In post 310, Infinite Justice wrote:I have issues with you just saying that now without pointing it out before. I expected if you townread zach after the fakehammer thing for you to immediately vote for who you think is scum or try to find them.
VOTE: gamma
Why did you scumread SAJ before his latest post?
-Inf
Actually, why didn't you ask the same question to Ari?
Tbh it's just cause he wasn't on my radar already. But he gets scumpoints for that to
In post 449, BNL wrote:Wait IJ you aren't wanting people to compromise you just want a claim from Gamma don't you?
I do want people to compromise, and it's looking like gamma is the best compromise.
In post 400, Zachstralkita wrote:yea no one really owes you anything. Why are you placing yourself on this pedestal and limiting how much information people can get from you?
I was just being facetious of course you guys can ask me about whatever.
I just always get bombarded when I post lists like that and some reads are hard to explain ya know?
IJ just seems to get more scummy the more they post, im slowly swinging there way.
As for Zach, i just finished a game that was Town!Zach, he played the same way there. He is offensive and attacks whoever votes him like they should know he is town. He postes some mean things and was active in the game i played with him. He does seem more subdued here and more lurkery but his posts here still contain salt lkke in the other game. I really want to scumread Zach for his overall playstyle but it has stayed consistent with his previous town game so i give a townlean to Zach.
In post 402, Infinite Justice wrote:Like, not giving views as town is a strategy. (That's why I kept my vote on BnL so long). That seemed to be the strategy culted was using up until now, then he gives away his whole readslist and leaves which reads he explains up to the whims of the town (and scum btw). Doesn't seem like much of a strategy to me.
Quick correction here.
The reads I explain are up to the whims of I.
Only exception would be like, you could push me for not explaining a read I guess. But if I refuse to then it's not because I'm scum or I can't it's because I don't really feel the need to.
Which kinda falls back into bullet and IJ giving me a little too much benefit of the doubt based on their playstyles and what they've found pushable so far.
Makes not a lot of sense I'll explain it better once I'm caught up.
In post 408, Infinite Justice wrote:Because you don't like my early-game strategy and can't argue with it, it must be scumtactics. You have to realize how confbiased you are, dude.
If BnL has to be our compromise I'll put him at L-1 but i'm pretty sure he's town
culted, Ari, and BnL really need to consolidate. We have just under 4 days and we need to have time to respond to a claim. Which wagon you choose is up to you.
In post 402, Infinite Justice wrote:Like, not giving views as town is a strategy. (That's why I kept my vote on BnL so long). That seemed to be the strategy culted was using up until now, then he gives away his whole readslist and leaves which reads he explains up to the whims of the town (and scum btw). Doesn't seem like much of a strategy to me.
Quick correction here.
The reads I explain are up to the whims of I.
Only exception would be like, you could push me for not explaining a read I guess. But if I refuse to then it's not because I'm scum or I can't it's because I don't really feel the need to.
Does that make more sense?
Ok, but giving the readslist by itself is an issue in that context imo.
