You're full of crap.In post 973, Accountant wrote:@Maxous: That looks like playstyle, not alignment.
Nahdia isn't as stupid as she's playing right now.
You're full of crap.In post 973, Accountant wrote:@Maxous: That looks like playstyle, not alignment.
No, because she's doing so when I'm never scumread d1 as town by anyone with any sense and she had plenty of sense.In post 976, Accountant wrote:Why? Because she's calling you scum?
Enough to know she's one of the better players on the site.In post 978, Accountant wrote:Before we proceed, how many games have you played with Nahdia?
Idk about white knighted, but she buddied the fuck out of you.In post 980, Gamma Emerald wrote:@House, I feel Nahdia may have whiteknighted me a little, do you agree?
What do you think of Nahdia's entrance?
Given that the leading wagon has been on Pepto for a significant amount of time your “X and Y are Counterwagons to Z” argument that excludes Pepto is pretty spurious.In post 846, Blade Dancer wrote:You. Gamma is a counter to you and zakk.
Frankly, I tend to buy the obliviousness though.
You probably now understand that the reason I told you to stop posting is that Creature was running a stupid gambit with Nahdia. While I didn’t think anything would come from it you were basically making sure it was blown up.In post 794, Gamma Emerald wrote:Give me your read on me if you want that to even be a possibility.
Happened a long time ago – are you not reading?In post 862, Gamma Emerald wrote:If you or someone else presents the case again, I might see it differently. Happened with zakk!
So if you think he’s scum why is your vote not on the leading wagon?In post 870, SirCakez wrote:Pepto got wagoned in Mafiaception, he wordlessly flaked out, he was scum
Same thing happened here
It's the extent of reading that's causing the problem.
Scanning an ISO isn't nearly as strenuous as you're making it out to be.
If you hate reading so much, why wouldn't you ISO someone actually voting him that has a fraction of my posts?In post 994, Gamma Emerald wrote:A quick look back through House's ISO shows that the start of the case was based on an associative tell.
The only other thing I've seen that was scummy was the replace out.
Am I missing something?
That's a misrep. I said that on page 20-something, and never said anything about not reading pages going forward (as should be obvious since I caught this). If you guys generate thirty pages in the opening two days of a thread, ninety percent of that is going to be useless. It's much better for me to start forming my opinions at page 20-something, where you guys are all actually contributing content.In post 919, SlySly wrote:massive has already said he's not willing to commit to reading 37 pages of a large game he signed up for and is willing to sheep MOI. That's not more worthy of a look than millers? Come on!
He's taking Sly's lynch as a given, even thoughIn post 195, Peptobislawl wrote:Make that 3 of us, you took the "joke" to far. probably would have suspected you if not for sly, still might if he flips town.In post 189, Not Chara wrote: gigabyte: i also didn't get that your call for a PL was a joke.
What the fuck kind of reasoning is this for a vote?