Open 661: Pick Your Poison [Game Over]

Vedith · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:22 am

In post 524, Realeo wrote:LQ is town????

Of course he is.

Realeo · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:26 am

Like, I put LQ at NAI and I am saying LQ at NAI not because I am reaction testing?

Like how??

Realeo · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:26 am

When I say NAI, I mean null obv.

Vedith · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:29 am

I don't get what you mean?

LQ is town, you can have my scouts honour there.

Spoiler: LQ to look only, anyone else looking is a scum claim

Realeo · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:30 am

I mean, I have put TB and LQ as "frustated player" but I haven't decide if it's a town frustation or scum frustation.

Realeo · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:31 am

In post 528, Vedith wrote:I don't get what you mean?
LQ is town, you can have my scouts honour there.

Spoiler: LQ to look only, anyone else looking is a scum claim
Don't screw me on this LQ, you only get the 1 scout honour!

Can we have more vote on this?

town!Vedith would not float the reasoning. His reasoning can be shitty, but not floaty.

Vedith · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:34 am

Town Vedith does do a lot of things people don't like. :<

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:57 am

In post 510, Aeronaut wrote:
In post 253, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 251, Cheesy wrote:Ok I know you tried to be mean and make yourself feel better
but you've pretty much confirmed I'm town here.

Well I guess we've now confirmed that LQ and Cheesy definitely can't be scum together

thank the good lord for memes

No you can't
LQ made the same mistake I believe

Realeo · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:59 am

In post 531, Vedith wrote:Town Vedith does do a lot of things people don't like. :<

Town Vedith can make a case, even if the case is bad. Even if the case is bad, the consistency of Town Vedith is still obvious.

*cough* Mislead 2 *cough*

Realeo · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:00 am

Like, aren't I mod confirmed mafia. Where's that attitude, Vedith?

Vedith · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:12 am

In post 534, Realeo wrote:Like, aren't I mod confirmed mafia. Where's that attitude, Vedith?

Do you want to be mod confirmed Mafia?

tojam2 · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:28 am

In post 482, Cheesy wrote:
In post 378, Cheesy wrote:
In post 374, tojam2 wrote:I'd vote for cheesy, he just doesn't sit right with me (up to p.13), but I need a VC.
What do you need VC for?

In post 376, tojam2 wrote:Oh, I'm not going to say my logical conclusion from that because it will get Ved nk'd, this would line up with his cop comment as well.
Come again? Did you just try to out him as a pr while saying you don't wanna do it?
Respond

I can't be sure in that situation whether I should conf him town or wait.

Realeo · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:46 am

In post 535, Vedith wrote:
In post 534, Realeo wrote:Like, aren't I mod confirmed mafia. Where's that attitude, Vedith?
Do you want to be mod confirmed Mafia?

So you do scumread me or not scumread me.

Vedith · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:36 am

You sir, are scum.

culted · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:48 am

sup boys

culted · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:52 am

In post 505, Aeronaut wrote:At first glance I took this as kind of role-fishy, but at second glance I realized who was posting, and now feel it's probably NAI.

20 + words to call an rvs post null.

Throw this in the scumpile.

culted · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:53 am

Can I get thoughts on thinkbig voting me for not explaining my read on realeo and then unvoting me before I explained it?

Doesn't seem like a genuine read progression but maybe I'm omgusing.

Cheesy · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:21 am

In post 540, culted wrote:
In post 505, Aeronaut wrote:At first glance I took this as kind of role-fishy, but at second glance I realized who was posting, and now feel it's probably NAI.
20 + words to call an rvs post null.

Throw this in the scumpile.

10+ words to call a slot scum.

Throw this in the hypocritepile.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:22 am

That's not being hypocritical if it was necessary.

culted · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:23 am

Thanks gamma saved me an eyeroll there.

Cheesy · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:29 am

In post 543, Gamma Emerald wrote:That's not being hypocritical if it was necessary.

It was shit, that's what it was. Take the first sentence from someone's catchup, nitpick on it, call the slot scum- boom no need to analyse anything further!

aronagrundy · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:48 am

In post 540, culted wrote:
In post 505, Aeronaut wrote:At first glance I took this as kind of role-fishy, but at second glance I realized who was posting, and now feel it's probably NAI.
20 + words to call an rvs post null.

Throw this in the scumpile.

Do you think people treated it as an RVS post?

aronagrundy · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:04 am

VOTE: nn30

His ISO is literally all cheesy. He's either talking to cheesy or asking other people about cheesy. His only other real case was against realeo, who he just stopped questioning despite a response from realeo.

Cheesy · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:05 am

Guess I'm an interesting person

culted · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:10 am

In post 545, Cheesy wrote:It was shit, that's what it was. Take the first sentence from someone's catchup, nitpick on it, call the slot scum- boom no need to analyse anything further!

Was there anything in the catchup you thought looked town?

aronagrundy wrote:Do you think people treated it as an RVS post?

I'm actually partially scumreading tb for reacting awkwardly to that post.

I'm not sure how someone could take a post like that at face value and not shrug it off as rvs fluff nonsense.
Which is what aero did, just in a dressed up guise-of-content sorta way.