In post 186, zakk wrote:Nominate psyche for noun [sīk] 1.disdain for his general scornful attitude towards everyone and everything. Not an insult, not a joke. Psyche I think this might fit you.
In post 267, Bins wrote:it should be required to at least provide some explanation for title noms or else it just looks like inside jokes and it's hard to support as someone out of the loop
In post 324, Aristophanes wrote:*Sigh*Chevre wrote:As a fledgling fairy, SleepyKrew's advice is welcomed. I'll value it.
And he's right here. I'm not going to award a title that says "you are everything which this site stands against." Titles are honors, not demerits.
That's not at all what it means, nor how it is intended.
Is that not obvious? I thought it was obvious.
In post 509, Thestatusquo wrote:To me, to have people in this site, and especially people who i am not even particularly close to recognize and appreciate what I've been trying to do on this site with regards to personalizing and shrinking the chasm of the internet is deeply touching to me and actually almost brought me to tears at work tonight. I appreciate it from the bottom of my heart and it made me feel like my time here has meant something to people. So you can understand how I might have a different perspective to you.
In post 662, InflatablePie wrote:GreyICE -> Fifty Shades
In post 912, Papa Zito wrote:Savage.
In post 15130, BROseidon wrote:savage
In post 29, BROseidon wrote:Savage
In post 18, BROseidon wrote:Savage
In post 1002, mykonian wrote:ok, it bothers me that whenever I see SiW appear somewhere, in my head it translates to "hippo's girlfriend". Could I nom hiplop for SiW's boyfriend?
In post 1693, pirate mollie wrote:uhm. wat
eta: when did this change? it was my understanding that a member always had the right to say yaye or naye to a title that they will have to wear.
In post 2420, Psyche wrote:I oppose it because it rewards something about him that is detestable.