*sighs*In post 644, House wrote:That explains a lot of my raised eyebrows.In post 613, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:with the difficulty I'm having in real life I don't think I'm going to be able to keep up with all of them.
I wish you the best.
VOTE: Peptobislawl
Not quite ready to go to Gamma yet, he's very lynchbaity.
hey, let's ignore him and run this pepto wagon into the groundIn post 615, Ankamius wrote:OrIn post 608, Blade Dancer wrote:VOTE: Ank
Really? Terrible how? For catching McMenno using a routine bullshit line scum use or McMenno is just your buddy.
You cannot justify McMenno being town and you realized that the moment it came from your lips, so you can to resort to attacking me.
I misremembered where the read came from, glanced at the notes I took and saw I had no specific post attributed to the read, and skimmed his ISO to refigure out why I was townreading him in the first place.
And your engagement on him was terrible because you were making up bullshit about his responses to you.
are you chainsawing your buddy pepto now? tsk tskIn post 616, Blade Dancer wrote:Meh, I don't want zakk dead. He's more of my townreads want it so whatever. I would rather lynch McMenno then Giga slot, or Ank. Ank subject to move depending on answer.In post 612, Accountant wrote:For someone who supposedly wants to see zakk dead you don't seem to hate him very much BD.
... no vote.In post 636, zakk wrote:also, now that i'm reading into you, what the FUCK is up with all your 1. excuses, 2. promises to do more later, and 3. pointing out who else hasn't done enough?
In post 510, Andrius wrote:I will have to reread zakkbefore considering voting that way.
I have a sneaking suspicion about this game.In post 511, Andrius wrote:Need to see more from Shiro.Miller claim this early is insufficient for a solid read.massive hasn't posted yet either.SnarkySnowman made an angry post that made me laugh, but hasn't posted reads/content yet (IIRC).In post 512, Andrius wrote:I know what I can expect from you, soI will be patient, but I would like some reads before I consider throwing swords.In post 521, Andrius wrote:zakk and chara are in their own reads category.
He requires further reading.Don't like how two of my scumreads are on the wagon but w/e.In post 617, Andrius wrote:I will read him in greater detail laterbut the past few pages do nothing to help him.In post 617, Andrius wrote:Csnt parse this one out yetand the longer it goes on the more difficult he will make it. Just take a step back and stop continuously posting.We're still missing a good number of players.
you're not the owner of a bakery
you're the owner of an excuse factory
idontgetitIn post 653, McMenno wrote:are you chainsawing your buddy pepto now? tsk tsk
Bad vote is bad.
who's he heavily pushing me and AnkIn post 655, House wrote:idontgetitIn post 653, McMenno wrote:are you chainsawing your buddy pepto now? tsk tsk
I immediately stated that wasn't the case and that the reasoning is entirely different. Why exactly are you pushing for me to expand on what I already stated was false? I don't even understand what the last sentence even means since I redacted that statement before you made a single post on it.In post 649, Blade Dancer wrote:What's so difficult about me asking you to justify you saying "his posting" is town?In post 648, Ankamius wrote:What's so difficult to understand that the townread is based on how people have interacted with him over his posting itself?
You then walked that back immediately.
Second, my accuracy makes it more likely he is scum, not less. Merely, saying I am bad without substance doesn't justify a townread there. It's a classic deflection. Don't focus on my terrible unjustified townread on McMenno because Blade Dancer pushed it.
How can you write off a possible wagon as a waste of time this early into d1?In post 659, Ankamius wrote:Accountant's attack is significantly worse, though. I'd be voting that slot now if it wasn't a waste of time.
AS LONG AS YOU POINT IT OUT IN ALL CAPS, IT REMOVED THE OPPORTUNISTICALITYISM.
No I just don't like the way the game is heading and I'd rather Pepto over any of these other votes.In post 663, House wrote:AS LONG AS YOU POINT IT OUT IN ALL CAPS, IT REMOVED THE OPPORTUNISTICALITYISM.
In post 596, Accountant wrote:This reads list is bad and you should feel bad.In post 571, Ankamius wrote:Okay, I'm caught up.
Town:
Andrius
House
Leonshade
Maxous
McMenno
SirCakez
SlySly
zakk
Null:
Creature
Gamma Emerald
Nosferatu
Scum:
Accountant
Blade Dancer
Gigabytetroubadour
Not Chara
Peptobislawl
Everyone not listed anywhere hasn't done anything I particularly care about.
Maxous might not have a high post count, but he certainly hasn't been inactive.
He's (figuratively) begging to be lynched and people are rushing to fulfill his request. That's not the sort of wagon which has scum on the other end.In post 671, Leonshade wrote:Explain your TR on Gamma.
because when i glanced over your ISO i seen you did little else apart from push zakk.In post 670, Accountant wrote:I'm not comfortable with the 3 unexplained scumreads on me. Feels like the counter wagon zakk was talking about.
Fair enough.In post 673, Maxous wrote:because when i glanced over your ISO i seen you did little else apart from push zakk.In post 670, Accountant wrote:I'm not comfortable with the 3 unexplained scumreads on me. Feels like the counter wagon zakk was talking about.
which is why i asked for the readlist
