Mods?? MODS??? (ego)
nahIn post 340, zakk wrote:Nominate Nahdia for "Blunt"
She's very blunt. Idk if she smokes weed but tbh it's not about thatSpoiler: reasons, I guessShe don't mince words bruh
isn't it sort of the point though? Just "Top Tier" sounds super bland. like, i wouldn't know what that refers to even knowing Ranger. could just be saying she's good. which i mean, it's true, but it's not a reference to her readlists.In post 679, Alchemist21 wrote:2nd Top Tier
I think adding the format of her readslist is kinda forcing it.
PM a discussion mod i think.In post 792, Killthestory wrote:how does this speakeasy application shit work its been like a couple days and im still here like tf what please someone help
This user explained JokeExplainBot's joke, which is what JokeExplainBot usually does.
thank u but i dont think this is a good title for me.In post 1104, zakk wrote:nominate Nahdia for *skreeeeeee* due to the Eagles team meme during the Speakeasy User Popularity Poll
i was jokes in all seriousness i do subscribe to your "title ideology" or w/e u wanna call it.In post 1329, SleepyKrew wrote:Titles have value because the community on the site at some point in time decided they had value. They decided that you had to be nominated for something and it had to get approved and whatnot. If the community wanted titles to be worthless, people would still be able to set their rank to whatever they wanted. But over time, the title process became more strict and serious, not less. This is the first time during my stay on the site that I feel like people want titles to become meaningless. Maybe it's a few vocal shitters or maybe it really has become the majority opinion, idk. But it makes me sad
chev tossed it right into the "not worthy of a response" category.In post 2147, Natirasha wrote:In post 2117, Chevre wrote:Approve Nekonfidante and Cat Whisperer. I vastly prefer Nekonfidante, but Cat Whisperer is good too. And I did contemplate the fact that LLD asked for a title, which isn't a thing condoned around here, but given that she was already worthy of a title and the reasoning behind that title is no longer wholly salient, I'm OK with this. 48 hours!
Reject President Bear. The "Bear" sentiment fits without a doubt, but I do not get the "President" part. It seems to have sprung up wholly from Papa Zito, or at least, from nothing I can see on the site. I think we can do better.
Excuse me; I think you missed a title that got the requisite number of nominations.
Adore it on multiple levels. Thanks very much, friends~In post 2556, Chevre wrote:Approve Scheherazade. It’s been said in the thread by now but Scheherazade is the storyteller from One Thousand and One Nights, and given her Speakeasy thread and just her general tale-telling nature, it’s a really great fit. A tiny part of me pines for a pun, but someone in the thread said that puns aren’t necessary in every title, and I think this is one of those times, because Scheherazade is so perfect. 48 hours!
holy fuck you're cory.In post 2941, Killthestory wrote:In post 2903, Killthestory wrote:i mean i wuld if i wasnt permabanned 4 times from my homesite lmao
but im not sure u have the evidence 2 support that nobody talks about their homesite like that. i know a couple forumers who went to talk about their homesite all the time but i dont find it vry memorable
make that 5 times