Mini 1812 | Quolls | Endgame

[Plotinus]

Official Vote Count 1.12 Tiger Quoll

---

Lynching

With 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to lynch.

A Simple Plan

(L-3): Vedith, hiplop, Raskolnikov, dwlee99

The_Jester

(L-5): Robbnva, Killthestory

Vedith

(L-5): Shadow_Step, The_Jester

Nachomamma8

(L-5): MURDERCAT, Dragon of the West

Shadow_Step

(L-6): A Simple Plan

Dragon of the West

(L-6): Bellaphant

Not Voting

(1): Nachomamma8

M

o

d

n

o

t

e

s

:

K

e

e

p

i

t

f

u

n

!

d

w

l

e

e

9

9

i

s

V

/

L

A

u

n

t

i

l

S

u

n

d

a

y

.

M

U

R

D

E

R

C

A

T

i

s

V

/

L

A

u

n

t

i

l

t

h

e

2

2

n

d

.

D

e

a

d

l

i

n

e

:

(expired on 2016-07-22 14:00:00)

.

[MURDERCAT]

I'm confused why he is using it as an excuse to not post content as well

Exactly what I was thinking...

[Raskolnikov]

Okay, bringing it up now just to get people to agree to do it later (get a consensus/commitment now) makes sense because it avoids problems implementing it down the line, and proposing it later people might not agree so readily or be caught up in things. The problem is if we spend too much time on this it's essentially noise and interrupting the game, so ideally sort this out ASAP and move on. And right now that means going into more detail since many of us including myself are either vague or clueless on exactly how this goes.

In general if this works like how I think it does, its good for low-info roles and true-innos with the downside that scum can POE quickly everytime someone hypos a result on them, unless I misunderstand this. People have to convincingly fake results or scum could ignore the obvious fakes as well. In a way this benefits the most if everyone's reads are bad (and their hypos are on town) than if people are reading scum correctly and hypo them, so it's kind of like insurance for bad reads which goes well with what PRs do in the first place, overall I think it's more pro-town? Nacho bringing it up is a little unsettling tbh because scum nacho is probably best suited to abuse the data from this for pr hunting. Another concern is if people play off the results too heavily if scum have gf/ninja/rb/scumdoc/traitor/??.

I want more information on this and it's troublesome considering this thing without having anything else from nacho to look at. Also I'm wondering if this should be voted on, initial thought is that's just giving scum the control of the decision but like a regular wagon they may not want to group and peoples choices here is also information to analyse. What a headache though.

[Robbnva]

Gonna take a break for a while. Be back in a day or 2

[Raskolnikov]

After some searching
http://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/con ... y-Yates%29
http://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/con ... by-soah%29

[Raskolnikov]

Reading over I think it's a good idea now even if nacho's scum here and is planning to abuse.

I want to go back to the game now but my scumreads don't post and there's nothing to do..

[Dragon of the West]

While I see the benefit to it, it really sounds like a mess and seems like it could go horribly. If hypo claims are made that are obviously faked, mafia will be able to PoE who is actually a PR role and who is not. Personally, I don't trust myself to fake hypo claims and be able to play through the game acting in a way that is consistent to what I've claimed (which is what you have to do to make sure scum don't know you're faking). This is only my third game D:

[Dwlee99]

While I see the benefit to it, it really sounds like a mess and seems like it could go horribly. If hypo claims are made that are obviously faked, mafia will be able to PoE who is actually a PR role and who is not. Personally, I don't trust myself to fake hypo claims and be able to play through the game acting in a way that is consistent to what I've claimed (which is what you have to do to make sure scum don't know you're faking). This is only my third game D:

I am targeting you

[Dragon of the West]

I am targeting Dragon of the West

Remember that I am targeting dragon of the west

REMEMBER I AM TARGETING DRAGON

Dragon I'm targeting you tonight

While I see the benefit to it, it really sounds like a mess and seems like it could go horribly. If hypo claims are made that are obviously faked, mafia will be able to PoE who is actually a PR role and who is not. Personally, I don't trust myself to fake hypo claims and be able to play through the game acting in a way that is consistent to what I've claimed (which is what you have to do to make sure scum don't know you're faking). This is only my third game D:

I am targeting you

K.

[hiplop]

VOTE: nacho

is that really your first post of content

[The_Jester]

@Dwlee comicality of a joke is inversely proportional to the number of repetitions.

I want to hypo results this game.

Could you link me a game where that actually worked?

I want to hypo results this game. Thinking out loud, wanted to do this all at once but it seems the longer I put it off until I have a significant chunk of time the longer I put off the game in general.

Also why did you hold off on posting for this? I don't see why this is a priority now and I don't know why planning to hypo results would delay you from getting in the game.

This so much.

[Vedith]

@MOD - V/LA until further notice

N

o

t

e

d

.

-

-

P

[The_Jester]

Welp.
VOTE: Nacho

[Robbnva]

Sorry guys

request replacement

[The_Jester]

See ya in another

life

game

[Plotinus]

I

f

i

n

d

i

n

g

n

e

w

R

o

b

b

n

v

a

.

[Plotinus]

A

l

l

I

n

i

s

n

e

w

R

o

b

b

n

v

a

.

Y

a

y

!

P

l

e

a

s

e

w

e

l

c

o

m

e

!

[The_Jester]

That was fast. Hi Va Banque!

[All In]

Hey y'all!

I'll catch up asap!

[All In]

UNVOTE:

[All In]

Notes from pages 1-3

-Don't like Shadow Steps RVS vote: Naked vote on a person who has not yet posted.
-Shadow Step follows up with a vote on my predecessor when the RVS wagon starts to build. Wondering why he didn't try starting a wagon instead of his naked vote earlier
-Murdercat taking the lead and votes Raskolnikov: good vote.

I need to go right now. I'll finish up on my catchup a bit later.

[The_Jester]

-Don't like Shadow Steps RVS vote: Naked vote on a person who has not yet posted.

Are you serious right now? RVS votes are often naked plus only 4 people posted before him, all fluff.
What about hiplop's or dwlee's RVS votes? Also naked.

-Shadow Step follows up with a vote on my predecessor when the RVS wagon starts to build. Wondering why he didn't try starting a wagon instead of his naked vote earlier

Am I stupid or does this not make any sense? How the fuck do you intentionally start a valid wagon 10 posts into the game?

VOTE: All in

[A Simple Plan]

Hey guys, I apologiE for having to do this sort of thing, but I've had zero time the last couple days. I'm gonna try to catch up tonight, and if that fails I'll request replacement. A bunch of stuff has hit me at once; again, I'm sorry.

[All In]

-Don't like Shadow Steps RVS vote: Naked vote on a person who has not yet posted.

Are you serious right now? RVS votes are often naked plus only 4 people posted before him, all fluff.
What about hiplop's or dwlee's RVS votes? Also naked.

-Shadow Step follows up with a vote on my predecessor when the RVS wagon starts to build. Wondering why he didn't try starting a wagon instead of his naked vote earlier

Am I stupid or does this not make any sense? How the fuck do you intentionally start a valid wagon 10 posts into the game?

VOTE: All in

My point was that he could have attempted to interact or vote either of the people already in the game. He specifically chose someone not already in the game to vote, without a single comment.

My second point was not that he had to make a valid wagon. I'm saying that he didn't attempt to start a wagon with his first vote, but when a wagon was built, he suddenly was interested. Still without making a single comment.

I'm only posting my thoughts and I only got to page 3 at that point. Are you lacking reads so badly that you had to vote me for this??

[Bellaphant]

I've only seen that kind of claiming work where everyone has pr? Ughhh.