Open 660 - White Flag (Game Over)

[BTD6_maker]

I am rather busy and can only post infrequently. However, I noticed Aubrey using text that was too small. This is a reminder that all text must be at least

this

size.

[Aubrey]

Noted.

[ssbm_Kyouko]

I also un-voted the MOMENT Eric requested a replacement, not after he was replaced and LQ displayed immense activity. So scratch this crap of me backtracking cause

"I realized LQ is more active and persistent than Eric."

I agree with this. I had forgotten about the positioning of your unvote.
But that brings me to another q.
If you really thought Eric was scummy, you shouldn't have unvoted before clearing his successor. I am not saying you are scummy or townie for doing that, but you can't use that argument in your favour either.

Still catching up but it looks to me like alban ignored the explanation aubrey gave. Eric slot was only a scum lean at the time for aubrey because of a few posts that could be attributed to playstyle. Since aubrey works from null reads towards an alignment it's not a stretch to see why he would unvote such an early game replace-out

[Aubrey]

I don't know how I feel about Toto. Please explain to me why it is so opportunistic? Like he said wouldn't it be more opportunistic regarding those who jumped on once the wagon began to build? In order...

--

Transcend: post 15 (total RVS)

Toto: Post 42 (Basically RVS it seems with like a hint of real questioning. Once he is pushed he says he wasn't fond of the suicidal play in post 125)

Lethargy: post 56 + 57 (continues adding onto the wagon saying he is deflecting and scum with Transcend. Latter part probably being RVS talk.)

Gamma: post 58 and post 61 (says obvious scum for the self vote. Eh. No, not necessarily.)

Dave: himself post 59 (I mean yea it's weird, but seems like playful town who doesn't care about being serious just yet. Seems a bit early for scum to freak out and think, "

Oh shit gotta do something crazy to get these peeps off me.

")

Ssbm: post 60 who is the final vote on the bandwagon who continued to add onto the wagon because he never addressed toto only to hop off immediately once he realizes the vote count, but was still interested in lynching/pushing the slot based on his comment in post 63.

--

So, why is Toto the most likely to be scum (should their be scum) on this wagon based on opportunism? I'd be interested in hearing Transcend chime in on this since he was the first person to argue this in post 97 + 101, but has now moved onto new votes.

--

phew. That outlines the whole Dave bandwagon pretty much.

[Aubrey]

post 324, I honestly have no clue what your talking about here. what is BW? $200? so lost.

[Gamma Emerald]

BW = bandwagon
200$ is a Monopoly joke

[LicketyQuickety]

I don't know how I feel about Toto. Please explain to me why it is so opportunistic? Like he said wouldn't it be more opportunistic regarding those who jumped on once the wagon began to build? In order...

--

Transcend: post 15 (total RVS)

Toto: Post 42 (Basically RVS it seems with like a hint of real questioning. Once he is pushed he says he wasn't fond of the suicidal play in post 125)

Lethargy: post 56 + 57 (continues adding onto the wagon saying he is deflecting and scum with Transcend. Latter part probably being RVS talk.)

Gamma: post 58 and post 61 (says obvious scum for the self vote. Eh. No, not necessarily.)

Dave: himself post 59 (I mean yea it's weird, but seems like playful town who doesn't care about being serious just yet. Seems a bit early for scum to freak out and think, "

Oh shit gotta do something crazy to get these peeps off me.

")

Ssbm: post 60 who is the final vote on the bandwagon who continued to add onto the wagon because he never addressed toto only to hop off immediately once he realizes the vote count, but was still interested in lynching/pushing the slot based on his comment in post 63.

--

So, why is Toto the most likely to be scum (should their be scum) on this wagon based on opportunism? I'd be interested in hearing Transcend chime in on this since he was the first person to argue this in post 97 + 101, but has now moved onto new votes.

--

phew. That outlines the whole Dave bandwagon pretty much.

OK, so I would like to make another point on how I read people here. This post alone is blatant IIoA, however, given context of who this player is I do not think they are using it as a Scum tactic to look like they are trying to contribute without contributing. This does not mean, however, that they cannot be Scum here. I can see a world where this player would make this post in an attempt to look Town.

[ssbm_Kyouko]

Bit yeah this game blew up while I was sleeping. I'm gonna eat breakfast and then go back and read again, just skimmed through from bed on my phone

Pedit: but aubrey does give analysis so how is that IIoA?

[Aubrey]

LQ, you do realize that post is directed at you. no? Did you not say that you were suspicious of Toto based on his opportunistic vote? Even though you are voting a slot that clearly isn't here right now and has only made one post so far.

[LicketyQuickety]

Bit yeah this game blew up while I was sleeping. I'm gonna eat breakfast and then go back and read again, just skimmed through from bed on my phone

Pedit: but aubrey does give analysis so how is that IIoA?

I'm actually more interested in what Aubre thinks here.

[Aubrey]

I'm a bit more interested in LQ's explanation.

[LicketyQuickety]

LQ, you do realize that post is directed at you. no? Did you not say that you were suspicious of Toto based on his opportunistic vote? Even though you are voting a slot that clearly isn't here right now and has only made one post so far.

So the post was directed at me and yet you ask Transcend what his thoughts are on the matter?

[LicketyQuickety]

I ofc have an explanation. I want to know if you think your post was IIoA or not.

[Gamma Emerald]

LQ plz don't be clueless that clearly maens in addition

[LicketyQuickety]

LQ plz don't be clueless that clearly maens in addition

I did not pick up on that, no.

[LicketyQuickety]

How about this: I will answer before Transcend does, but I want to know if Aubre thinks their post was IIoA or not first.

[Aubrey]

Of course. You are copying his original read, so I'm curious as to what he thinks as well now that time has passed. I thought it was obvious that my original post was directed at you. My apologies for not being so blunt.

My post is a simple outline of the bandwagon that unfolded against Dave, and a question as to why you have picked Toto out of all the votes as being the most opportunistic. followed by interest in hearing Transcends thoughts on the matter since it was his original read on Toto that you are also following. It wouldn't hurt to also know why Transcend found it to be the most opportunistic as well. Take it for what you will. Obviously If i was scum I wouldn't admit "

oh yea i wrote that shit up to look like I was trying to figure out the game and was a bunch of filler shit.

"

[Aubrey]

Of course meaning "Hell yea I want to hear Transcends thought on it"

[Aubrey]

Like seriously, read the post. I'm straight up asking why is Toto's initial vote opportunistic, and why is he the most opportunistic out of the lot.

[LicketyQuickety]

Of course. You are copying his original read, so I'm curious as to what he thinks as well now that time has passed. I thought it was obvious that my original post was directed at you. My apologies for not being so blunt.

My post is a simple outline of the bandwagon that unfolded against Dave, and a question as to why you have picked Toto out of all the votes as being the most opportunistic. followed by interest in hearing Transcends thoughts on the matter since it was his original read on Toto that you are also following. It wouldn't hurt to also know why Transcend found it to be the most opportunistic as well. Take it for what you will. Obviously If i was scum I wouldn't admit "

oh yea i wrote that shit up to look like I was trying to figure out the game and was a bunch of filler shit.

"

A few things. The topic came up, I haven't emphatically said I think it was the most opportunistic vote. I can't speak for Transcends thoughts on it. If you were wise, it would be very smart to admit that you made an IIoA post.

The reason I thought the vote was opportunistic is because there was such little basis for the vote all the while trying to make more of a reason out of it than there was. It also "felt" a lot stronger than an RVS vote. In other words, there was intent behind the vote that was unjustified.

[Aubrey]

I dont fully understand what difference it makes what I categorize my post as being. I didn't understand this opportunistic argument you were making (nor did I really understand Transcends original statement, but sadly I think he is full of it sometimes so I ignored it) and I mostly did it for myself and others who may want to reference back to the bandwagon. More importantly, I did it so we all would have an illustration of what occurred for when you and Transcend answered why you thought he was the most opportunistic out of the lot. Which btw, you never did.

Further more, you never addressed why you are not voting him (since you have expressed doubt) but instead are voting an empty slot who has only made one post and clearly isnt here. Your vote, based not the reason you gave, would be better suited if he had made a second post later down the line that held little substance in correlation to his lurativity.

Can we make that a new word here? Lurkativity. Has a nice ring to it.

[Aubrey]

If you think his post is opportunistic, but don't think the others are, then it is the most opportunistic vote on the bandwagon. No?

[Aubrey]

I will agree though. He lacks substance.

[Transcend]

Stop walling

It's d1

[Aubrey]

You're a wall! You wall.