[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8020670 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1720: Arctic Mafia - Game over! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #36 (isolation #4) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 5:51 pm
Postby Dunnstral »
I think goon is 100 posts, let's all goon it up this game
Speaking of posts I'm going to be trying to post less than I usually do as I don't want to run anyone away just with sheer quantity of posts (which happens....) and I feel like this is going to be a slower paced game (for me) anyways
Post
Post #90 (isolation #11) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:06 am
Postby Dunnstral »
VOTE: Aragorn The Ranger
All of your posts seems to be skirting around the discussion adn you're not taking any stances (and seem overly defensive of your rvs vote)
In post 86, boring wrote:
UNVOTE: Apricity since RVS seems to be drawing to a close.
Probably not a good move to make - unvoting doesn't help us and not choosing a new person to vote doesn't help us, also it probably makes you look bad when you unvote like that after rvs in games
In post 36, Dunnstral wrote:I think goon is 100 posts, let's all goon it up this game
Speaking of posts I'm going to be trying to post less than I usually do as I don't want to run anyone away just with sheer quantity of posts (which happens....) and I feel like this is going to be a slower paced game (for me) anyways
In post 86, boring wrote:
UNVOTE: Apricity since RVS seems to be drawing to a close.
Probably not a good move to make - unvoting doesn't help us and not choosing a new person to vote doesn't help us, also it probably makes you look bad when you unvote like that after rvs in games
Instead of being curious about or pushing boring for what could well have been a scummy move, he instead advises her. I think he wasn't suspicious because he already knew she had a town role pm.
VOTE: Dunnstral
I'm not suspicious of Boring because I believed her to be genuine and my reads are good. Notably I did mention lazy wasn't as genuine and could lean either why
Lurk stuff is maybe, but lurking is absolutely not my style regardless (this game is slow and I've been phone posting due to computer issues)
Also your point on me being afraid of experienced players is downright silly, I'm not a newbie and I didn't queue to pick on newbies
Post
Post #184 (isolation #19) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:04 pm
Postby Dunnstral »
In post 182, CCC wrote:And the point you missed, marginal as it may be, does appear to be House's strongest point against you. The fact that you didn't give any response to it, therefore, isn't really a point in your favour.
So, now that I've pointed it out specifically, do you have a defense against this argument to make?
It's wrong though, and that could be verified if you had checked Aragorn's iso for yourself
In post 190, hayatoBL wrote:Your position is clear. But I disagree with it. I understand, those kinds of scum read *might* discourage other new players or Town-boring from asking further question, but I hardly feel that it is my responsibility, because I'm doing here what I'm supposed to be doing, which is scum-hunt and help lynch the best possible candidate. It's not like I intend to discourage them from asking...
A better solution would be for *them* not to feel discourage and again, they shouldn't. Because, if I instead hid my suspicion, then I'll look weird suspecting boring without being able to explain it. This will potentially make me look like scum. Are you still going to encourage this?
You are
really
not helping your case here. A lynch vote that
directly
quotes asking a newbie question as reason to lynch is
going
to be intimidating, whether intentionally or not. And simply saying "they shouldn't feel discouraged" when you do something discouraging is just making me more and more inclined to reinstate my policy lynch.
I do think Dunnstral is more likely to be mafia than you are. But the margin is very slight, and I can very easily see myself reinstating my policy lynch on you if Dunnstral is able to offer a half-decent defense to House's detailed read.
In post 193, hayatoBL wrote:Furthermore CCC, I don't see boring or anyone else effected by this "discouragement" right now, albeit boring did claimed she was intimidated, but not anymore. So your policy lynch stance seems to have overstayed it's welcome and starting to look a bit scummy to me.
Do you honestly still see everyone(minus boring) as the same Null right now?
My current rankings for the players, from most to least scummy:
Dunnstral
House
hayatoBL
Apricity=Skrub=Drixx
boring
You will notice that Aragorn the Ranger is not on the list; that's because he's posted so little that I can't read even a flicker of anything off him (I'm choosing to assume that it means his computer has been trampled by an angry rhinoceros, and waiting to try to get a read on his replacement before I rank him). The distance between Dunnstral and Apracity/Skrub/Drixx is marginal; anyone in that top section could be mafia (though I very much doubt that Dunnstral and House are
both
mafia). The big gap before boring is, however, a major gap; I would be
very
surprised if Boring turned out to be mafia.
OK, why am I the most scummy? And why can't I be mafia with House
All of your posts seems to be skirting around the discussion adn you're not taking any stances (and seem overly defensive of your rvs vote)
Yes, I'll admit my earlier posts weren't related to the game but I don't think you'll see that now.
It seems we have a minor misunderstanding about me being overly defensive about my RVS. I can assure you that it was no such thing. It was just an honest answer. Unfortunately, I haven't had much time to read all posts and the posts I read in the little time I had weren't enough to make a reasonable guess on someone. Having said that, I'll try my best to read the posts so that the game isn't spoiled due to inactivity.
This.
By the way they're set to be replaced, so of course this train of thought doesn't account for much other than me still wanting to vote this slot
Post
Post #251 (isolation #28) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 7:25 am
Postby Dunnstral »
In post 236, hayatoBL wrote:As for Dunstrall, I would like the case resolve. Please defend yourself. Although I will admit, I don't feel like moving your way no matter how weak your defense would be. But who knows? But 'not explaining at all' will *definitely* get you a vote from me. Do explain.
Post
Post #262 (isolation #32) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:33 pm
Postby Dunnstral »
I just think they're town that got tunneled on.
But aside from that, take note that with intent to hammer, CCC is still pushing on me. I am not voting for him.
This is not how I would expect town to react, quite frankly I'd expect them to go after their attackers, but CCC is going after me in the belief that I am mafia
Post
Post #268 (isolation #34) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:54 pm
Postby Dunnstral »
In post 263, House wrote:Now, it just looks like you're not voting for him order to garner towncred.
Untrue. I do not intend for CCC to get lynched, and explained why they're town. I didn't negate anything. How long should I wait to reveal this information...? There's intent to hammer on him, and they've claimed
Post
Post #274 (isolation #37) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:01 pm
Postby Dunnstral »
In post 270, House wrote:So why the passive-aggressive remark about not joining the newbie queue to pick on newbies?
I don't really remember, and it doesn't really matter? Perhaps you should have asked when it happened, and not 3 days/100 posts later when it doesn't matter
Post
Post #292 (isolation #44) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:32 pm
Postby Dunnstral »
Because I don't believe that Drixx ever intended to hammer, and was instead reaction testing
Plus, I presented my case on why I think CCC is town and there has been discussion. If Drixx comes in anyway and just hammers anyway; then we've got a problem
Post
Post #326 (isolation #47) » Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:29 am
Postby Dunnstral »
The reason to move your vote is the way he reacted in that same post where he claimed - he wouldn't have been focused on me in parts like that if he were mafia
Post
Post #327 (isolation #48) » Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:30 am
Postby Dunnstral »
In post 325, Skrub wrote:Now you're twisting my words. I didn't say anything about fabrication or pretending. I said a member of the town would try to find scum up until they died. You're clearly not doing that.