Open 667: Day 3

[Creature]

Then what I'm trying to influence?

[JasonWazza]

Vote Count 1.7

[2] SnarkySnowman: Creature, Celtic,
[2] Keyenpeydee: Indigo, Pepchoninga,
[1] Vijarada: Gamma Emerald,
[1] Indigo: Vijarada,

Not voting: SnarkySnowman, Börk Börk, keyenpeydee,

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch

Deadline:(expired on 2017-01-20 16:41:09)

[Pepchoninga]

Then what I'm trying to influence?

People into taking actions. From then good scum can manipulate the situation into a day one misslynch.

I suspect you would be a good player, hence a good scum.

[Börk Börk]

I still want to lynch Keyen for being an irritating kid, but that's independent of any scumreads. Another fishy aspect of what he's doing is being wishy-washy with his vote on me. Makes a case that he evidently believes in and then shortly afterwards, when it's clear that nobody has followed his vote, he takes it away, instantly changes his opinion, and is keen to move along so that he can avoid all scrutiny for his voting.
Having thought about it, I don't really know whether I want to hop onto the Indigo wagon so soon. Considering how many posts he's made, I don't think it's even possible to have a solid case. While this doesn't invalidate Vijarada's point, I am a bit confused as to why he's pushing his case this much. However overall it's a town-like action, as it attracts people's attention and therefore scrutiny.

[Börk Börk]

Y'know what? I convinced myself. VOTE: keyen

[Creature]

I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.

[keyenpeydee]

I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.

^^^

[Pepchoninga]

I still want to lynch Keyen for being an irritating kid, but that's independent of any scumreads. Another fishy aspect of what he's doing is being wishy-washy with his vote on me. Makes a case that he evidently believes in and then shortly afterwards, when it's clear that nobody has followed his vote, he takes it away, instantly changes his opinion, and is keen to move along so that he can avoid all scrutiny for his voting.
Having thought about it, I don't really know whether I want to hop onto the Indigo wagon so soon. Considering how many posts he's made, I don't think it's even possible to have a solid case. While this doesn't invalidate Vijarada's point, I am a bit confused as to why he's pushing his case this much. However overall it's a town-like action, as it attracts people's attention and therefore scrutiny.

Hmmm, not to be rude, but I'm pretty sure that I saw your profile and then it said you are 15. You know I might be mistaken but still. 13 and 15 isn't really a big gap, so calling him an irritating kid might be going a bit too far.

Furthermore the game is still in it's early tracks. Wanna tell ya something? You don't have a strong case on keyen either. Not defending him, but giving you something to think about. Overall I belive fast serious voting like that isn't good for us to get a healthy discussion. If we all go with mad votes head first, it is just gonna be easier for scum to take over the situation. Our biggest tool is words, not votes.

Vijarada seems Town enough for now, but his actions are fishy. Would like to see hisnoater reactions to solidify an opinion.

[Pepchoninga]

I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.

Should we lynch you then?

[Creature]

I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.

Should we lynch you then?

Well, you can, but I wouldn't like to be lynched. Also, I am neither of them.

[Pepchoninga]

I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.

Should we lynch you then?

Well, you can, but I wouldn't like to be lynched. Also, I am neither of them.

Fair enough.

I like you signature btw.

[Celtic]

I'm not a fan of how Creature and Keyen are attacking Bork's case. Rather than defending Keyen using logic, they are picking at his word choice.

[Celtic]

This is a good place to start.

VOTE: Keyen

[keyenpeydee]

Oh lol.

[Börk Börk]

I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.

10/10 for selectively reading the parts of my post which you can use against me. Maybe you didn't notice, but I made yet another point against him right after I acknowledged that he was an irritating kid.

[keyenpeydee]

Bork's case against me rendered me speechless because of her level of confbias and newbieness.

[JasonWazza]

Just going to put this here because it seems this conversation is going down this route, this is not saying i believe it's happening yet just a reminder.

Keep the Personal insults to a minimum

[Pepchoninga]

I'm not a fan of how Creature and Keyen are attacking Bork's case. Rather than defending Keyen using logic, they are picking at his word choice.

So you are a fan of how I handled her case on me then?

[Pepchoninga]

This is a good place to start.

VOTE: Keyen

Yet another pointless vote.

[keyenpeydee]

I still want to lynch Keyen for being an irritating kid, but that's independent of any scumreads. Another fishy aspect of what he's doing is being wishy-washy with his vote on me. Makes a case that he evidently believes in and then shortly afterwards, when it's clear that nobody has followed his vote, he takes it away, instantly changes his opinion, and is keen to move along so that he can avoid all scrutiny for his voting.

So you're saying that I unvoted because no one supported my case against you? Ridiculous. The reason I unvoted is with you having completed one newbie game and your 'stupid' reasons of suspecting me about that shit posts I made that has no connection game-related makes you look more like a newbie trying to scum hunt, than a dumb scum person trying to scum hunt.

UNVOTE:
Well, Bork is just... urgh. Anyways, her attempt to scumhunt and to end the rvs wagon sounds town although her words are unbelievable.

I also unvoted you because of how you are trying to scumhunt (By suspecting me for that alt talk whatever which is unbelievable) and your attempt to end the rvs wagon. That makes you town.

Idk what to feel about your case against me since all of it are very false and is a contradiction with what I am trying to point out. All I can say is you have no solid evidences and your way of forming a case against me is opposed to what I am trying to point out. If you still suspect me for dumb reasons, Don't ever play again with me.

[Pepchoninga]

Bork's case against me rendered me speechless because of her level of confbias and newbieness.

Don't call somebody a noob! If you want to make fun of the post there are other ways. As the mod said, keep the insult to a minimum.

[Pepchoninga]

UNVOTE:

Didn't realize that Key was at L-1.

[keyenpeydee]

Hey Pep, I'm not calling someone noob. I said newbie.

[keyenpeydee]

This is a good place to start.

VOTE: Keyen

[Pepchoninga]

Hey Pep, I'm not calling someone noob. I said newbie.

Same thing. Point there mistakes, but don't use newbie as a reason for it. It's disrespectful imo and is really a poor explanation. It's just my opinion off course but I needed to point it out.