Mini Normal 1870 - Game Over

[CloudKicker]

Hes refusing to explains his reads, im assuming theres a reason. I also think that gerry is a better player than to just vote someone for something that is face value which is in that context, switching votes 2-3 times and not explaining his read. I dont think elephant!scum would just vote randomly and be closed to others as his scum strategy and in the event he actually is scum, nothing that he has done is worthy of a vote imho

[JarJarDrinks]

Hes refusing to explains his reads, im assuming theres a reason.

Well if he's town then his reasoning is stupid and maybe enough votes on him will get him to speak up.

[eagerSnake]

"He's refusing to explain his reads"

You're using that as a basis to not vote him? That's my reason for voting him.

"I also think that gerry is a better player than to just vote someone for something that is face value"

So one of you is scum? Or he's just playing poorly?

[eagerSnake]

elephant is obviously not a good vote atm

I still don't see this

[CloudKicker]

Hes refusing to explains his reads, im assuming theres a reason.

Well if he's town then his reasoning is stupid and maybe enough votes on him will get him to speak up.

i dont believe in voting someone to make them talk this early in the game, i vote for mafia only

[CloudKicker]

elephant is obviously not a good vote atm

I still don't see this

i dont expect you to

[CloudKicker]

"He's refusing to explain his reads"

You're using that as a basis to not vote him? That's my reason for voting him.

"I also think that gerry is a better player than to just vote someone for something that is face value"

So one of you is scum? Or he's just playing poorly?

hence why i asked him if he was mefia, gerry is a bettar playar

[eagerSnake]

"He's refusing to explain his reads"

You're using that as a basis to not vote him? That's my reason for voting him.

"I also think that gerry is a better player than to just vote someone for something that is face value"

So one of you is scum? Or he's just playing poorly?

Your argument is "nadpool is obviously not a good vote atm because he's randomly voting 2-3 times and not explaining why"

[eagerSnake]

Idk why it quoted my own post

[JarJarDrinks]

i dont believe in voting someone to make them talk this early in the game, i vote for mafia only

Mental note: If I'm ever scum in a game w/ Cloud, just don't make any posts.


Not sure if you realize that the only way to catch scum on day 1 is if they post words to be read OR if a lurker is lynched.

So not sure why'd you'd try to encourage someone to lurk.

[eagerSnake]

i dont believe in voting someone to make them talk this early in the game, i vote for mafia only

Dont make me laugh. You've already voted 3 people. There's only 2 mafia in this game.

One of the people was me and I know I'm town so LOL.

[CloudKicker]

"He's refusing to explain his reads"

You're using that as a basis to not vote him? That's my reason for voting him.

"I also think that gerry is a better player than to just vote someone for something that is face value"

So one of you is scum? Or he's just playing poorly?

Your argument is "nadpool is obviously not a good vote atm because he's randomly voting 2-3 times and not explaining why"

Hey bro, im tired of your incomprehension skills, literraly every damn time you quote something i say, you twist everything like you cant read english. I said i dont think hes a good vote because his play doesnt look like a scum play, to me. And that theres very little gain so far to vote a guy like that who didnt give enough content

[CloudKicker]

i dont believe in voting someone to make them talk this early in the game, i vote for mafia only

Mental note: If I'm ever scum in a game w/ Cloud, just don't make any posts.


Not sure if you realize that the only way to catch scum on day 1 is if they post words to be read OR if a lurker is lynched.

So not sure why'd you'd try to encourage someone to lurk.

not sure if you realize i can play ty and im fine with my reads so far

[CloudKicker]

im not encouranging it, im just not discouraging it by voting him

[eagerSnake]

JarJar, search user posts on nadpool. He's forcing a post restriction on himself. He's a troll alt account.

He should be removed. Can we do WotC after the game starts?

[CloudKicker]

i dont believe in voting someone to make them talk this early in the game, i vote for mafia only

Dont make me laugh. You've already voted 3 people. There's only 2 mafia in this game.

One of the people was me and I know I'm town so LOL.

implying my vote on you was anything but a joke

[eagerSnake]

Now that you know he is post restricting himself regardless of alignment, how do you feel CloudKicker

[CloudKicker]

Hm if its a gimmcik then its nai by definition

[CloudKicker]

Another reason not to vote the guy for it but encouraging him to participate, or at least explain his reads with posts restriction

[CloudKicker]

Voting someone for a nai gimmick falls into policy lynch territory

[eagerSnake]

I like alt accounts. I don't really care if they are secret or not.

What should I do with this one? Think of it like a post-restriction but for an account's entire play-style.

[eagerSnake]

I'm policy lynching. See yall day 2.

[CloudKicker]

I read it

[CloudKicker]

You could also opt to wait if you have actual scumread and then policy lynch if theres no better reads at the end of d1 ? Even if hes gimmick he could still be town and have correct reads. Also the longer the day, the longer mafia might want to jump on him and the longer we get reads, cutting D1 with a policy lynch on a restricting poster page 14 is extremely anti town my lil snake

[eagerSnake]

It's not like I have the power to lynch him myself.