Open 667: Day 3

[Creature]

Feeling better about a Snarky lynch.

[Börk Börk]

Feeling better about a Snarky lynch.

After two posts of his, one of which was confirming his spot?

[Creature]

It's not even in his posts, it's a gut feeling.

[keyenpeydee]

@Bork, Can you quote things that looked 'useful' to you?

Give me a good reason to do so.

Your posts are unbelievable and fake.

Says the person who has contributed fuck-all to the discussion.

Asking someone to quote someone else's useful posts is both the laziest and least useful thing anyone has done so far.

Why?
We have four pages. If you're looking for content to make reads off then go find it yourself. I've explained my read, and I feel that there is no need to back it up with evidence, especially when the request is phrased in sich a way that puts the accused individual in a more positive light. This just makes me think that you two are scumbuddies.
And why isn't it useful? Because you can do your own scumhunting without piggybacking me.

Says the one who's throwing scum reads based on shit posts. You clearly and obviously refused to do it because 'your basing your reads on non-game related talks (shit posts)' and that's what makes it so fake and unbelievable.
You also refused to quote some 'helpful' posts because there's 4 pages and can't seem to see a helpful post to solidify your reads against me and you also try to make me appear scum by being a fucking lazy scumass person.

VOTE: Bork

Why do you think bringing the alt talk make me scum?

[JasonWazza]

Vote Count 1.5

[2] SnarkySnowman: Creature, Celtic,
[2] Keyenpeydee: Indigo, Pepchoninga,
[2] Pepchoninga: Vijarada, Börk Börk,
[1] Vijarada: Gamma Emerald,
[1] Börk Börk: keyenpeydee,

Not voting: SnarkySnowman,

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch

Deadline:(expired on 2017-01-20 16:41:09)

[Pepchoninga]

Seeing four pages here already, I got my hopes up that there would be some proper discussion to pick apart and use to scumhunt. But alas, it's a whole lot of fluff and alt fishing.

VOTE: pepchoninga for contributing almost nothing useful despite having the highest postcount. Because that's not useful at all, and yet artificially inflating one's postcount can prove to be useful as a false argument against one's lynch at a later stage.

Ok, I will take this as a "Bye RVS vote"

Your post is absolutely bad for these reasons: In those 4 pages, we have started a conversation. This conversation is full of fluff. And it was untill we got somethings real to discuss about. Creature seemed to want to give a good thing for us to prodice content but he basically ended the topic himself. There is nothing for us to do except keep posting until we have something real to talk about. And your vote is exactly that. Using the not producing content as an argument for a lynch in the first 4 pages is bad.

[Pepchoninga]

Feeling better about a Snarky lynch.

After two posts of his, one of which was confirming his spot?

You voted me for around 10-15 posts one of wich was confirming my spot and the other were shit posts mostly not related to the game, so you are one to talk.

[keyenpeydee]

@Bork, are you to new to mafia?

[Celtic]

Keyen is town based on his calm and logical reaction to the votes on him.

[Pepchoninga]

Keyen is town based on his calm and logical reaction to the votes on him.

That isn't good reasoning, since:
1. He has no need to react differently, since it's early game.
2. Scum are much likelier to try and react calm to votes as to not slip something.

[Celtic]

I suppose that's true, but his calmness seems genuine.

[keyenpeydee]

@Pep, what is the bad reasoning? Mine or Celtic?

[Pepchoninga]

@Pep, what is the bad reasoning? Mine or Celtic?

Well Celtics. It's not something that you should base your read on.

[Gamma Emerald]

Welp

Was this a scum welp or town welp? Be crystal clear on this, your fate depends on it. You going to flip on me at the end like Kaiser Soze?

It was a "I can find Indie's main probably if I wished" welp.
Love the reference.

[Gamma Emerald]

Bork Bork's SRs are a bit unfounded but I'm not sure that makes him scum.

[Celtic]

So I'm currently reading key as town for his composure, and Creature for his bold early game claim. I don't scum would make a such a claim because of the attention it draws.

No one seems too scummy just yet, but this is a good start so far.

[Indigo]

I dont see a reason for Bork to come in swinging with a vote that, to me at least, is not RVS. I also dont aee a reason for him to be picked apart for it either. Healthy conversation boys, lets keep it healthy.

Now, having said the above, that commotion would be perfect muddy water for scum to hide in. Keep a keen eye.

[Indigo]

Or a keyen eye, either way

[Gamma Emerald]

I dont see a reason for Bork to come in swinging with a vote that, to me at least, is not RVS. I also dont aee a reason for him to be picked apart for it either. Healthy conversation boys, lets keep it healthy.

Now, having said the above, that commotion would be perfect muddy water for scum to hide in. Keep a keen eye.

So, you think Bork is not scum?
You're not really sorting alignments, just saying things.

[Pepchoninga]

I dont see a reason for Bork to come in swinging with a vote that, to me at least, is not RVS. I also dont aee a reason for him to be picked apart for it either. Healthy conversation boys, lets keep it healthy.

Now, having said the above, that commotion would be perfect muddy water for scum to hide in. Keep a keen eye.

You are defending his action without trying ti understand him first.

And yes, scum could use this as a hiding place. Defending his early actions could be used to get to this hiding place.

[Börk Börk]

@Bork, are you to new to mafia?

Yes, I've played one game on this site and that's it.

Which doesn't make any of what I say any less valid.

[Pepchoninga]

@Bork, are you to new to mafia?

Yes, I've played one game on this site and that's it.

Which doesn't make any of what I say any less valid.

It doesn't make it any less valid but it also doesn't make it any more believable. It's rushed and you really have no solid thing to go off from in that vote.

[Celtic]

Bork's confidence reads town to me.

[Börk Börk]

Seeing four pages here already, I got my hopes up that there would be some proper discussion to pick apart and use to scumhunt. But alas, it's a whole lot of fluff and alt fishing.

VOTE: pepchoninga for contributing almost nothing useful despite having the highest postcount. Because that's not useful at all, and yet artificially inflating one's postcount can prove to be useful as a false argument against one's lynch at a later stage.

Ok, I will take this as a "Bye RVS vote"

Your post is absolutely bad for these reasons: In those 4 pages, we have started a conversation. This conversation is full of fluff. And it was untill we got somethings real to discuss about. Creature seemed to want to give a good thing for us to prodice content but he basically ended the topic himself. There is nothing for us to do except keep posting until we have something real to talk about. And your vote is exactly that. Using the not producing content as an argument for a lynch in the first 4 pages is bad.

Instead of posting fluff and relying on someone else to produce content, you could have tried to do so yourself. That's why I voted you, and it's completely backed up by evidence.

It is beneficial to mafia to produce posts which lack content and distract town from keeping the game moving, as in the end town will have less time to dedicate to scumhunting. Therefore my case on you is also directly related to scummy behaviour, and not just policy.

[Pepchoninga]

Bork's confidence reads town to me.

Your reads seem strange. You don't really seem to be interested in being part of the conversation but rather just say how a certain of acting look town. Let me ask you, what is your definition of a towns behavior?

Also do you have padt experience on the game?