In post 1523, iraonavp wrote:
In post 1515, Drixx wrote:You're stuck in confirmation bias Something_Smart. If I left my vote on KaaG, you would call it a vanity vote or an attempt to dodge VCA or some shit like that. The day is running out and an actual wagon is happening; I asked why even though I knew asking why could possibly be to my own detriment, and there wasn't much for answers, as people were bizarrely confused by me using the phrase "look a gift horse in the mouth" and talked about that instead ... but we aren't going to gain anything by a no lynch.
I'm not going to use (or not) my vote trying to decipher what you think I should or shouldn't do. You need to re-assess your priors and get the fuck out of confbias mode.
Do you actually think SnarkySnowman is scum-aligned?
I don't understand what the phrase you used in the first quote means, but I would interpret it as "everyone else is voting snarky snowman so thats what were doing", which is pretty awful.
It's like what Creature did earlier. I think that being unnecessarily cryptic means that you are trying to hide something.
I mean that I'm not going to get my way and none of my scum reads are going to get lynched, so my choice is to be stubborn and sit on a vanity wagon, or join the lynch. For a long time on site, I just stayed on my vanity wagon and protested what I viewed as foolishness, but that doesn't really help anyone and it's really a bit of a dick move. So erm... what was cryptic about that?