Mini Normal 1870 - Game Over

CloudKicker · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:05 am

In post 221, eagerSnake wrote:Well you're starting to become toxic at this point. Calling me incompetent and calling my reads bad... what are you even talking about? I hadn't even called you scum! I just said if you don't eventually start taking the game serious you're not a bad lynch. Which is true. People like that should be lynched repeatedly until they learn.

whyd you vote town then

CloudKicker · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:06 am

In post 221, eagerSnake wrote:Well you're starting to become toxic at this point. Calling me incompetent and calling my reads bad... what are you even talking about? I hadn't even called you scum! I just said if you don't eventually start taking the game serious you're not a bad lynch. Which is true. People like that should be lynched repeatedly until they learn.

i wont change my attitude, yall just will learn to read me

eagerSnake · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:06 am

The town motive is to get rid of toxic player

BYE bye CloudKicker

CloudKicker · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:07 am

In post 223, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 208, CloudKicker wrote:
In post 170, eagerSnake wrote:Because you've been non-caring/serious the entire game, and furthermore have promoted this attitude to others.
Not alignement indicative
Of course it is. People are trying to get the game going and ur purposefully trying to prevent it.

Anything that hurts or helps town is AI. You're hurting town.

lol, partypooper

CloudKicker · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:08 am

''hurting town'' im pretty sure only gerry and i and mayby garm arent advocating for a ml rn

eagerSnake · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:08 am

In post 229, CloudKicker wrote:''hurting town'' im pretty sure only gerry and i and mayby garm arent advocating for a ml rn

You just weakly called me scum here. Bye.

CloudKicker · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:09 am

In post 227, eagerSnake wrote:The town motive is to get rid of toxic player

BYE bye CloudKicker

you dont lynch toxic players, you lynchmafia. My win condition is when theres only town aligned players remaining, it doesnt say anything about toxic player, you look like a janitor third party with special win con

CloudKicker · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:09 am

In post 230, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 229, CloudKicker wrote:''hurting town'' im pretty sure only gerry and i and mayby garm arent advocating for a ml rn
You just weakly called me scum here. Bye.

i did, i think you called me scum about 20 times and still voting me, also you said you would give me BOTD and you voted me, you said you thought i was town, then you voted me

CloudKicker · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:10 am

Even if you gave me the BOTD like you said you did and will say you did, the time lapse between the ''BOTD'' and me waiting to play seriously is just complete bullshit, theres no way you believe you ''gave me'' enough time to adjust my play as to be a serious poster and what not

eagerSnake · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:13 am

I stopped giving you BOTD when you started insulting me.

CloudKicker · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:14 am

Well youre pushing a ml, so your reads are objectively not town good reads, what is your problem me calling them bad reads, if ure town those are bad reads

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:15 am

In post 231, CloudKicker wrote:you dont lynch toxic players, you lynchmafia.

True. But scum has a reason to be toxic. Town doesn't.

So when the it's early day 1 and the reasons to vote people are slim, who else should be voted for?

CloudKicker · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:15 am

So snake, do you think i am mafia aligned yes or no

CloudKicker · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:15 am

In post 236, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 231, CloudKicker wrote:you dont lynch toxic players, you lynchmafia.
True. But scum has a reason to be toxic. Town doesn't.

So when the it's early day 1 and the reasons to vote people are slim, who else should be voted for?

maybe you dont understand the motives behind, did you ask me ? uh oh, i dont think you did

CloudKicker · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:16 am

Half town has been lowkey throwing shade at me for nothing game related

CloudKicker · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:16 am

If you guys are okay with a lynch that is completly NAI, then good for you

CloudKicker · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:17 am

Btw if gerry vote me hes confirmed mafia

CloudKicker · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:18 am

And i am serious about this

CloudKicker · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:18 am

Even if gerry might think i could be mafia, he would respect my play better than voting me and pushing me at L-1 for random noobs to hammer me

eagerSnake · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:21 am

In post 235, CloudKicker wrote:Well youre pushing a ml, so your reads are objectively not town good reads, what is your problem me calling them bad reads, if ure town those are bad reads

I WASN'T EVEN PUSHING YOUR LYNCH WHEN YOU CALLED ME INCOMPETENT.

Lol. I even said you got a town role PM, but then you say my reads are bad. So what does that mean? That you're actually scum?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:21 am

In post 238, CloudKicker wrote:
In post 236, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 231, CloudKicker wrote:you dont lynch toxic players, you lynchmafia.
True. But scum has a reason to be toxic. Town doesn't.

So when the it's early day 1 and the reasons to vote people are slim, who else should be voted for?
maybe you dont understand the motives behind, did you ask me ? uh oh, i dont think you did

Eager sorta did:

In post 213, eagerSnake wrote:Why are you being so damn difficult

But sure, I'll be more explicit.

Cloud, what is your motivation for acting toxic?

CloudKicker · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:22 am

In post 244, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 235, CloudKicker wrote:Well youre pushing a ml, so your reads are objectively not town good reads, what is your problem me calling them bad reads, if ure town those are bad reads
I WASN'T EVEN PUSHING YOUR LYNCH WHEN YOU CALLED ME INCOMPETENT.

Lol. I even said you got a town role PM, but then you say my reads are bad. So what does that mean? That you're actually scum?

Twisting my words, what your purpose ?

CloudKicker · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:23 am

In post 245, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 238, CloudKicker wrote:
In post 236, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 231, CloudKicker wrote:you dont lynch toxic players, you lynchmafia.
True. But scum has a reason to be toxic. Town doesn't.

So when the it's early day 1 and the reasons to vote people are slim, who else should be voted for?
maybe you dont understand the motives behind, did you ask me ? uh oh, i dont think you did
Eager sorta did:
In post 213, eagerSnake wrote:Why are you being so damn difficult
But sure, I'll be more explicit.

Cloud, what is your motivation for acting toxic?

Not saying, but thanks for asking

CloudKicker · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:24 am

"Because you've been non-caring/serious the entire game, and furthermore have promoted this attitude to others."

im not responsible for anyones else play, non-caring/serious isnt ai <- bad reads

CloudKicker · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:24 am

In post 244, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 235, CloudKicker wrote:Well youre pushing a ml, so your reads are objectively not town good reads, what is your problem me calling them bad reads, if ure town those are bad reads
I WASN'T EVEN PUSHING YOUR LYNCH WHEN YOU CALLED ME INCOMPETENT.

Lol. I even said you got a town role PM, but then you say my reads are bad. So what does that mean? That you're actually scum?

So youre saying youre voting town, noted