Micro 658 - Frozen [Game over]

Dunnstral · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 7:58 am

Think he means two separate nights

Dunnstral · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:01 am

ok let's lynch somebody scummy then

VOTE: SirCakez

Postie · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:05 am

Cool. Why's he scummy?

Dunnstral · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:06 am

I'd like to think "scummy" is his natural state of existence and occasionally as town he'll try and show it

Postie · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:12 am

So... he's just null then? Okay. Come pressure lane with me.

lane0168 · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:13 am

Naked votes isn't pressure friend

Postie · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:14 am

Alright: I think you're scummy. Fite me.

lane0168 · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:18 am

I guess I was interpreting, no pt, no cooperation. If they shoot town, town dies, but they both have to shoot Elsa for her to die. Maybe not. Considering we only have to get one. And each day hopefully 1 more town knows who Elsa is. I'm not smart enough with that to know how op it would be but doesn't seem too much if that's in fact how it is

Postie · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:20 am

That's some nice set-up spec who's scum

Dunnstral · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:25 am

Aristophanes · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:32 am

In post 183, Postie wrote:That's some nice set-up spec who's scum

In post 184, Dunnstral wrote:I'm

VOTE: Dunn
Thanks for claiming!

Dunnstral · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:38 am

Aristophanes · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:41 am

In post 186, Dunnstral wrote:town

Too late

Postie · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:42 am

Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me

In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?

Aristophanes · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:28 am

In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?

Anyone but Postie, Parama, Ari, Dunn.

I have no real preference beyond that.

lane0168 · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:38 am

In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?

There isn't anyone who is better than I am at that point, and if you think you are yours delusional. Everyone has done almost nothing alignment indicative, and everyone has done almost no scum hunting. So stop

Postie · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:42 am

lol

Can we lynch lane now

Postie · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:46 am

In post 190, lane0168 wrote:Everyone has done almost nothing alignment indicative

Also this isn't true at all

Parama · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:09 am

In post 162, lane0168 wrote:I like scum-hunting and Elsa claiming to town myself. With no reveals which greatly diminishes chance of accidentally revealing Elsa. I wouldn't trust myself to find scum before the town could find scum before scum could find me. So if else is anything like me, we should really consider not doing that plan.

THIS IS NOT AN ARGUMENT AGAINST EITHER PART OF THE PLAN. SIMPLY SAYING YOUR PREFERENCE WITHOUT BACKING IT UP IN ANY SIGNIFICANT WAY IS A WASTE OF MY TIME.

ANYWAYS WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT NOT SCUMHUNTING

Parama · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:14 am

In post 165, A Simple Plan wrote:
In post 14, Parama wrote:I WOULD SUGGEST EVERYONE PLAY THIS GAME LIKE THEY WERE SCUM. I DON'T WANT TO SEE ANY CASES AND PEOPLE SHOULD KEEP THEIR READS CLOSE TO THEIR CHEST.
Trying to hide reads in any case, and especially saying everyone should, reads sus AF to me. This game can be solved simply from reads.

YOU AND MAGNA ARE BOTH MISSING THE BIG PICTURE.

IF WE DECIDE ELSA SHOULD OUT TO HER TOWN READS, AND EVERYONE HAS THEIR TOWN READS OUT IN THE OPEN, THEN SCUM CAN USE THAT INFORMATION TO FIGURE OUT WHO ELSA IS.
IF WE DECIDE ELSA SHOULD OUT TO HER SCUM READS, AND EVERYONE HAS THEIR SCUM READS OUT IN THE OPEN, THEN SCUM CAN USE THAT INFORMATION TO FIGURE OUT WHO ELSA IS.
IF A TOWNIE WHO THINKS ELSA IS SCUM LEARNS WHO ELSA IS, THEY WILL HAVE A HARD TIME NOT MAKING IT BLATANTLY OBVIOUS TO THE SCUM.
I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD PUT ONE SCUM READ OUT IN THE OPEN AND NOTHING ELSE. KEEP YOUR OWN PERSONAL NOTES IF YOU NEED TO. HAVE READS. SCUMHUNT. YOU CAN STILL DO THAT WITHOUT GIVING SCUM INFO THAT HELPS THEM.

Parama · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:16 am

In post 170, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 0, FakeGod wrote:Fortunately, Elsa is too strong for an assassin to handle alone. Town immediately wins if an assassin is lynched.
Quick phone post -

I think too many people are forgetting the first part of this facet of the set-up ... I don't inherently think scum have a PT to coordinate this game given this particular nature of the set-up.

Take-away - anyone trying to hint at Elsa's identity in thread should be turbo-lynched.

DUDE I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE EVEN TRYING TO IMPLY HERE OR HOW YOU CAME TO THIS CONCLUSION BUT PLEASE GO LOOK AT THE FIRST PM THE MOD SENT OUT
IT EXPLICITLY DESCRIBES THE ASSASSINS AS "THE MAFIA"
SO YES. THEY PROBABLY HAVE SOME WAY OR ANOTHER TO COORDINATE

Dunnstral · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:17 am

In post 162, lane0168 wrote:I like scum-hunting and Elsa claiming to town myself. With no reveals which greatly diminishes chance of accidentally revealing Elsa. I wouldn't trust myself to find scum before the town could find scum before scum could find me. So if else is anything like me, we should really consider not doing that plan.

In post 190, lane0168 wrote:
In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?
There isn't anyone who is better than I am at that point, and if you think you are yours delusional. Everyone has done almost nothing alignment indicative, and everyone has done almost no scum hunting. So stop

lol

Parama · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:18 am

In post 189, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?
Anyone but Postie, Parama, Ari, Dunn.

I have no real preference beyond that.

THAT THIS POST IS NOT BUNDLED WITH A DUNN UNVOTE IS BOTHERSOME
YES I KNOW THE ORIGINAL VOTE IS A JOKE VOTE
BUT YOU'RE SAYING NOT TO LYNCH HIM WHILE YOU LEAVE YOUR VOTE ON HIM
AND THAT BOTHERS ME A LOT

Parama · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:21 am

In post 190, lane0168 wrote:
In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?
There isn't anyone who is better than I am at that point, and if you think you are yours delusional. Everyone has done almost nothing alignment indicative, and everyone has done almost no scum hunting. So stop

UNVOTE:
VOTE: LANE

ALRIGHT. WE'RE POLICY LYNCHING UP IN THIS SUCKAHHHHHH
BECAUSE LANE HAS JUST TRIED TO PASS OF HIS PISS POOR PLAY WITH AN EXCUSE IMPLYING NOBODY ELSE IS DOING BETTER, WHICH IS JUST OBJECTIVELY UNTRUE. PRACTICALLY EVERYONE ELSE IS ALREADY PUTTING ACTUAL EFFORT AND PRODUCING DECENT CONTENT
AND I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT HE WILL CONTINUE TO BE USELESS ALL GAME IF WE ALLOW HIM TO LIVE
THAT'S JUST HOW BAD PLAYERS LIKE THIS FUNCTION
SO LET'S JUST PURGE THIS NOW
IF HE'S ELSA WE'RE TOTALLY BONED ANYWAYS

Aristophanes · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:31 am

In post 197, Parama wrote:
In post 189, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 188, Postie wrote:Aristo, I appreciate the humour but you're almost as bad as lane at this point.

Tell me
In post 169, Aristophanes wrote:Who are we lynching today?
Anyone but Postie, Parama, Ari, Dunn.

I have no real preference beyond that.
THAT THIS POST IS NOT BUNDLED WITH A DUNN UNVOTE IS BOTHERSOME
YES I KNOW THE ORIGINAL VOTE IS A JOKE VOTE
BUT YOU'RE SAYING NOT TO LYNCH HIM WHILE YOU LEAVE YOUR VOTE ON HIM
AND THAT BOTHERS ME A LOT

I thought about it tbh, but your vote was still on me despite our coordinating plans. I don't see any activity towards Dunn, so I don't see a reason it needs to be moved.

But sure.
UNVOTE:

I'll join you on Lane as long as we're not at L-1 or something.