Star Wars Rogue One [GAME OVER]

[PeregrineV]

Also I'm full JK and locked Cakez two nights in a row. This was said in the claim.

VOTE AJ

I probably dont need to read anymore,
seeing I didnt get a "no result" on cakez, you whore.

I will continue reading, to see what this is to see.
but unless i was redirected, the next scum has been caught, who wants to thank me?

You were suspicious enough of Sir Cake to do your thing to him, and your wondering why AJ was suspicious enough to jailkeep him? His iso is full of arguing his Cake scumread.

This is some strange ass logic- do you think AJ is bussing Cake?

[PeregrineV]

it is my understanding the a JK, makes the "target" untargetable.
"no result" was not my result label.

That's rolestopper.

[PeregrineV]

VOTE: AJ

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Jailkeeper

If cakez was on jail, he could not do an action.

DP would have gotten that result, not Cakez did whatever.

So excuse me for being annoyed at your lecture spam.

If you know Drunken Piper's claim is consistent with AJ's claim, why does that deserve a vote on AJ?

[PeregrineV]

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Jailkeeper

(DP reads this following..."A Jailkeeper that

simultaneously blocks and protects their target

is considered Normal on mafiascum.net, provided that any mutual blocking scenarios are planned for during review. Any role that receives results (such as Tracker or Watcher)

but is blocked

should receive a "no result" message, rather than told their target didn't go anywhere or nobody visited their target. A Jailkeeper cannot stop a Strongman from committing a kill.")

You were not blocked, Cake was blocked.

I'm not sure if people are really this unsure of roles and how they work, or are intentionally misrepresenting them on purpose....

I'm feeling like it's the latter.

[Infinity 324]

...this is the guy that got a guilty on pine

[Infinity 324]

Where are you at with reads at this point pere?

[PeregrineV]

Vote: SirCakez

I'm more willing to do this than zefiend, but it has much the same problem.
Would SirCakez flipping scum actually get you listening to me?

Yes. Bussing you entire team will make me listen to you. If you happen to be town, then you are playing to your wincon in lynching scum.

Also, I don't feel the need to establish myself as town by lynching yet another scum. That won't stop idiots from scumreading me, and it won't give people who

aren't

scumreading me any more proof than what they already have. In short, it won't change how people view me at all, because they'll make excuses or because they already knew and didn't need proof.

What I DO need to do is to lynch the scum who aren't getting lynched without me pushing there. zefiend is scum, who can be lynched today or any day. SirCakez is scum, who I feel can be lynched any day but there may be resistance, which is why he's a slightly better lynch than zefiend. But BBMolla? Molla, if left alive, won't be caught. He will get away with it. And that's why I'm not moving my vote unless I have no choice but to move my vote. Today we will lynch scum. I guarantee you that much. It's just a matter of which scum we lynch.

So that is a no on lynching SirCake your scumread for 100+ Mastina posts?

I am really shocked.

[PeregrineV]

...this is the guy that got a guilty on pine

Yes.

Where are you at with reads at this point pere?

I think they are all out there.

Mastina & Cake are scumreads, TWIE a null (unread), most others leaning on the townside of null.

[Infinity 324]

I thought you said you thought piper was being intentionally obtuse wrt setup, so how do you townread him? What do you think of him unvoting aj if that's the case?

[Drunken Piper]

Also I'm full JK and locked Cakez two nights in a row. This was said in the claim.

VOTE AJ

I probably dont need to read anymore,
seeing I didnt get a "no result" on cakez, you whore.

I will continue reading, to see what this is to see.
but unless i was redirected, the next scum has been caught, who wants to thank me?

You were suspicious enough of Sir Cake to do your thing to him, and your wondering why AJ was suspicious enough to jailkeep him? His iso is full of arguing his Cake scumread.

This is some strange ass logic- do you think AJ is bussing Cake?

Night 1 I understand, but there was a kill.
why jail the same person (night 2) when his suspension was Kling? Hard swallowed pill.

also, he just happens to claim to jail keep in the eve
the same person I just happen to see not move AFTER I claim, hard to believe.

also WHY claim, there was no reason too.
it was bizarre and out of the blue.

[Drunken Piper]

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Jailkeeper

(DP reads this following..."A Jailkeeper that

simultaneously blocks and protects their target

is considered Normal on mafiascum.net, provided that any mutual blocking scenarios are planned for during review. Any role that receives results (such as Tracker or Watcher)

but is blocked

should receive a "no result" message, rather than told their target didn't go anywhere or nobody visited their target. A Jailkeeper cannot stop a Strongman from committing a kill.")

You were not blocked, Cake was blocked.

I'm not sure

if people

are really this unsure of roles and how they work, or are intentionally misrepresenting them on purpose....

I'm feeling like it's the latter.

so are you saying I scum?
that leaves me sad and numb.

[Nero Cain]

I was ISOing Infinity......

One of my favorite scum tactics, making it seem like the arguments against you are ridiculous.

If you think this often comes from scum why were you hard ton reading Titus while she was doing this to me?

[Aj The Epic]

Also I'm full JK and locked Cakez two nights in a row. This was said in the claim.

VOTE AJ

I probably dont need to read anymore,
seeing I didnt get a "no result" on cakez, you whore.

I will continue reading, to see what this is to see.
but unless i was redirected, the next scum has been caught, who wants to thank me?

You were suspicious enough of Sir Cake to do your thing to him, and your wondering why AJ was suspicious enough to jailkeep him? His iso is full of arguing his Cake scumread.

This is some strange ass logic- do you think AJ is bussing Cake?

Night 1 I understand, but there was a kill.
why jail the same person (night 2) when his suspension was Kling? Hard swallowed pill.

also, he just happens to claim to jail keep in the eve
the same person I just happen to see not move AFTER I claim, hard to believe.

also WHY claim, there was no reason too.
it was bizarre and out of the blue.

Kling was the counterwagon to Pine. To me, there was an indication that Kling might still be town. I also submitted my action rather late because I wasn't sure exactly what I wanted out of it. Thought about using it as protection but didn't want to block town roles.

Why claim? It's ALMOST like I explained that already WHEN I CLAIMED.

[Infinity 324]

I was ISOing Infinity......

One of my favorite scum tactics, making it seem like the arguments against you are ridiculous.

If you think this often comes from scum why were you hard ton reading Titus while she was doing this to me?

Where?

[Nero Cain]

the whole "Nero just is vendetta "scum" reading me. He has no reasons"

[Nero Cain]

infinity, can you do me a solid and find the post where you said wh you wanted in the crew.

[Nero Cain]

I knida feel like 2 town JOATs is a possible thing. So AJ might be the scum in that group but then like 2 JOATs/full JK doesn't seem impossible either. Even if there's one scum between those 3 there's still 2-3 more. Lets lynch Titus.

[Nero Cain]

but then AJ being shit with his actions does kinda bother me.....

[Firebringer]

Vote Count 3.08

Titus [2] Nero Cain, Drunken Piper
Aj the Epic [1] Titus
BBmolla [1] Mastina,
TheWayItEnds [1] BBmolla
SirCakez [2] PeregrineV, zefiend,
zefiend [4] Heartless, Aj the Epic, SirCakez, Infinity 324


Not Voting - [1] TheWayItEnds,

With 12 Alive, It Takes 7 To Lynch.

Rogue Leader Vote:

Infinity 324 (1) Aj The Epic
Drunken Piper (4) Infinity 324, Sircakez, PeregrineV, Titus
SirCakez (1) Nero Cain

Mod Notes - May the flavor be with you.
Titus is V/LA till Monday Feb 6th
Zefiend V/LA till Tuesday Feb 7th

Day 3 ends in (expired on 2017-02-13 05:26:20)!

[Infinity 324]

Probably not. I'd probably do me mastin desp or me desp and a scummish/null player.

The titus thing is not the same nero. What molla did was make a specific point seem like it's a ridiculous point even though it wasn't really.

[Nero Cain]

vote:Drunken Piper for RL

[Drunken Piper]

(DP- scribbles a little note down.)

MOD: If there was a JK in the game, and they jailed the RL, would the RL still be able to distribute the powers

?[/i]

~No

[Aj The Epic]

but then AJ being shit with his actions does kinda bother me.....

Bruh if I was scum why would I:

Claim JK against someone (either my partner or cleared town...)
Claim a block on someone who DL tracked? I mean, I guess this can be said "oh you know he didn't go anywhere" but w/e.
Double RB the same person in claim or in action, specifically not someone in rogue crew
Reveal at all...

Nero I'm going to say something you'd call heresy: Both you and Titus are town this game. Like Titus' actions recently are fine, and I don't think her and Pine play that way around infinity early D1. Or at least it would be more coordinated to getting Infinity to buy Pine as an ally.

[Nero Cain]

heresy! BURN THE HEATHEN!

[Nero Cain]

DP what was the nature of your guilty on Pine?