Yeah, I know it's stale. I honestly don't think I like it anymore either.In post 943, Gorkington wrote:ari.
you need to give reads.
stop just asking questions yo, cause your fire vote is getting stale.
do you like it still or no?
response to ircherstuff will probably come tomorrow because i dont particularly want to parse it all tonight.
I know I know.Gorkington wrote:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this felt like a really poor, vapid explanation for callign it a town post. feels like u were just looking for an excuse to call it towny with ur "mmm yess it isn't toooooooooooo narrow" crap lolIn post 905, Ircher wrote:In post 171, Gorkington wrote:do you disagree that smudger's wagon still being a thing is related to his entrance?In post 162, Xkfyu wrote:Most (3 out of 4) of Smudgers votes accumulated before he even made his first post, so why are you connecting his entrance with his wagon?
y/n?
if y, why ask such a pointless question.
if n, why are you being wrong at me?
lack of reaction to the rest of the wagon.xk wrote:Also, why do you believe that he won't react until his wagon's momentum slows down?
yes and maybe.xkfyu wrote:You just gonna scum read me and ignore my questions?
because.xkfyu wrote:And why is M&B "untouchable" today?
This is a town-motivated post. There is focused questioning, yet at the same time, the focus isn't too narrow.
even if i was being hypocritical (this was just a misunderstanding) WHAT'S UR POINT? this feels like something u threw out for 0 reason. do u think beign a hypocrite about ew posts is alignment indicative?????????????????????In post 930, Ircher wrote:In post 112, androgybee wrote:Nope ur wrong.
Gork is towny in opening. Your entrance involved an "ewwww" post which are seriously the most fucking stupid things I see on this site and I can't fucking stand them. Stop it. Stop it. You're not funny. You're not coy. You're not original. You're not even helpful. You're just being a fucking annoying whiney brat. Christ all fucking mighty please stop being so dumb.
You're wrong btw we're town and there was nothing even remotely scummy about posts you're trying to throw shade at so try again, freakin lamer. Or at the very least use your fucking words instead of being a total brat and just making disapproving noises.
~Nahdia
I find this very hypocritucal considering you made an eww post as your very first post.
reads.In post 959, androgybee wrote:gork i saw u wanted more contribution from our slot ill try tonight though i do have stuff to do so we'll see if i procrastinate it or not. ii dont know. what exactly do u want from me? ask and u shall receive. sry im not being more PROACTIVE.
In post 956, androgybee wrote:like uhg i know you might still be town i just ahte that the onyl reason im considering it is because ur predecessor was so freaking towny ffs
They are just really null. I don't see anything they've done as alignment indicative.In post 954, Gorkington wrote:i feel like you need to take a step back and really look at the players in the game in isolation or something.
because i dont feel like youre gonna get into this by asking questions yoh.
take a hard stance on someone and push it.
you dont like minsc wagon?
okay.
is it just that theyre leaning null to you? or are you reading them as town?
are you reading the pushers as scummy?
what is it?
In post 962, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have a sudden desire not to lynch Titus and I know it's probably wrong and I know I've done this before when she's been scum and it's fucked me over
but can we lynch XK first?
Ircher wrote:In post 956, androgybee wrote:like uhg i know you might still be town i just ahte that the onyl reason im considering it is because ur predecessor was so freaking towny ffs
Also:Metadive me
I hate it when you take stances like this because it makes you impossible to read..In post 966, Gorkington wrote:im tempted to not be okay with any other wagon because theyre a claimed vt.
but that might be silly.
In post 969, Not_Mafia wrote:Ircher why?