Open 660 - White Flag (Game Over)

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:18 pm

In post 421, Aubrey wrote: I never said, Gamma you have to go. I said, if you're not interested in playing then you should consider replacing so that someone who really wants to play this set up can. Maybe not in that exact wordage, but my posts meant the same thing. He clearly joined and has been disinterested. He could have easily said, No I'm going to give it my all and play. I'm not going to take responsibility for his disinterest.

Eric, eh. Maybe I was a bit harsh, but I don't think I was out of line. He didn't make sense, and wasn't doing anything to progress the game. He then left, when all he had to do was actually attempt to push the game along in order to get me off of him. I'm not that sorry there.

Let me put it to you this way. You should have zero impact on if a player replaces out of a game or not. It is not proper etiquette to even suggest a player replace out for any reason.

Aubrey · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:26 pm

I'll consider that for future reference I suppose. Gamma, I apologize if I pushed you over the edge. I don't always realize how much bite my posts can have sometimes. Granted I don't fully understand joining a game that you don't seem to passionate about just to fill it up, but that is none of my business.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:13 pm

In post 422, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay I'll come back so alban doesn't have to worry about PMing me
I'll try my best to contribute

Missed this the first time around. This is good, I'm glad.

BTD6_maker · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:22 pm

ScumDeersAreVeryTasty has been prodded.

Also, please note that PMing anyone about this game is outside communication and is strictly forbidden.

ScumDeersAreVeryTasty · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 9:16 pm

Oh, fuck.

I forgot.

@Host: V/LA till December 9

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 9:34 pm

UNVOTE: Deer

@MOD, When does day end? I couldn't find it on the first page.

alban · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Sun Dec 04, 2016 9:34 pm

@BTD6, noted.

Aubrey · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:04 am

I see nothing has really happened since I went to bed. Alban has a town lean.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:23 am

In post 432, Aubrey wrote:Alban has a town lean.

Why?

Aubrey · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:56 am

I feel like the likelyhood of his reaction to gamma's abrupt desires to possibly leave came from a younger townie's mindset. It's a weak read, but it's better than what I have for a number of other slots. If he is scum, and I'm wrong, I feel as if I might be able to catch it later down the line since that would mean he is an aggressive scum.

lol hope you don't expect super solid reads right now. I rarely give strong town reads d1. Btw, it's clear deer is a empty slot until his VLA ends, so where is your vote gonna go? Seems like a waste to keep it there in my eyes.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:58 am

I could prolly vote Keyen.

Aubrey · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:02 am

And gamma said there wouldn't be any twists. I was banking you were going to say Toto.

Aubrey · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:05 am

I waver on Keyen.

Aubrey · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:14 am

Lmao. Sorry. I missed your unvote. On my phone.

chilledtea · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:27 am

UNVOTE
VOTE : Lethargy

This slot is 100% scum. Aubrey has moved up in my eyes. Currently looking at scum possibilities of lethargy, gamma and transcend, maybe ssbm and toto and cracker.

Cracker and deer haven't done much from what I gather.

Don't like gamma at all and he is my next best guess for scum.

Transcend is doing very little in comparison to his meta. His vote on toto is also unexplained.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:29 am

In post 439, chilledtea wrote:
UNVOTE
VOTE : Lethargy

This slot is 100% scum. Aubrey has moved up in my eyes. Currently looking at scum possibilities of lethargy, gamma and transcend, maybe ssbm and toto and cracker.

Cracker and deer haven't done much from what I gather.

Don't like gamma at all and he is my next best guess for scum.

Transcend is doing very little in comparison to his meta. His vote on toto is also unexplained.

In post 395, Cracker wrote:Sorry going to catch up later today I have been busy.

Yup, I can go that way.

VOTE: Cracker

chilledtea · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:30 am

That post from lethargy where he/she gives his "analysis" of the game when pushed was the most ridiculous one.

keyenpeydee · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:35 am

I also find Lethargy being scummy.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:35 am

In post 441, chilledtea wrote:That post from lethargy where he/she gives his "analysis" of the game when pushed was the most ridiculous one.

Really? They at least provided a reads list. More than a lot of people have done.

chilledtea · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:49 am

In post 443, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 441, chilledtea wrote:That post from lethargy where he/she gives his "analysis" of the game when pushed was the most ridiculous one.
Really? They at least provided a reads list. More than a lot of people have done.

It feels fake. Extremely brief in nature and seems like it is done with the intent of looking like doing something rather than honest.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:51 am

In post 444, chilledtea wrote:
In post 443, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 441, chilledtea wrote:That post from lethargy where he/she gives his "analysis" of the game when pushed was the most ridiculous one.
Really? They at least provided a reads list. More than a lot of people have done.
It feels fake. Extremely brief in nature and seems like it is done with the intent of looking like doing something rather than honest.

What cues you in specifically to tell you it looks "fake?"

chilledtea · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:59 am

In post 445, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 444, chilledtea wrote:
In post 443, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 441, chilledtea wrote:That post from lethargy where he/she gives his "analysis" of the game when pushed was the most ridiculous one.
Really? They at least provided a reads list. More than a lot of people have done.
It feels fake. Extremely brief in nature and seems like it is done with the intent of looking like doing something rather than honest.
What cues you in specifically to tell you it looks "fake?"

The fact that it is brief and covers a large spectrum of players. There is a small tonal shift in their posts as well from the beginning of the game.

Remember their post where they say how it is time for them to start doing something (because of my earlier suspicion on them)?

They are lurking and seem disconnected from the game, even with this small reads list. They seem to have not much interest in directly interacting with others and frankly writing two lines on several people's play is easier.

Aubrey · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:09 am

I agree with Chilled in the fact that it seems like the slot is actively lurking (even with one head in a VLA status). Twice now the slot become more active once pressured, but when it is not pressured it is reserved. As I said, it appears to be coasting instead of proactively trying to move the game forward. That read list, coupled with its "

afterwards I'll answer any questions

", seems just like a quick fix in order to alleviate pressure and resume its lurking behavior.

I wonder if it's scared to play without the aid of its other head, or scared to make moves the other head doesn't agree with, but I find it hard to put to much care into the thought due to the slots overwhelmingly laid back nature before the VLA.

Not to mention saying "

I'm just to lazy to play

" doesn't exactly help either.

Lethargy · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:17 am

In post 447, Aubrey wrote: I wonder if it's scared to play without the aid of its other head, or scared to make moves the other head doesn't agree with, but I find it hard to put to much care into the thought due to the slots overwhelmingly laid back nature before the VLA. Not to mention saying "
I'm just to lazy to play
" doesn't exactly help either.

That'll be the one. I'm new to the game and my other head is a lot better than me in general. I mostly want to observe in my first few games and gain expirience rather than attempt anything while I still have no real idea what I'm doing. Apologies if you don't like me playing that way.
The "lazy" bit wasn't meant very seriously.

-Mercy

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:32 am

In post 446, chilledtea wrote:
In post 445, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 444, chilledtea wrote:
In post 443, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 441, chilledtea wrote:That post from lethargy where he/she gives his "analysis" of the game when pushed was the most ridiculous one.
Really? They at least provided a reads list. More than a lot of people have done.
It feels fake. Extremely brief in nature and seems like it is done with the intent of looking like doing something rather than honest.
What cues you in specifically to tell you it looks "fake?"

The fact that it is brief and covers a large spectrum of players.
There is a small tonal shift in their posts as well from the beginning of the game.

Remember their post where they say how it is time for them to start doing something (because of my earlier suspicion on them)?

They are lurking and seem disconnected from the game, even with this small reads list. They seem to have not much interest in directly interacting with others and frankly writing two lines on several people's play is easier.

I don't disagree with most of this, but the bold: that is kinda the point to a reads list... it allows people to see where they stand on everyone in the game at one time and give a brief summary as to why.