparing to fakeclaim VT and next level everyone with one of the best things to fakeclaim as scum in a game full of power roles

It's enough to say he's probably not the lynch for today.

Where he asks me this.
You can argue that he was laying it on thick or something but the narrative checks out imo.

Make sure that before you tell people to read the thread you read the thread.

clearance only · Post Post #757 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:07 am

In post 755, Phoenix Wright wrote:The last few pages were just everyone arguing with cleavage and trying to make it seem like their posts suck. Is that not pressure?

No that's just discrediting.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #758 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:07 am

I think cleavage is town.

Xkfyu · Post Post #759 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:12 am

In post 736, clearance only wrote:What's on your mind?

You are on my mind, because of the fact that I've been town reading you for a long time now. However, you keep hinting at me being scum, but when I respond to you, you make no real attempt at anything. It makes me feel like your opinion isn't genuine, and that is concerning.

In post 736, clearance only wrote:What do you think of Dav's vote this page?

If you're asking me what do I think about the fact that he voted Cookie, then I have no problem with that. I'm null on Cookie, and would be willing to lynch them. But honestly, I'd be willing to lynch a lot of people right now.

Now, if you're asking me about the content...well, there is none. But, there seems to be a lot of that going around. Especially lately.

Does this post bother you at all?

In post 740, Phoenix Wright wrote:It's pretty funny that as soon as we're really close to lynching sir cakez everyone suddenly tries to put the pressure on cleavage lol

Xkfyu · Post Post #760 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:15 am

In post 737, beeboy wrote:461: ewwww

That's not really a proper description of a post. It sounds like you're just trying to make it look bad without having to explain it.

So, would you mind explaining what it was that you didn't like about it?

ISO · Post Post #761 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:16 am

In post 755, Phoenix Wright wrote:
In post 749, SirCakez wrote:
In post 740, Phoenix Wright wrote:It's pretty funny that as soon as we're really close to lynching sir cakez everyone suddenly tries to put the pressure on cleavage lol

Who's pressuring him? He's not even being voted.

beeboy wrote:{Dwlee99, Cookie Bakers,}

Explain these please.

The last few pages were just everyone arguing with cleavage and trying to make it seem like their posts suck. Is that not pressure?

That's not pressure, that's just arguing.

beeboy wrote:
CB's claim is way too pro\/able to come from scum and if I am wrong on this they made a pro\/able claim so who really cares?

CB didn't claim....

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #762 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:16 am

Hey, Clevage, are you going to reply or not?

My whole complaint was that Toog is narrative selling in his claim. You're promising me a post where he hinted at VT before confirming massclaim. Where is it?

Xkfyu · Post Post #763 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:17 am

In post 750, Cookie Bakers wrote:
In post 747, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 604, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog, Was I not clear? We threatened to dayvig you. We want your reads, and claim,not for you to act like a jelly fish and say it's ok if you're lynched.

~Titus

Reads is one thing, but would you explain to me why you would threaten to vig him if he didn't claim?

In post 672, Cookie Bakers wrote:In post 598, Nahdia wrote:
Jesus Toog time to backtrack yo.

This one. It reeks of scum meaning to post in a PT or scum coaching but when would nahdia ever coach Toog? Noobs generally don't coach seasoned vets.

Actually, it just reeks of flippancy. You yourself answered why the second possibility is a reach, and, unless nahdia can't tell the difference between purple and black, the first possibility is even more of a reach.

Claiming is a precursor to dayvigging. I don't want to Derp vig a mason or cop or something.

~Titus

But...you weren't going to dayvig him.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #764 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:18 am

In post 761, SirCakez wrote:
In post 755, Phoenix Wright wrote:
In post 749, SirCakez wrote:
In post 740, Phoenix Wright wrote:It's pretty funny that as soon as we're really close to lynching sir cakez everyone suddenly tries to put the pressure on cleavage lol

Who's pressuring him? He's not even being voted.

beeboy wrote:{Dwlee99, Cookie Bakers,}

Explain these please.

The last few pages were just everyone arguing with cleavage and trying to make it seem like their posts suck. Is that not pressure?

That's not pressure, that's just arguing.

beeboy wrote:
CB's claim is way too pro\/able to come from scum and if I am wrong on this they made a pro\/able claim so who really cares?

CB didn't claim....

We'll be on the record then.

One shot anytime vig.

clearance only · Post Post #765 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:19 am

Him asking me where I got the idea that this was role madness

is

hinting at VT.
Are you arguing that's not true?
Are you now arguing that he was "narrative selling" or slipped in narrative?

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #766 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:19 am

In post 763, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 750, Cookie Bakers wrote:
In post 747, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 604, Cookie Bakers wrote:Toog, Was I not clear? We threatened to dayvig you. We want your reads, and claim,not for you to act like a jelly fish and say it's ok if you're lynched.

~Titus

Reads is one thing, but would you explain to me why you would threaten to vig him if he didn't claim?

In post 672, Cookie Bakers wrote:In post 598, Nahdia wrote:
Jesus Toog time to backtrack yo.

This one. It reeks of scum meaning to post in a PT or scum coaching but when would nahdia ever coach Toog? Noobs generally don't coach seasoned vets.

Actually, it just reeks of flippancy. You yourself answered why the second possibility is a reach, and, unless nahdia can't tell the difference between purple and black, the first possibility is even more of a reach.

Claiming is a precursor to dayvigging. I don't want to Derp vig a mason or cop or something.

~Titus

But...you weren't going to dayvig him.

What part of Titus doesn't bluff do you not understand?

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #767 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:21 am

In post 765, clearance only wrote:Him asking me where I got the idea that this was role madness
is
hinting at VT.
Are you arguing that's not true?
Are you now arguing that he was "narrative selling" or slipped in narrative?

No it frankly isn't. It's asking you to out information regarding PRs and if he is a VT, it's terrible posting.

Who do you scumread besides Cakez/Toog? Can you meet me anywhere plausible?

Xkfyu · Post Post #768 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:22 am

In post 766, Cookie Bakers wrote:What part of Titus doesn't bluff do you not understand?

None of it. I understand it completely. I just don't believe it.

Mostly, because of this:

In post 698, Cookie Bakers wrote:Why should I?

The time to trigger a day shot if town is to use it as a dual lynch?

So you want me to shoot Toog, vote him.

but there was something else I saw that made me think that you were bluffing, as well.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #769 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:23 am

Not bluffing.

Shiro and I have a joint anytime vig. One of our scumreads will not live to see tomorrow. We are just going to be as pro town as possible about it.

clearance only · Post Post #770 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:25 am

In post 759, Xkfyu wrote:You are on my mind, because of the fact that I've been town reading you for a long time now. However, you keep hinting at me being scum, but when I respond to you, you make no real attempt at anything. It makes me feel like your opinion isn't genuine, and that is concerning.

You've been basically a lurksack so far. If you feel like I haven't made an attempt at "anything" it's probably because I either didn't feel a need to respond because you were talking to me about how I shouldn't be scumreading Mirhawk for his shit vote on me earlier which is a pointless line of dialogue in the first place or I forgot that you existed.
You're not a strong scumread.
But the wishy-washy way you're coming at me here isn't making it go away.

Xkfyu · Post Post #771 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:25 am

In post 769, Cookie Bakers wrote:Not bluffing.

Shiro and I have a joint anytime vig. One of our scumreads will not live to see tomorrow. We are just going to be as pro town as possible about it.

Ok, you'll have to excuse my hydra ignorance, but that's worded funny and I want to make sure that I'm not missing something.

You just mean that your slot is a 1-shot anytime Vigilante, right?

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #772 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:27 am

Our target is guaranteed to die if we shoot at night and I am presuming no day bulletproof.

So yup. That's it.

clearance only · Post Post #773 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:28 am

In post 759, Xkfyu wrote:Does this post bother you at all?

I'm more bothered by him asking me "how are you so sure" when I said toog would flip town earlier tbh.
Why does that bother you? Should it bother me?

Xkfyu · Post Post #774 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:30 am

In post 770, clearance only wrote:
In post 759, Xkfyu wrote:You are on my mind, because of the fact that I've been town reading you for a long time now. However, you keep hinting at me being scum, but when I respond to you, you make no real attempt at anything. It makes me feel like your opinion isn't genuine, and that is concerning.

You've been basically a lurksack so far. If you feel like I haven't made an attempt at "anything" it's probably because I either didn't feel a need to respond because you were talking to me about how I shouldn't be scumreading Mirhawk for his shit vote on me earlier which is a pointless line of dialogue in the first place or I forgot that you existed.
You're not a strong scumread.
But the wishy-washy way you're coming at me here isn't making it go away.

I'm certainly not as active as some, but other than you Cakez, and PW, I haven't made significantly fewer posts than anyone. Especially since I was mostly V/LA for the weekend. So, you are vastly exaggerating. Honestly, I'm not concerned with your scum read on me. I'm concerned with my town read on you. So, trying to imply that the way I'm coming at you is going to make you continue to scum read isn't going to convince me to stop coming at you.