In post 311, BNL wrote:I have issues with IJ on this page.
IJ, is it scum motivated to be not voting instead of voting next strongest scumread?
It's not town motivated when there's a certain amount of time when someone has no scumreads and doesn't care or doesn't even mention it, especially for the normally hyperactive gamma. It makes a lot more sense for scum to just wait for something to come along that they can call scummy.
The more I think about this post the more it bothers me, I don't know why
you don't know why?
In post 290, Infinite Justice wrote:
I feel like town would engage or something, gamma seems to be saying that just to be the first one to say it
-Inf
but then you do?
why does it "seem" that way? what advantage does it get him for being the first to say it? how would it have been different in a genuine "first to say it" post?
Why did you ask the question if it won't change your mind one way or the other? If it matters at all to anyone else I'll answer it but there's no way you're getting out of your tunnel.
In post 311, BNL wrote:I have issues with IJ on this page.
IJ, is it scum motivated to be not voting instead of voting next strongest scumread?
It's not town motivated when there's a certain amount of time when someone has no scumreads and doesn't care or doesn't even mention it, especially for the normally hyperactive gamma. It makes a lot more sense for scum to just wait for something to come along that they can call scummy.
-Inf
In post 311, BNL wrote:I have issues with IJ on this page.
IJ, is it scum motivated to be not voting instead of voting next strongest scumread?
It's not town motivated when there's a certain amount of time when someone has no scumreads and doesn't care or doesn't even mention it, especially for the normally hyperactive gamma. It makes a lot more sense for scum to just wait for something to come along that they can call scummy.
-Inf
So lack of town motivation means scum motivation?
Waiting around for something to call scummy instead of being proactive about it is scum-motivated.
Really don't see your issue here, it's pretty straightforward.
In post 310, Infinite Justice wrote:I have issues with you just saying that now without pointing it out before. I expected if you townread zach after the fakehammer thing for you to immediately vote for who you think is scum or try to find them.
VOTE: gamma
Why did you scumread SAJ before his latest post?
-Inf
His jump off of the RVS wagon earlier felt like scum dodging responsibility for a mislynch.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
Dreamer, do you think you could at least try to critically analyze the behavior of everyone that isn't BnL and I because otherwise you'll just be stuck in confbias the whole game
IJ - sure but it'd be swell if my points got addressed as well and not just discarded as they have been since the beginning by you and BNL for non-reasons
In post 342, drealmerz7 wrote:IJ - sure but it'd be swell if my points got addressed as well and not just discarded as they have been since the beginning by you and BNL for non-reasons
If I see evidence that you're actually trying to solve my alignment, I'll answer your questions, but I don't think it's unreasonable not to engage with you if I don't think anything productive will come out of it.
In post 341, Infinite Justice wrote:Dreamer, do you think you could at least try to critically analyze the behavior of everyone that isn't BnL and I because otherwise you'll just be stuck in confbias the whole game
-Inf
I sort of agree here it's disconcerting to be so rigid this early in the game
