Open 665 - Friends and Enemies - Game Over! Town Victory!!!

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:28 am

boring and rb are in this game? Sweet!

Alisae · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:29 am

What Uzi said except it's not terrible, it actually got a good reaction coming from Uzi.
The way I see it there really isn't any reason to ruin a reaction test like that.

-Grey- · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:30 am

In post 26, Alisae wrote:What Uzi said except it's not terrible, it actually got a good reaction coming from Uzi.
The way I see it there really isn't any reason to ruin a reaction test like that.

How does that make his reaction good instead of null, then?

Alisae · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:31 am

Good as in scummy Grey.

-Grey- · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:32 am

In post 28, Alisae wrote:Good as in scummy Grey.

I still don't get why his reaction isn't null if there's no reason to do what he did.

Alisae · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:33 am

The way I see it Town!Uzi had no reason to ruin the reaction test.

-Grey- · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:34 am

No reason = no purpose = no trajectory = no strategy = null.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:35 am

It was too obvious and it wasn't what RVS needed at the time. More CMM jokes would've been better.

havingfitz · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:36 am

LUV is scummy because he thought your reaction test was bad?

What reaction from others did he ruin by commenting on it?

Did you expect a vote or something?
What if a mason had got jumpy and chimed in that you were fos? How would that have helped town?

Alisae · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:37 am

Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:38 am

That's player specific.

-Grey- · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:40 am

In post 34, Alisae wrote:Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.

That's not at all what you stated out saying.

Moving the goalposts?

-Grey- · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:40 am

Started*

Alisae · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:42 am

In post 33, havingfitz wrote:LUV is scummy because he thought your reaction test was bad?

What reaction from others did he ruin by commenting on it?

Did you expect a vote or something?
What if a mason had got jumpy and chimed in that you were fos? How would that have helped town?

1. Who cares if it was bad or not he stated it was a reaction test instead of letting it play out.
2. 34. not really a vote.
3. That would be retarded and they know that. In which case they didn't help town at all.

havingfitz · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:46 am

In post 34, Alisae wrote:Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.

Your post was on the same page as the player list? I had to look at it to confirm my doubt Transcend was in the game. Why wouldn't scum just glance at the list as well.

And what if you had putted a mason accidentally?

P.edit

So an outted stupid mason would be ok?

havingfitz · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:47 am

Ebwop...stupid auto correct.

putted=outted

Hawk · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:01 am

Hi everybody!! Sup Uzi, Alishe, Grey. Speaking of grey.

I'M NEVER TRUSTING YOU AGAIN AFTER THAT LAST GAME!!!

VOTE: grey

-Grey- · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:04 am

In post 41, Hawk wrote:Hi everybody!! Sup Uzi, Alishe, Grey. Speaking of grey.

I'M NEVER TRUSTING YOU AGAIN AFTER THAT LAST GAME!!!

VOTE: grey

Rofl

ConManMick · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:06 am

In post 34, Alisae wrote:Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.

What are you making this assumption based on? Why wouldn't town read the player list?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:07 am

Hey Hawk!

scum!Grey is a slick one indeed!

ConManMick · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:07 am

Also TIL Hungarians don't appreciate hungry/Hungary based puns

-Grey- · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:09 am

In post 44, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Hey Hawk!

scum!Grey is a slick one indeed!

Why do you say that?

I understand Hawk, but you weren't in that game, so...?

mozamis · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:15 am

hey peeps

catching up...

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:15 am

In post 46, -Grey- wrote:
In post 44, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Hey Hawk!

scum!Grey is a slick one indeed!
Why do you say that?

I understand Hawk, but you weren't in that game, so...?

I read it and felt you played well.

-Grey- · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:17 am

In post 48, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 46, -Grey- wrote:
In post 44, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Hey Hawk!

scum!Grey is a slick one indeed!
Why do you say that?

I understand Hawk, but you weren't in that game, so...?
I read it and felt you played well.

When did you read it?