THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
Oh man, I want to start an argument about how whether something is considered "good" or not is subjective, and that assuming you have the power of objectivity in the matter is fallacious, as it is am impossible stance to take, since your objectivity in what is "good" is based on your own subjectivity. but that would be a ridiculous thing to do so I think I'll refrain from that.
In post 2384, Aristophanes wrote:Oh man, I want to start an argument about how whether something is considered "good" or not is subjective, and that assuming you have the power of objectivity in the matter is fallacious, as it is am impossible stance to take, since your objectivity in what is "good" is based on your own subjectivity. but that would be a ridiculous thing to do so I think I'll refrain from that.
To avoid the ridiculousness of it all, we appointed someone to be the subjective standard-bearer to determine what is good and what is not.
In post 2384, Aristophanes wrote:Oh man, I want to start an argument about how whether something is considered "good" or not is subjective, and that assuming you have the power of objectivity in the matter is fallacious, as it is am impossible stance to take, since your objectivity in what is "good" is based on your own subjectivity. but that would be a ridiculous thing to do so I think I'll refrain from that.
To avoid the ridiculousness of it all, we appointed someone to be the subjective standard-bearer to determine what is good and what is not.
That person is SleepyKrew.
We failed to avoid the ridiculousness.
I shan't argue with the establishment about it! That would be dumb!
But really, I merely enjoy confronting people about their over-inflated self-righteousness on issues like this in a passive aggressive matter.
Probably stemming from my introspective realization that I lack such an ego and am therefore more open to others' viewpoints.
So don't mind me!
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
So I'm going to lay out some of the implicit rules that I've been fairying by, and I'm going to add them to the OP because apparently they need to be made explicit now.
A shitty joke title suggestion is okay. Don't spam them.
A non-title related one-off joke post is okay if it's not distracting from title discussion.
A bunch of non-title related posts aren't okay. Obviously.
I've been pretty damn lenient with this stuff so far. I don't want to be strict about discussion. I'm going to try to stay lenient about discussion. If I haven't personally told you that your posting is an issue, then you're fine. Keep up the good work, you.
I'm going to leave the thread locked until I hear back about vonflare and Aristophanes.