Micro: 595 Jmo's obsession with boxes (game over)

yessiree · Post Post #24 (isolation #0) » Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:59 pm

pisskop + hiplop

gg guys I called it first

VOTE: hiplop

yessiree · Post Post #46 (isolation #1) » Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:31 am

Am i the only one here that thinks hiplop is scummy as fuck for his forced labelling emos as being "defensive" for what could only be described as questioning the motive to the votes on her at best?

Lane falls into that category as well, kisspop too, but to a lesser degree

yessiree · Post Post #58 (isolation #2) » Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:42 am

In post 53, pisskop wrote:
In post 46, yessiree wrote:Am i the only one here that thinks hiplop is scummy as fuck for his forced labelling emos as being "defensive" for what could only be described as questioning the motive to the votes on her at best?

Lane falls into that category as well, kisspop too, but to a lesser degree

You dont see her as defending herself to an obnoxious extreme degree?

hardly

In post 54, lane0168 wrote:
In post 46, yessiree wrote:Am i the only one here that thinks hiplop is scummy as fuck for his forced labelling emos as being "defensive" for what could only be described as questioning the motive to the votes on her at best?

Lane falls into that category as well, kisspop too, but to a lesser degree

Questioning the motives of rvs? Yeah you're the only one.

yes you can question motives during rvs, it's the art of catching scums by their opening post. Perhaps you are new to this notion but it exists and it's proven to work. Doing so doesn't really fall into what you describe as hard defense of oneself, but we obviously start on opposite ends of the spectrum so i guess it's only natural to arrive at different conclusions