Mini Normal 1857 (Game Over - Mafia Wins!)

JaeReed · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 7:43 pm

VC 1.02

Sesq (3)

: ssbm_Kyouko, Transcend, rb

rb (2)

: ironstove, drealmerz7

ironstove (1)

: iamafluffyrabbit

shannon (1)

: Lil Uzi Vert

Drone (1)

: Kohai

drealmerz7 (1)

: shannon

NOT VOTING (4)

: Impoetic, Drone, TTTT, Sesq

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-10 12:30:00)

Transcend is V/LA until the 26th.

Drone is V/LA until the 26th.

Kohai is V/LA until the 28th.

drealmerz7 · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 7:44 pm

if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 7:46 pm

In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would

How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?

rb · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:32 pm

In post 54, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I just made a note "48 - enter rb:gets on the first wagon that is picking up with real intent but attributes his vote to an rvs policy lynch"
His motivation here is either scummy or towny so I'm hoping he's town

No way dude. You mean my motivation could be scummy OR towny? What an enlightening post, it's so good I think I might just

VOTE: ssbm

rb · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:38 pm

In post 64, shannon wrote:
In post 61, drealmerz7 wrote:so I'm thinking scum would usually hop on a 4th spot in a situation like this and push the wagon along / at least see if it gets a little more traction...that they haven't eeeither means there is scum already on it and they don't want to double-down, or it is scum...
Or you know, maybe they haven't had time to vote yet? I'll have to go back and look at the wagon, but it's interesting that you're trying to narrow it down to either the wagon target or the wagon members, at this early stage.

VOTE: Drealmerz

I like this post. Shannon can be town for now

rb · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:40 pm

In post 74, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 72, drealmerz7 wrote:VOTE: rb
Mind sharing why?

Fear vote imo. At least it's what I'll tell myself to feel good.

rb · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:41 pm

This game's boring, we should lynch a scum or 5 to spice it up.

rb · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:41 pm

wheres kts when u need to fight for no reason over nothing??

Transcend · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:48 pm

VOTE: rb

im afraid this cannot be transcend and rb powerfuck the mafia part deux

Sesq · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:50 pm

In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?

Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:57 pm

In post 80, rb wrote:
In post 74, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 72, drealmerz7 wrote:VOTE: rb
Mind sharing why?
Fear vote imo. At least it's what I'll tell myself to feel good.

Maybe. I don't think he liked your vote on Sesq but at the same time I don't think that's the case because he said he was going to let things stew. His vote reads a little off to me because I thought he would wait a bit more before laying down a serious vote.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:00 pm

In post 84, Sesq wrote:
In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?
Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.

It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.

rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:01 pm

In post 86, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 84, Sesq wrote:
In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?
Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.
It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping his vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.

rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.

EBWOP

Sesq · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:02 pm

In post 86, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 84, Sesq wrote:
In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?
Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.
It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.

rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.

I fail to see how weird RVS junk makes anyone scum though :/

I will agree with rb, I have similar impulses.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:08 pm

In post 88, Sesq wrote:
In post 86, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 84, Sesq wrote:
In post 77, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 76, drealmerz7 wrote:if I wanted to at the time of the vote I would
How confident are you in your vote accomplishing something? On a scale of 1-10?
Sorry for taking so long to respond. On my wagon, I think the scummiest is probably ssbm, for voting for no reason. Again, might have been a joke, but I want to think we're at least partially out of RvS. As for scumreads on anyone... idk... rb seems a bit excited about things. Too excited, almost. He also was the third person on my wagon, so take that as you will. I'm taking a "nobody reads as anything, not voting" stance.
It's cool. SSBM originally at first randomly voted and then said he's keeping vote because he doesn't understand why you went back to RVS after Transcend believed that we were still in RVS.

rb is just trying to get the game moving, I noticed he tends to hate games moving at barely a crawl.
I fail to see how weird RVS junk makes anyone scum though :/

I will agree with rb, I have similar impulses.

Well the whole point of RVS is to catch hidden motives couched in the jokes and the shit posting.

While it usually works out in the end, this site does tend to go a little overboard reading into RVS. Somethings are really just silliness and NAI.

Sesq · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:09 pm

Can you enlighten me on what NAI means? Wiki doesn't have it on their abbreviation page, and I don't remember it from 2013.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:11 pm

In post 90, Sesq wrote:Can you enlighten me on what NAI means? Wiki doesn't have it on their abbreviation page, and I don't remember it from 2013.

Non-Alignment-Indicative.

rb · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:24 pm

In post 83, Transcend wrote:VOTE: rb

im afraid this cannot be transcend and rb powerfuck the mafia part deux

do u mean transcend sheeps rb powerfucking the mafia part deux?

rb · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:25 pm

rb · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:27 pm

we should have more ssbm votes tbh

sesq is probably town rn

rb · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:28 pm

probably town because it seems to be about the norm for town to be like, "i dunno what to do" but rb seems weird and maybe scummy

Sesq · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:29 pm

In post 49, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This is backwards to me
In post 36, Sesq wrote:And I mean, if you say RVS isn't over...

VOTE: Transcend
He says "If you say RVS isn't over" then votes you
because
you said that. That is not a random vote, that is a vote with a reason. So why pretend it is rvs? Why not call you out for perpetuating a gamestate that doesn't lead us any closer to scum?

This post got buried earlier, I'll respond now.

It wasn't technically a random vote, but it was a joke vote, because he was the one who said RVS wasn't over.

rb · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:33 pm

^ i don't even understand what's being said in the post above me

rb · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:34 pm

can someone translate it into a spiderman meme for me?

Sesq · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:36 pm

In post 98, rb wrote:can someone translate it into a spiderman meme for me?