In post 548, -Grey- wrote:Hypocrite, thy name is matt.
Yeah I did admit earlier that I sheeped Giga a little too much, but when I did sheep him it was because I agreed with what he was saying, not because I wanted him to townread me.
In post 400, cassielle wrote:wrapping it up relatively quicklike. i got strong scumdar pings on gbT, schadd_ and rask.
In post 431, Creature wrote:This looks really reckless for scum, but what bothers me is that he took 13 mins to make post 240.
What's your opinion?
In post 455, cassielle wrote:actually, excluding gbT id like a condensed prelim reads list from you creature, just for compare and contrast purposes. ill do the same:
and if you could your preferred scumteam pairings.
In post 540, cassielle wrote:shade feels more scummy than gayreen or even tb imo. can i get the reasoning for him being above them? i guess another way to word this is -- what do you weight more when looking for scumreads? activity, content, tone, or gut? theres good reasons to reconsider shades placement based on some of those.
In post 555, mattblackguy wrote:I don't put too much weight into activity because it can be easily fabricated (See Rask). I guess I would say my scumreads come mostly from the type of content I see people post, and tone. If I feel someone is putting their reads out there, and is genuine with what they say (meaning they 100% believe what they are saying) then I'm more likely to town read them. It's the main reason I have a townread on schadd.
And again I try not to post if my post isn't going to advance the game at all. I don't like fluff too much, and try to avoid it when possible, which is why my post count is so much lower than many others.
In post 557, cassielle wrote:imo tb and gayreen pinging your scumdar for inactivity isnt very consistent here, even considering timing, shades also dropped off after an initial okay-ish showing
In post 557, cassielle wrote:main thing with shade is, his posts arent just sparse, theyre also real fake and forced (creature noticed too) and low on content. a lot of pushback at being questioned but its gt a joking tone without the outrage i expect from town.
In post 180, schadd_ wrote:interrogating is towny, emotions are scummy. a bit more of the former, tho
In post 489, schadd_ wrote:detail is what i used, as scum, to look like i was doing something. if you say something simple and then link to a post, then the attention is taken off of yourself. to add to this, i don't really have any grandiose reasoning for anyone, but i have given some amount of support for all of my moderately strong reads; you can probably find them if you really want to. i couldn't go through everyone without repeating myself. if you scumread me for that, cool.
incidentally, "theyre not feeling nice to me, im not liking them one bit." doesn't feel nice to me.
In post 472, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: Shade
Probably should've joined this wagon when it originally happened.
In post 286, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: rakkar
this is most likely the scum.
Holding onto the tell for now but it's a good one, tried and true.
In post 468, Raskolnikov wrote:Gayreen
Thinkbig/shade prob not
Not quite convincing, potentially wrong on someone
In post 569, Raskolnikov wrote:Cass replaced rakkar.