Mini 1812 | Quolls | Endgame
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
You are okay with him voting me. However, your vote remains on him instead of me?In post 108, A Simple Plan wrote:I'm actually okay with this after a Vedith ISO.
That was a clear throw away comment to make yourself look more involved.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I don't care whyIn post 144, Shadow_step wrote:Why hasn't he asked why I'm voting him ?
You are a waste of spaceIn post 144, Shadow_step wrote:In fact he hasn't even addressed me directly ..
I think ASP is scum. Can you only have 1 scum a time?In post 144, Shadow_step wrote:If he thinks I'm scum he would be voting me, which he isn't.
Bless... No one thinks you're town. *Pats you on your head*In post 144, Shadow_step wrote:So he think I'm town or he simply thinks its NAI, but from his PoV the latter doesn't seem plausible.
Callingsomeoneawasteofspaceisovertheline.Attacktheplay,nottheplayer.--PLast edited by Plotinus on Sun Jul 10, 2016 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Anything catch your attention?In post 173, The_Jester wrote:Welp, I was just going through the threadI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Any reason you find this wagon better than ASP's?In post 183, Killthestory wrote:Quality wagon has been madeI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I'm not disputing that. However, you said quality wagon has been made. Does this mean you don't see ASP's entrance as scummy? Do you see him as town?In post 188, Killthestory wrote:
Because Jester actually looks scummyIn post 184, Vedith wrote:
Any reason you find this wagon better than ASP's?In post 183, Killthestory wrote:Quality wagon has been made
Also, what stands out the most with the Jester?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Your play is a waste of space.In post 197, Shadow_step wrote:Don't get your knickers in a twist scumboy.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Because he's voting Shadow Step, then likes where Shadow step is voting.In post 199, Killthestory wrote:how is ASP's entrance bad? It looks fine to me
How does that look fine?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
@Shadow - I'm not looking to ruin day 1 for town so I apologise for talking down to you. You can carry on with your read on me and if needed then question me. Apart from that I'm going to focus where I want and drop this before it gets silly.
Jester is trying to distract imo as much as KTS for me. Jester trying to look too scummy to be scum and KTS I just don't know what to say there. I have entered played kuchen with KTS but what I have seen this just seems extremely over exaggerated (his opening and now following murdercat)I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Who is this aimed at?In post 216, Killthestory wrote:So essentially what you're saying is that anyone who disagrees with you is scum or stupid?
Neat.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I don't really know to be honest.In post 219, Killthestory wrote:Who do you think?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 351, MURDERCAT wrote:Well that looks more like the nacho I know. Something still feels a bit off though, I still don't know what he thinks of any other players. Nacho, we hypo day 2+?In post 354, MURDERCAT wrote:I think the nacho votes look ok now.
I don't understand this, can you explain it to me?
You start leaning to Nacho being more like himself (which I can only assume town him in your eyes) then you think the votes on him look okay?
If this is the case, what changed in the 2 posts between these?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
My vote was before Robb had any votes and my second comment was in regards to the "L1" post from Jester considering it was L5. This was page 1 with 2 people putting a vote on Robb. You really are scratching the walls here.In post 381, Shadow_step wrote:
Why didn't you have a problem with this vote? Granted it wasn't a naked vote, but there is no real reasoning. Specifically why didn't you have a problem with not voting someone who had already posted? He could have also voted to form a wagon but did not, why didn't you have a problem with that?In post 320, All In wrote:Notes from pages 1-3
-Don't like Shadow Steps RVS vote: Naked vote on a person who has not yet posted.
-Shadow Step follows up with a vote on my predecessor when the RVS wagon starts to build. Wondering why he didn't try starting a wagon instead of his naked vote earlier
-Murdercat taking the lead and votes Raskolnikov: good vote.
I need to go right now. I'll finish up on my catchup a bit later.
Plus when the wagon on Robb(now All in) started to formIn post 18, Vedith wrote:Content to hammer!Vedith said this and didn't jump on that Robb wagon.
There is something really weird going on between these two slots.
I'd prefer a All in lynch now cause that attack on me feels like a chainsaw.
VOTE: All inI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Because what you are saying about me is completely weak.In post 389, Shadow_step wrote:Dude, why would you even address something which isn't asked to you in the first place.
You didn't even allow All In to answer it first.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
May I ask why you specifically took those 2 games to compare to?In post 418, A Simple Plan wrote:Reading over things, I've come to the decision that i might be wrong about Vedith in terms of him being scum. Rereading his ISO for Open 606 and Micro 547 (I'll link to them later, I'm late for a dinner date ATM) the only major difference I can see in his playstyle is activity, which is decisively in my book not alignment indicative. He was town both of the aforementioned games. For now...
UNVOTE:
They were pretty far down the list of my games. Do you believe that people can't adept to their own meta after that amount of time?
How do you feel I would play if I was scum?
To me, this was a failed wagon so you are now jumping straight off it.
Can you give me thoughts on other players?
What do you think about Jester? Is his play too obvious?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Shadow I think is actually looking for scum. I don't think he is going into the right directions though.In post 444, Raskolnikov wrote:@Vedith any comment on the nacho thing or on the other slots? What is your actual read on shadow?
Nacho I don't see as scum, I've only played a few games with him though so meta side I can't comment but it doesn't seem off, but I don't really see why others are voting him.
Out of the 3 leading wagons, KTS would be the best (Dragon lynch seems forced).
ASP on the other hand... Tries to make a wagon on me, fails and he gives up.
That's a scum tell in my book.
Jester I'm worried about, he's making it obvious that he wants to put no effort into the game. Personally I see this as a double bluff a roo McGee.
KTS is more fluff in game, a bit like Jester but looks a lot more fake and trying to hide it more.
Murdercat I'm not warming up to yet, didn't like the Nacho comment personal.
UNVOTE: ASP
This doesn't change my read on ASP
VOTE: KTSI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Do you think it's a good wagon?In post 484, MURDERCAT wrote:God damn, I'm vla and I'm the one being sheeped...
I would assume so considering your vote is still there.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Yet your vote remains on KTS?In post 488, MURDERCAT wrote:don't feel so great about itwhen a bunch of people just hop on without a lot of thought...I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In what way?In post 498, Bellaphant wrote:Also veid's post there looks stirry
Don't you think it's a bit odd that he puts his vote on KTS when Nacho/Dragon look stronger as wagons, then when people start voting with him, he says that he likes it even less, but keeps his vote there.
In post 454, MURDERCAT wrote:VOTE: KTS
Sheepy and I think his read on me is fake. This is a real wagon that I want to happen.
This looks like a pre town credit vote imo.In post 484, MURDERCAT wrote:God damn, I'm vla and I'm the one being sheeped...I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Or just a case of trying to make Nacho look scummy since he was voting Nacho.In post 586, MURDERCAT wrote:Well that was honestly pretty suprising considering how shit day 1 felt. I'll need to reread. Someone figure out why hip died? I don't think he was that strongly town read, did he hint PR? Or was he pushing someone weird?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Useful vote.
However, talk to me about the wagon. I think the wagon was ridicules to not have a counter. You were obviously first on the wagon, so did you actually want the lynch on ASP at that point (no so quickly, but in mindset)? Do you think he had scum on his wagon?
The reason I'm asking you this is because you ahve shown concern to the lynch but haven't continued with it.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Why do you think that scum didn't think of it as a tracker / PR?
I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So by this, you think that Bella is scummy, right?In post 554, The_Jester wrote:This response to ASP's case is even more scummy imo
Did you not fancy a vote here for the scummy comment? What's your current view on Bella?
Side note - This is the first game I've been in with Jester that I don't recall his actual involvement.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Do you think you should be thought of as helpful town for voting there?In post 645, The_Jester wrote:Speaking of involvement, I've lynched scum and Murder- who accuses me of "doing nothing"- has only managed to mislynch an inactive townie whilst encouraging a quickhammer with no danger of hitting the deadline. Hypocrisy at its best.
And yes, I'd like to lynch Bella but she doesn't seem to be present atm and I don't wanna see another quicklynch.
Considering this was your vote. You would have voted any where, right? Keep in mind at this stage Nacho and Dragon were both on L4 (no real risk).In post 420, The_Jester wrote:Yup still confused.
VOTE: DoTW
I'm a sheep.
Plus the only thing he posted is excuses for inactivity, misreading and fluff (just like me, huh?)
Do you think that Bella should get credit for lynching scum on day 1? Why do you think that she could be quick lynched and KTS won't be? I mean, Bella isn't V/LA or anything, right?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
That's fair... So you haven't obviously been useless, but I don't really see an effort from your side.In post 649, The_Jester wrote:You tell me. What I think is I shouldn't be called useless.
You could have, at what stage could you have though? When the lynch looked more secure? Wouldn't that have put pressure on you if you did?In post 649, The_Jester wrote:I could've also unvoted later on which I didn't cause I was confident in that wagon.
Or did you fuck up trying to distance expecting the lynch to never go ahead?
So if he has 1 vote and you don't think it, why will 1 vote on Bella be an issue?In post 649, The_Jester wrote:He has 1 vote as of yet so no I don't think he'll get quicklynched. And Bella hasn't posted in almost 4 full days.
Seriously, go away.
586 What was your issue with this comment?
Why do you want me to go away? Do you feel I should be pushing on this kind of stuff?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
What do you think of the ASP wagon - And the fast lynch?In post 658, Bellaphant wrote:Hey veid, murder: I'm super struggling right now, can you chuck some questions at me to get my head back in this?
What do you think about Jester avoiding answering questions / thinking you are scummy?
Do you still think that HipLop was killed to frame Nacho (or highly possible)?
Do you think that scum were on A) Dragon wagon - B) ASP wagon.
Who is your top scum read right now?
What's your view on 652?
That should help get into the game.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
This wagon?In post 627, Plotinus wrote:A Simple Plan (L-0): Shadow_Step, Raskolnikov, Nachomamma8, MURDERCAT, dwlee99, Killthestory <-- LYNCH
Why did you not think it had scum on when you originally voted?
Why not Murder or KTS instead of Nacho or Shadow?
This was your vote (Putting him to L1).
I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
If you hammer with 12 days left and so little content KTS I'll take that as a scum claim and tunnel the fuck out of you.
Shadow - what changed? Do you actually care where you vote?
Why do you want someone at L1 so easily without reason provided. While you're at it, provide it.
I see little effort from most right now, considering its day 3...
So as discussed yesterday, are we doing Nachos idea?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So it's a policy lynch?In post 686, MURDERCAT wrote:We have a good wagon vedith, jester can either produce content or eat rope.
If people scum read him...
However, why rush?
If this is a PL wagon - DreadfulI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Okay, explain why you're town or why someone else (also who) should be lynched.
I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So what am I at? L1 or L2?
Either way I might as well claim as lynching me is not a good idea.
I'm an x shot Cop.
I can confirm that I checked Nacho and he is town. This is my reason for not thinking he is scum day 2 and today.
I will not confirm if all in was checked unless I am hammered.
The fact that Dwlee started to push on me after I was questioning for his sudden swap of reads is what concerns me. He thinks that Nacho or Shadow are scum but makes no effort into pushing at them or discussing them.
The fact that he is saying Nacho while Nacho is inactive and him saying Shadow when Shadow seems to be an easy push in every game should be looked into.
VOTE: DwleeI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I have already confirmed that I checked Nacho. You are looking for me to confirm if I did a second check. Do you see a lot of x Cop shots more than 2/3?
This is so scummy trying to find out if my shots are used or not.
I also have not confirmed that I checked all in Last night... I have said twice I will confirm if lynched so what are you lying?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Yeah, keep trying to get information...In post 724, Dwlee99 wrote:If you are a 2 or 3 shot cop and didnt check one of the nights your play is trash lolI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
What pressure are we going to get with him putting to L1?In post 759, MURDERCAT wrote:Ummm ok this was mostly a pressure wagon but alright I agree with you the vote was scummy.
I doubt he would even claim given that he is refusing to give reads on anyone or even help in the game.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Okay, so today we decide who to lynch from you, KTS and Murder?In post 777, Shadow_step wrote:So for me it's between KTS and MC.
If Bella is conf scum we can lynch her later.
I think we should be lynching between these 2.
I'm going to look through later and see anything in connection with Bella / Dragon and anyone else.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
@Nacho, All in - What's your view on KTS, Murder and Shadow if we were to lynch 1 today?
We basically have a 1/3 chance of hitting scum there without the reads. If you believe me, we have 1 shot before LyLo (giving night results).
109 and 123 are Dragon to KTS at the start. Seems odd for me. Like a bit of friendly fluff.
243 - Dragon trying to defuse the situation between me and Shadow.
248 - Calling shadow out, possible distancing but I don't see it strong enough for that.
253 - More fluff / joking
370 - I don't know what this means?
462 - About Shadow tunneling.
Bella
428 - Advising out of PT? Not too sure, seems a little weak for me to say that.
658 - Asking me and Murder, this is a reason why I think Murder is town out of the 3, she would have already spoken to her scum buddy.
That's all I have from their posts concerning the 3.
Shadow calls basically everyone scum or argues with most people apart from Dragon or Bella. Given that they have little to no content, but nothing?!
He calls me scum, he calls Murder scum, he even says that All In is confirmed scum. He then thinks both Nacho and KTS, and then to ASP... It goes on and he doesn't once mention Dragon or Bella until 632 - He's pushing on me and 740 - he's distancing himself from Bella without committing.
777 - He says that we can lynch Bella later.
KTS / Murder I'll look at tomorrow as I'm ill and tired. (Boo hoo, poor me!)I claim scum \o/ - Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith