You seem really definite about this. How confident are you? I can see him being a bit suspect maybe. But you seemed to have gone onto overdrive on him.
I'm 95% sure.
In post 420, boring wrote:It's just the way I speak when I'm being a touch condescending, I suppose. Like "are we feeling well?" and "we're going to need you to sit down, now, sweetie." I think it's pretty normal for old ladies like me.
Is the basis for your vote her not voting?
If so, why did you choose her and not LUV?
If not, what are the other reasons?
Do you usually prefer to join existing wagons or create them?
In [url=/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8716281#p8716281]post 156[/url], Empking wrote:
In post 142, tojam2 wrote:NV (5) - BlueBloodedToffee, Alisae, Antihuman, SnarkySnowman, Lil Uzi Vert
FOS: Everyone n this list
Why?
I unvoted so that I could reread and re-evaluate the game.
That's no excuse. Throwing away pressure is only pro-scum.
Why Al over LUV? Gut or arbitrariness, it could have gone either way but I leant a little to Al. I didn't even notice the wagon, as hard as that is to believe, as the huge numbers of not voters stood out to me and I immediately reacted.
I usually prefer joining wagons - all else be equal - but my priority with two weeks to go is my biggest scum read.
- Right here, you tried. No one asked you why you were voting for him, you were asked why you FoS'd everyone who wasn't voting.
- Now you're voting Ali for mason hunting? Bullshit, he wasn't accused of that earlier.
This is another lie. I have never said that my vote was put on Ali for mason-hunting. You've just quoted my explanation for her obver LUV. owever, with your constant lying, then you're still getting beaten by Ali for Mason-hunting.
- That's not even the original question you asked. You asked what was wrong with your jump on Ali and I said it was suspicious. I didn't state anything wrong with your jump beforehand so I never even repeated myself. Regardless, it's me explaining why I voted you for your jump on Ali. Your dislike of it doesn't mean it isn't valid.
This is arguing semantics. "You didn't say scummy, you said wrong-with"!
If you were Mason-hunting, I'd have moved my vote to you, by now.
This implies that you're now voting Ali because you think he's mason hunting and that if you thought I were, you would've moved your vote to me.
I don't even understand what you're saying in your last point. My point still stands though. I gave you an explanation, just because you don't find it satisfactory doesn't mean it isn't one or not valid.
In post 426, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:This implies that you're now voting Ali because you think he's mason hunting and that if you thought I were, you would've moved your vote to me.
My vote is still on ali partly because of Mason-hunting.
However, your post was clearly implying that I was claiming that my vote was put on her for mason-hunting. Which iwould've have been true. But was not what I was claiming.
"What's wrong with my post" "It was suspicious" is not an explanation. Its a theasaurus. I assume your denials of this basic facts are trying to bait me. But I'm not sure why you'd go with something so banal.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
In post 426, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:This implies that you're now voting Ali because you think he's mason hunting and that if you thought I were, you would've moved your vote to me.
My vote is still on ali partly because of Mason-hunting.
However, your post was clearly implying that I was claiming that my vote was put on her for mason-hunting. Which iwould've have been true. But was not what I was claiming.
"What's wrong with my post" "It was suspicious" is not an explanation. Its a theasaurus. I assume your denials of this basic facts are trying to bait me. But I'm not sure why you'd go with something so banal.
No one is trying to bait you. I gave a reason and/or justification for what I found wrong about your vote. Instead of saying you don't like it or asking me to phrase it better, you continue to argue the meaning of the word.
In post 420, boring wrote:It's just the way I speak when I'm being a touch condescending, I suppose. Like "are we feeling well?" and "we're going to need you to sit down, now, sweetie." I think it's pretty normal for old ladies like me.
Maybe
, except... why would you look to me to help defend someone you've been questioning?
Why do you assume that I would defend someone simply because I townread them? What gives you the basis for that belief?
This is getting tedious. I've reviewed this one for you twice already.
In post 376, boring wrote:I'm not sure what's not to understand. I want to lock you into your statement.
In post 417, boring wrote:Committing you to either discuss or stick to your read on Alisae is far more important in the long run than harassing you in the moment. Especially when I'm still working to solidify reads.
I don't care about Alisae in particular. I don't care about your reads in particular. I don't care how exactly you handle your townreads being under pressure. I cared that you flipped script and wouldn't explain it. I cared that you were willing to defend it. I figured that if you decided to flip script again, you're going to owe us an explanation for this last flip as a part of your back-tracking process. I wanted to lay the foundation for that and then move on with the game until/if the time comes that I'd need to revisit.
I'm going to do some reviewing. It'll take a little while. I'd like more people telling me about BBT, if you guys don't mind.
Snarky and Fitz, can you talk to me about Hawk?
FancyPants, your expanded explanation of my suspicions isn't going to come unless I'm ready to make a real push on you. I haven't decided if/when that's going to happen. There are a lot of shady characters in this game. In the meantime, some scumhunting would be awesome.
LUV, do you have three people you absolutely won't lynch today?
It's safe and easy. Like anyone who was scum could have gave that exact answer. Like no effort was actually put into the reasoning why. It comes off to me as fake.
Unless you're masons with them lmao.
Also boring the "Copy someone's reads down" isn't bullshit. Scum could just copy down someone's reads to look like they are contributing. It's no effort. Not to mention it allows scum to sway the person who wants to quickly copy down the reads to think that x people are town when really they aren't. Plus it was like, 7 pages in. Anyone should have been able to read 7 pages in 7 minutes and develop reads.
In post 441, Alisae wrote:Also boring the "Copy someone's reads down" isn't bullshit. Scum could just copy down someone's reads to look like they are contributing. It's no effort. Not to mention it allows scum to sway the person who wants to quickly copy down the reads to think that x people are town when really they aren't. Plus it was like, 7 pages in. Anyone should have been able to read 7 pages in 7 minutes and develop reads.
You'd be surprised how hard it is to effectively read and analyze 5+ pages in less than 10 minutes.
In post 441, Alisae wrote:Also boring the "Copy someone's reads down" isn't bullshit. Scum could just copy down someone's reads to look like they are contributing. It's no effort. Not to mention it allows scum to sway the person who wants to quickly copy down the reads to think that x people are town when really they aren't. Plus it was like, 7 pages in. Anyone should have been able to read 7 pages in 7 minutes and develop reads.
You'd be surprised how hard it is to effectively read and analyze 5+ pages in less than 10 minutes.
You'd be surprised how hard it is to effectively read and analyze page 1 in less than 1 minute.
In post 442, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:What is the scum motivation for giving such an obviously safe and easy answer then?
Dodging the need to justify your choices based on the player's content.
“Trust is an orchid, beautiful but delicate, requiring ideal conditions in order to thrive. Without them, it dies.” - Dahrk (Arrow, Season 4)
---
"-grey- would hardclaim an inno on his obv-scum partner D2 in a micro if he could" - gigabyteTroubadour
"You type like a Bond villain." - DogWatch
