UNVOTE: Kraska77
VOTE: MariaR
I don't think Jackel should be lynched with vengeful active. Best outcome is scum/town tradeoff(actually I guess it'd be scum lynch, venge fail? Effectively the same as would be achieved if he is scum and lynched while power is inactive). If he is scum, then it's clearly better to lynch when the power is inactive. If he's town, then we risk a second town death. Reading the following is not very reassuring in the likelihood that town-Jackel would make a good choice:
In post 3119, Jackel98 wrote:I'll be honest: I've hardly been developing reads besides slightly remembering who I like and dislike at times. I don't remember why I had been townreading Kraska or you, but I do agree that lynching me would the Drone lynch again. I honestly don't know who else to vengekill, and you're not telling me who you'd want dead, besides me.
The only way I can see this being a good move is if we get our ducks in a row and agree on his target beforehand as if it were a second lynch in town-Jackel scenario.
In post 2947, kraska77 wrote: In post 2907, Kison wrote:Top picks would be McMeno & Milkshake for their inexplicable, opportunistic hops on the Drone wagon & overall poor/minimal scum hunting / contribution(though in Milkshake's case I liked MoI). Uzi for his early D1 play, being consistently present but not really scum hunting, large chunks of time where he's present but not using his vote. Poor Drone vote justification despite not being the worst.
I'd join a Mcmenno wagon in a heartbeat but I don't think it has traction today
Maria and jackel are both confirmed to have governer cards btw. Which of the two do you think is scummier and would rather lynch first?
You can the answer in
post 2892
. Maria's play is definitely scummier. She's here and actively posting, but in a distracting way and not
really
looking for scum whereas Jackel is simply less engaged(again, true of many others in this game).
In post 3038, Fishythefish wrote:
In post 2892, Kison wrote:Did I miss something? Is the only reason you're limiting to these four because RB flipped town and had scum reads on them? Just because he flipped town does not mean he is infallible. Obviously we should take the reads into consideration, but I don't see why we should lock ourselves down to them.
rb had a lot of reads out there, which were quite static. If those reads were wrong, rb was very unthreatening for scum. His small pool of potential scum are therefore a good whack more likely than the average to be scum. Without a really excellent case on anyone, that's where we should be lynching.
Inclined to agree in this case also taking into account 3 1/2 days remaining till deadline and unlikely anything else will catch steam at this point. Not used to such short deadlines.