I will admit that I am still very picky about RVC phases and will continue to do so.
Not a fan of this. This is useless.In post 23, SnarkySnowman wrote:VOTE: Vonflare this usually goes well
I don't care how sarcastic this is. It's not helpful. It's more distracting than pushing the mod on Page 1.In post 39, Vedith wrote:Stranger has a 90% chance of having 20% chance of flipping scum.
Worth a quick lynch?
Good thinking. Not very suitable actions for the thoughts though.In post 41, Klingoncelt wrote:The game's barely started and he's heading into prod range.In post 37, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:pretty sure he hasnt posted yet unless I have gotten dumber than i was before
Makes him a decent candidate for a policy lynch.
This makes no sense to me. Why would you vote Klingoncelt?In post 43, Jaack wrote:UPPER looks like a game mechanic playerslot to me. The player isn't on the sign-up list and there is one more player thanone would expect in a mini. Also the account only has one post in the test post thread
Lynching it might not be the worst idea just to figure out what it is, but at the same time I'd rather lynch scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Klingoncelt
Bringing up a pl on a 'lurker' this early is lame. I mean, literally no one ever policy lynches in the wee pages of D1, but it's lame even for a policy lynch suggestion.
I find somethingIn post 45, Jaack wrote:Eh he suggests a policy lynch but doesn't vote for it either. There some inconsistent logic in there.
Does this have anything to do with your role or are you being serious?In post 46, Vedith wrote:Kling is fine with me, I just want the day to end really early.
Really not feeling this response. That's all you had to say to a somewhat serious vote? I thought you wanted to continue discussion?In post 62, Klingoncelt wrote:Anyway, at least I got a bit of discussion started, if this game goes any slower it'll start moving backwards.
Yet I have literally 5+ posts quoted already and this is all you're willing to share?In post 69, KuroiXHF wrote:I'm caught up. Don't worry about me, sweetheart.In post 68, drealmerz7 wrote:Instead of commentingon needing to catch up and how there isn't much to catch up on and excuses. How about just catch up and post something significant and until then don't clutter the thread, there are wayyyy too many posts happening as it is, it's hard to keep up.
Pupper is cute.
High-5 buddy. You've risen far from the bottom.In post 75, Jaack wrote:That being said, I'm not feeling anymore comfortable with these responses.
While you're right that getting discussion started is a good thing, I don't necessarily see that as the intention behind your post that I took issue with. And even if that was the intention, you've done little to continue on this discussion.
I love one-liners that show you are very eagerly staying on slidelines so much.In post 77, Vedith wrote:Jaack... You scum?
My vote is going on you if this continues.In post 95, Vedith wrote:Okay, so who's next for the questioning?
Page 5 is pretty garbage on all sides except that McMemmo is 99% town.
Follow me Pupper and you will sleep tight.
I would like more content from the following:
AlpacaAlpaca
Drone
Gamma Emerald (currently sitting at spot no. 2 for vote)
mhsmith0
Pupper
SnarkySnowman
StrangerCoug