Mini 1766: SCP Foundation Mafia (GAME OVER)

[Elsa and Anna]

Probably Klingon or Flubber.

[Raskolnikov]

I really don't see shos-flubber but shos-klingon makes sense when I think about it.
We don't actually have confirmation of klingon's role because it's shos that vouched for him yesterday without receiving anything (still not explained), and its shos that claims to have received his message today.
If that's the case it would also allow klingon to be the person to have prevented me from visiting last night because he wasn't actually confirmed as having done something else.

[Raskolnikov]

Shos why did you vouch for him day 2 without receiving anything?

[Elsa and Anna]

Sometihng's telling me Shos wouldn't go that ball to the wall defending a scumbuddy.

I think it is in fact Shos/Flubber.

[Raskolnikov]

If I look at 1118 I see shos at L-1 and flubber essentially discouraging the counterwagon.

Earlier than that there is EE and shos having an interaction about EE being visited by shos in a puppy visit. It was early in the day and shos wasn't under much pressure at the time and I think it's really creative and strange to do if they were both scum.
If shos had such an ability why not use it on someone town?
Although if they were scum together shos wouldn't actually have that ability: he would not use it night 1 on his partner and then night 2 on the person they targeted to kill (this was his claimed last night target).
But why fake-claim a fruit vendor if you can't actually use it? As days carried on, wouldn't people be upset as they found themselves wanting for fruit? Because that's pretty much the case if shos-flubber are scum together like you think.

OTOH Klingon putting shos to L-1 there is fine if they were scum together though if you expect the claim to be beneficial and stop the wagon. Klingon hops off in 1122 in a way that I could see if they were scum.

Still, even if it makes sense I feel as though something doesn't add up, like I'm missing something.

[Elsa and Anna]

I think that Shos is in fact a fruit vendor and that they visited each other in order to get this 'BUT WHY WOULD HE NOT PROVE HIMSELF AS SCUM' thing further down the line when he actually visits town.

Who did he visit overnight again?

[Raskolnikov]

1184

[Elsa and Anna]

why the fuck did shos target the ascetic claim for something like that.

so yeah, scum.

maybe he isn't actually a fruit vendor?

[shos]

Yes. I'm a fruit vendor with especially good hearing.

About my results - I don't get them. My PM said basically I say the result out loud and someone with good hearing gets the result, while I forget what I said.

I think Klingon was roleblocked N1.
D2 she said someone with good hearing gets the result - so I figured this then. Now, after N2 I got the result, I am 100% sure she is town.

My fruit vendor ability is completely irrelevant to this.
N1 I played with eagle (confirmed) and N2 I literally foprgot the ascetic claim. Hence why I keep asking for claims list.


I have busy days, that's why this game is sorta not my best play lately. But either way, klingon is town, I am town.

[Raskolnikov]

She was roleblocked night 1.

[Raskolnikov]

I was wondering why you vouched for her when you couldn't actually have gotten anything
but this "good hearing" thing makes sense with the dog I guess

[Raskolnikov]

I also thought she could have been fakeclaiming because if you claim to invest a dead person I wasn't sure if something like that would even give a result (be verifyable), and targeting dead again next night is pretty unlucky.

But I think in light of this she is probably town with that role. But if her results only went to shos and shos was scum then it would be an entirely useless role.
So I guess shos is town after all?

Huh.

[Elsa and Anna]

I want to reconsider Raskol/Shos again.

[Raskolnikov]

I don't know if this confirms them both as town, but if it does scum is then dream man and either ARS or flubbernugget. I don't think it could be ARS+flub.

[shos]

I want to reconsider Raskol/Shos again.

Gtfo of the tunnel brooooooo

[Elsa and Anna]

I want to reconsider Raskol/Shos again.

Gtfo of the tunnel brooooooo

VOTE: elsa and anna

[Elsa and Anna]

Yeah, it's Rask/Shos.

[Raskolnikov]

lol

[shos]

Elsa
Flavor claim please

[A Real Scourge]

prodge

[Davsto]

VC 3.4

Elsa and Anna (2): shos, Klingoncelt
shos (2): Elsa and Anna, A Real Scourge
Klingoncelt (2): Flubbernugget, Raskolnikov
Raskolnikov (1): Dream Man

With 7 alive, it is 4 to lynch. Deadline in (expired on 2016-04-04 17:00:00).

[Davsto]

SnarkySnowman has reached the time limit for a third prod and is as such being replaced.

[Flubbernugget]

So uhh

We're still ignoring that asinine klingon claim

Cool!

[shos]

Flubber are you reading the game

[Dream Man]

I'm not townreading Flubber but Scourge lying about her role can only be scum with Shos which means that Flubber is town and telling the truth.
And lynching an investigative to prove their results is just asinine.

My apologies for misreading the situation, but it had appeared to me that nobody was townreading Flubber.

Scourge is unlikely to be lying about her role; although I cannot vouch for her confirmation with shos, I am certainly able to confirm that her result obtained on me is accurate.

I am more concerned of the fact that Raskol appears to be reasonably incriminated by a highly circumstantial guilty; though not downright solid evidence that would immediately confirm a lynch, but a discrepancy that has yet to be resolved, and the explanation still unclear.

And, if one believes that I am lying about this fact, I can only simply disprove this foolish view. One first, must explain the public nature of my Role, indicating "1" (player has visited myself), with nobody counterclaiming the announcement. Secondly, one must explain how I would be able to divine that Raskol's claim of visit onto myself would not have a definitive result, that is, he would not be able to know whether he was roleblocked or not. The fact of the matter is that Raskol modeled his claim after I had made my reveal, and with a one or two days delay; this certainly points strongly towards Raskol lying rather than myself. Indeed, one with a rationale mind can only conclude that the information that I have revealed with regards to today's role interactions could be nothing but the truth.

So, unless any of you would like to construct a plausible explanation for how I would be able to have planned all this ahead of time, I thank you for the compliment, but it must be said that such ideas are nonsense and this will be the last I shall speak about this matter.