Mini Normal 1857 (Game Over - Mafia Wins!)

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1525 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:43 am

deer in the headlights, watching his deer-friend get splattered

Titus · Post Post #1526 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:09 am

In post 1514, Sesq wrote:
In post 1511, TTTT wrote:Imp is getting off easy here. His posts today are bad.
Iron continues to lurk.
Probably scum in ^there
I checked him, and yep, he's online today, and yep, he didn't post anything. Might as well.

VOTE: ironstove

Can you also explain why Impo's posts are bad? One Titus is enough.

Did he post in any other games?

Sesq · Post Post #1527 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:48 am

In post 1516, drealmerz7 wrote:sesq you not feeling the LUV lynch at all/that he's scum? he's much better than ironstove at this point

I feel like his one-shot tracker claim might have merit. With the JOAT before being all one-shots, it might be a trend. It's weak, but I'm not quite ready to place a vote on him yet. FOS though.

Titus wrote:Did he post in any other games?

He did not. Thanks for keeping things up to standard.

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1528 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:44 am

In post 200, Impoetic wrote:
In post 185, Kohai wrote:I'm getting off work in 5 hours. I'll make my cases then. For now, FOS on:

1. Impoetic
2. Dreal
3. RB

I'm fairly confident at least one of these is scum. I will further make my case when I get off.

In post 188, Kohai wrote:Impoetic Is literally saying that she wouldn't do X as scum because it is obv anti town, yet she does X anyway; therefore she isn't scum. Yeah, I'm fairly convinced Impoetic is scum.
so in the space of one post, you went from saying there was 1 scum in 3 people to
completely ignoring me
whilst addressing the rest of the table and saying you're convinced I'm scum

all without seriously responding to anything I've said and only saying that my attempt at actual productive discussion over it is "bad wifom and contrived"

and you certainly aren't attempting to see what i'm saying for what it is. I'm not saying i'm town, i'm saying you voted me for being antitown -- something town does sometimes -- and I want to know why you think that makes me scum.

It's not like I malignantly quickhammered. I joke-voted. I'm telling you there isn't scum motivation in joke-voting, and it's only bad for town because the culprit is town in the first place; if I were mafia, I'd be giving town the rope with which to hang me for... what? A tiny chance to get one townie lynched early in d1... which would require two townies messing up and doing the same thing you're saying i'm scum for?

This post should be evidence that Gerry can't be scum with Impoetic or d7 based on the Kohai FoSes imo. rb turned out to be right and I don't see any scum, no matter how bold, putting both of their scum partners under FoS so early with just one town amongst their 3 suspects

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1529 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:47 am

@LUV - What I'm saying is since rb is flipped and Impoetic is your suspect it's highly unlikely Gerry is the 3rd in that scenario. Are you still on Impoetic for that perceived "scum slip" by d7 early day 1?

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1530 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:56 am

So Sesq you pinged me early day 1 but the way rb treated you while on his wagon makes me think you aren't scum with him. Are you just voting ironstove because he was online and didn't post, or is there more to it? LUV doesn't "feel" like the right lynch right now but I'm having trouble finding who makes more sense so I want to hear as many opinions as I can get even if you think it's far-fetched.

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1531 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 11:02 am

Crazy theory I'm nurturing: Impoetic/Titus scum team. The main reason I am TRing both of them is a combination of the conversation they had with each other and relying on Transcend's gut reads. Problem is, day talk is on and that whole conversation could have been rehearsed in the scum PT. Rabbit judged Impoetic as town for how fast she responded, saying that if she was scum it would be really hard to fake those responses so fast. Also note that neither of them would vote for rb yesterday iirc (can't check on mobile atm)

JaeReed · Post Post #1532 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:52 pm

VC 2.04

Lil Uzi Vert (3)

: gerryoat, drealmerz7, TTTT

ironstove (1)

: Sesq

NOT VOTING (7)

: Impoetic, Titus, ironstove, Drone, shannon, Lil Uzi Vert, ssbm_Kyouko

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-22 01:30:00)

Drone has been prodded. As the prod falls over the weekend, they have 72 hours to post.

Titus · Post Post #1533 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:19 pm

In post 1527, Sesq wrote:
In post 1516, drealmerz7 wrote:sesq you not feeling the LUV lynch at all/that he's scum? he's much better than ironstove at this point
I feel like his one-shot tracker claim might have merit. With the JOAT before being all one-shots, it might be a trend. It's weak, but I'm not quite ready to place a vote on him yet. FOS though.

Titus wrote:Did he post in any other games?
He did not. Thanks for keeping things up to standard.

Keeping things up to standard?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1534 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:24 pm

comment on your diligence at keeping all the things tidy?

but ummm, that's a great comment there after being absent for a bit...

I was hoping for more, like, ya know, why did you think rb was town?

and ohhh, what about LUVs track claim? you cool he gave it up like that, and did what he did?

orrr, got anything?

Titus · Post Post #1535 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:27 pm

In post 1534, drealmerz7 wrote:comment on your diligence at keeping all the things tidy?

but ummm, that's a great comment there after being absent for a bit...

I was hoping for more, like, ya know, why did you think rb was town?

and ohhh, what about LUVs track claim? you cool he gave it up like that, and did what he did?

orrr, got anything?

Who are you talking to?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1536 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:28 pm

you!

I was saying I think the sesq comment was about you doing the diligence to check on activity

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1537 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:29 pm

Sesq · Post Post #1538 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:36 pm

In post 1530, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:So Sesq you pinged me early day 1 but the way rb treated you while on his wagon makes me think you aren't scum with him. Are you just voting ironstove because he was online and didn't post, or is there more to it? LUV doesn't "feel" like the right lynch right now but I'm having trouble finding who makes more sense so I want to hear as many opinions as I can get even if you think it's far-fetched.

It turns out he didn't post, which was my mistake for not checking, but his play yesterday was still very scummy, and my vote is carrying over. LUV does feel mildly scummy, but less that iron right now. Still watching.

shannon · Post Post #1539 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:55 pm

In post 1531, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Crazy theory I'm nurturing: Impoetic/Titus scum team. The main reason I am TRing both of them is a combination of the conversation they had with each other and relying on Transcend's gut reads. Problem is, day talk is on and that whole conversation could have been rehearsed in the scum PT. Rabbit judged Impoetic as town for how fast she responded, saying that if she was scum it would be really hard to fake those responses so fast. Also note that neither of them would vote for rb yesterday iirc (can't check on mobile atm)

Now this ... this is interesting.

It's also interesting that Titus is being deliberately obtuse, by pretending not to know that D7 was talking to her in 1534.

We can always come back to LUV if we need to, but I think we should push this for info. It's so out there it just might be true.

VOTE: Titus

Titus · Post Post #1540 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:57 pm

In post 1536, drealmerz7 wrote:you!

I was saying I think the sesq comment was about you doing the diligence to check on activity

I have been here daily, so why would due diligence be checking my activity levels?

JaeReed · Post Post #1541 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:57 pm

VC 2.05

Lil Uzi Vert (3)

: gerryoat, drealmerz7, TTTT

ironstove (1)

: Sesq

Titus (1)

: shannon

NOT VOTING (6)

: Impoetic, Titus, ironstove, Drone, Lil Uzi Vert, ssbm_Kyouko

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-22 01:30:00)

ironstove has been prodded. As the prod falls over the weekend, they have 72 hours to post.

Titus · Post Post #1542 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:58 pm

In post 1534, drealmerz7 wrote:comment on your diligence at keeping all the things tidy?

but ummm, that's a great comment there after being absent for a bit...

I was hoping for more, like, ya know, why did you think rb was town?

and ohhh, what about LUVs track claim? you cool he gave it up like that, and did what he did?

orrr, got anything?

I thought RB was town due to scum not wanting my counterwagons. The vote patterns are not making much sense to me.

The track claim from Uzi is non sensical.

Titus · Post Post #1543 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 4:00 pm

In post 1539, shannon wrote:
In post 1531, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Crazy theory I'm nurturing: Impoetic/Titus scum team. The main reason I am TRing both of them is a combination of the conversation they had with each other and relying on Transcend's gut reads. Problem is, day talk is on and that whole conversation could have been rehearsed in the scum PT. Rabbit judged Impoetic as town for how fast she responded, saying that if she was scum it would be really hard to fake those responses so fast. Also note that neither of them would vote for rb yesterday iirc (can't check on mobile atm)
Now this ... this is interesting.

It's also interesting that Titus is being deliberately obtuse, by pretending not to know that D7 was talking to her in 1534.

We can always come back to LUV if we need to, but I think we should push this for info. It's so out there it just might be true.

VOTE: Titus

I love a push "for information". Really? Cannot figure out my role at night. Sucks to be you.

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1544 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 4:02 pm

In post 1540, Titus wrote:
In post 1536, drealmerz7 wrote:you!

I was saying I think the sesq comment was about you doing the diligence to check on activity
I have been here daily, so why would due diligence be checking my activity levels?

nah
you checked ironstove's is what I meant, doing the diligence on that

how are you feeling about the time elapse of this:

In post 1503, Titus wrote:It makes sense, but I want to hear him out. Worst case, we get information.

at this point? still waiting to hear more or??

gerryoat · Post Post #1545 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:37 pm

vote uzi

Impoetic · Post Post #1546 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:46 pm

In post 789, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I mean they're in really poor taste but iron's posts about Kohai's vla st least look like genuine scum hunting. Don't tr him yet but don't think he's today's lynch anymore for me. Want to hear more from rb before I vote I think but will need to check my notes once I'm off phone. Also will get to Impoetic when I'm home, it's hard to fully address walls from phone.

In post 790, Sesq wrote:
In post 765, ironstove wrote:health reasons = suffering too much anxiety trying to figure out a post to craft to get him out of the hole he's dug himself into after I called out his BS to link me to his other games and would rather dump the problem onto another player instead.
Nobody has ever faked being sick to leave, or left due to suspicion. Is this projecting? Probably not. Also, I was going to unvote you for your early posts, and I don't see this as a scum move as much as I do a dick move, so I'm unvoting.

UNVOTE: ironstove

MFOS: ironstove

also, due to his recent prod-dodging shenanigans and general disengagement, VOTE: rb Get your head in the game.

In post 1511, TTTT wrote:Imp is getting off easy here. His posts today are bad.
Iron continues to lurk.
Probably scum in ^there

My posts today are nonexistent

and lurking is antitown but why do you say it's scum?

ugh i'm sorry i've been meaning to catch up on this game but just... blech

Impoetic · Post Post #1547 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:47 pm

oh my GOD i had 2 posts in +q sorry

Impoetic · Post Post #1548 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:47 pm

I think I was just saying I agree with them tho

Titus · Post Post #1549 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:17 pm

In post 1544, drealmerz7 wrote:
In post 1540, Titus wrote:
In post 1536, drealmerz7 wrote:you!

I was saying I think the sesq comment was about you doing the diligence to check on activity
I have been here daily, so why would due diligence be checking my activity levels?
nah
you checked ironstove's is what I meant, doing the diligence on that

how are you feeling about the time elapse of this:

In post 1503, Titus wrote:It makes sense, but I want to hear him out. Worst case, we get information.
at this point? still waiting to hear more or??

I still am but I am in porn mode. I will know it when I see it. I want to know why no counterwagon. My gut says lynch TTT but it is wholly unsubstantiated.