Mini 1864 - Mao Mafia [GAME OVER]

[Suzune]

Votecount 1.10

Gamma Emerald (6)

- Clumsy Phoenix, BTD6_Maker, karnos, Chairman, Radical Rat, ironstove

Mas y Menos (4)

- Tiershift, Chairman, Chairman, Chairman

Radical Rat (2)

- Suzune, SnarkySnowman

SnarkySnowman (1)

- 12345678

123456789 (1)

- Chairman

SlySly (1)

- shos

karnos (1)

- SlySly

Not Voting (2)

- Gamma Emerald, FaerieLord, Mas y Menos

Mod Notes

I have decided to stop aggressively editing in rule violations so I'll stick to just applying the penalties here, and only revealing when rules have been broken for the first or second time.

________________________________________


Oh, we are finally back up!

[Suzune]

What is Harlequin? Is it just another name for Jester or is it a different 3P?

I thought a harlequin was a mafia role. They have different powers though depending on who the host is.

[ironstove]

Am I the only person who the site was down for for the past 2 days WTF?

[shos]

The entire site. And it still seems on and off.

[FaerieLord]

Yeah, mith posted about it on the FB group. It was a hosting issue, I think. Still a bit shaky for me

[Gamma Emerald]

Replace me out, IRL issues

[123456789]

@Radical -- No need for you to know atm.

[BTD6_maker]

I can post here again. Mith should really consider changing servers.

[BTD6_maker]

Alright, what was the penalty that he enforced for that rule #1 or is that also not revealed?

This violates rule #1

On a completely unrelated note to the above quote, I ISO'd a strange player named Chairman and I think I saw an unvote for Ironstove. I don't know why Chairman made that play, it's probably against her wincon.

[SnarkySnowman]

Just got back from site downtime. Deadline is not affected. Prod counter reset as of right now. I'll get caught up sometime in the next 24 hours.

[karnos]

Moved over the weekend plus site downage. Reading the last few pages as soon as I get some time.

[Radical Rat]

What is Harlequin? Is it just another name for Jester or is it a different 3P?

I thought a harlequin was a mafia role. They have different powers though depending on who the host is.

This was not my intention. I just needed a synonym.

[SlySly]

Ok, it seems like centuries since I've thought of this game.

So far, BTD6 seem the shadiest, so...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: BTD6

[Suzune]

Sorry my computer decided to remind me it was a demon. It has crashed, will be playing from my phone for a while.

[BTD6_maker]

Can you please give an actual case on me instead of a naked vote?

[TierShift]

I'm in an exam period right now but I'll try to catch up tomorrow.

[123456789]

Ok, it seems like centuries since I've thought of this game.

So far, BTD6 seem the shadiest, so...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: BTD6

Weak; oes he seem shadier than usual?

You are obviously not considering all angles and viewpoints; your vote shows your ignorance.

[SlySly]

Weak; oes he seem shadier than usual?

You are obviously not considering all angles and viewpoints; your vote shows your ignorance.

I've never played with him before. He seems to have knowledge I don't possess. Maybe shady was the wrong word. Maybe "informed" would have been better. I don't have a way to view chairman activity.

I'm not really worried about my ignorance at this point. This game is crawling along. I don't know if I'm voting to elect someone or to lynch someone. Like my other vote, it's not that big of a deal. If he gets to L-1, he will have a chance to claim and if my vote needs to come off, I will move it. I don't think he's in any danger of a quick lynch at this point, but your concern is noted.

[SnarkySnowman]

Rules have properly been enforced and votecounts updated. Rule #16 has been added.

[Clumsy Phoenix]

NI! IT!

[SnarkySnowman]

[BTD6_maker]

Weak; oes he seem shadier than usual?

You are obviously not considering all angles and viewpoints; your vote shows your ignorance.

I've never played with him before. He seems to have knowledge I don't possess. Maybe shady was the wrong word. Maybe "informed" would have been better. I don't have a way to view chairman activity.

I'm not really worried about my ignorance at this point. This game is crawling along. I don't know if I'm voting to elect someone or to lynch someone. Like my other vote, it's not that big of a deal. If he gets to L-1, he will have a chance to claim and if my vote needs to come off, I will move it. I don't think he's in any danger of a quick lynch at this point, but your concern is noted.

I don't have a way to view chairman activity either.

This violates Rule #16

[Mas y Menos]

okay so

rule 2 is that you must use voting tags to vote

over

~Menos

This violates Rule #1

[BTD6_maker]

Weak; oes he seem shadier than usual?

You are obviously not considering all angles and viewpoints; your vote shows your ignorance.

I've never played with him before. He seems to have knowledge I don't possess. Maybe shady was the wrong word. Maybe "informed" would have been better. I don't have a way to view chairman activity.

I'm not really worried about my ignorance at this point. This game is crawling along. I don't know if I'm voting to elect someone or to lynch someone. Like my other vote, it's not that big of a deal. If he gets to L-1, he will have a chance to claim and if my vote needs to come off, I will move it. I don't think he's in any danger of a quick lynch at this point, but your concern is noted.

I don't have a way to view chairman activity either.

If I told you why I can know chairman activity, she will probably just OMGUS me.

This violates rule #16

[SlySly]

fine

UNVOTE:

someone give me something good to sheep.